Literature DB >> 19411217

An in vitro study of the correlation between bubble distribution, acoustic emission, and cell damage by contrast ultrasound.

Stanley Samuel1, J Brian Fowlkes, Douglas L Miller.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the influences of total exposure duration and pulse-to-pulse bubble distribution on contrast-mediated cell damage. Murine macrophage cells were grown as monolayers on thin polyester sheets. Contrast agent microbubbles were attached to these cells by incubation. Focused ultrasound exposures (P(r) = 2 MPa) were implemented at a frequency of 2.25 MHz with 46 cycle pulses and pulse repetition frequencies (PRF) of 1 kHz, 500 Hz, 100 Hz, and 10 Hz in a degassed water bath at 10 or 100 pulses. A 1 MHz receive transducer measured the scattered signal. The frequency spectrum was normalized to a control spectrum from linear scatterers. Photomicrographs were captured before, during, and after exposure at a frame rate of 2000 fps and a pixel resolution of 960 x 720. Results clearly show that cell death is increased, up to 60%, by increasing total exposure duration from 0 ms to 100 ms. There was an increasing difference in cell damage between a 10-pulse exposure and a 100-pulse exposure with increasing PRF. The greatest change in damage occurred at 1000 Hz PRF with a 53% increase between 10-pulse and 100-pulse exposures. For each pulse from 0 to 10, an overlay of the 2 mum bubble count with corresponding emission shows consistent behavior in its pulse-to-pulse changes, indicating a correlation between acoustic emission, bubble distribution, and cell damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19411217      PMCID: PMC2711435          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2009.1075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  21 in total

Review 1.  Mechanical bioeffects from diagnostic ultrasound: AIUM consensus statements. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors:  J B Fowlkes; C K Holland
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction.

Authors:  J E Chomas; P Dayton; J Allen; K Morgan; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  A Newtonian rheological model for the interface of microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Dhiman Chatterjee; Kausik Sarkar
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Thresholds for transient cavitation produced by pulsed ultrasound in a controlled nuclei environment.

Authors:  C K Holland; R E Apfel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Using light scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro.

Authors:  Jingfeng Guan; Thomas J Matula
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Ultrasound-induced gas release from contrast agent microbubbles.

Authors:  Michiel Postema; Ayache Bouakaz; Michel Versluis; Nico de Jong
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  The relationship of acoustic emission and pulse-repetition frequency in the detection of gas body stability and cell death.

Authors:  Stanley Samuel; Douglas L Miller; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Optical and acoustical observations of the effects of ultrasound on contrast agents.

Authors:  P A Dayton; K E Morgan; A L Klibanov; G H Brandenburger; K W Ferrara
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  The relationship of scattered subharmonic, 3.3-MHz fundamental and second harmonic signals to damage of monolayer cells by ultrasonically activated Albunex.

Authors:  D L Miller; S Bao
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Ultrasound contrast agents nucleate inertial cavitation in vitro.

Authors:  D L Miller; R M Thomas
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  4 in total

1.  In vivo transcranial cavitation threshold detection during ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in mice.

Authors:  Yao-Sheng Tung; Fotios Vlachos; James J Choi; Thomas Deffieux; Kirsten Selert; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  An ex vivo study of the correlation between acoustic emission and microvascular damage.

Authors:  Stanley Samuel; Michol A Cooper; Joseph L Bull; J Brian Fowlkes; Douglas L Miller
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Ultrasound molecular imaging of tumor angiogenesis with an integrin targeted microbubble contrast agent.

Authors:  Christopher R Anderson; Xiaowen Hu; Hua Zhang; Jose Tlaxca; Anne-Emilie Declèves; Robert Houghtaling; Kumar Sharma; Michael Lawrence; Katherine W Ferrara; Joshua J Rychak
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A CLINICAL BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER OPENING ULTRASOUND SYSTEM.

Authors:  Fabrice Marquet; Yao-Sheng Tung; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Nano Life       Date:  2010-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.