Literature DB >> 19410989

Comparative clinical outcomes of submuscular and subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Yann Philippe Charles1, Bertrand Coulet, Jean-Claude Rouzaud, Jean-Pierre Daures, Michel Chammas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine retrospectively whether the technique of ulnar nerve transposition (subcutaneous versus submuscular) is associated with clinical sensory and motor recovery in cubital tunnel syndrome, and whether recovery is influenced by prognostic factors such as preoperative McGowan stage, age, and duration of symptoms.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients (average age, 53 years; follow-up, 7 years) with cubital tunnel syndrome had submuscular transposition, and 24 patients (average age, 46 years; follow-up, 3 years) were treated by subcutaneous transposition. There were 11 McGowan stage II and 14 stage III patients in the submuscular group and 14 stage II and 10 stage III patients in the subcutaneous group. Preoperatively, all patients presented with diminished 2-point discrimination. Postoperative sensory and motor recovery was evaluated clinically.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between subjective results in the submuscular and subcutaneous groups: 20 of 25 patients in the submuscular group versus 17 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group were clearly improved, and 3 of 25 patients in the submuscular group versus 6 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group partially improved. The logistic multivariate regression analysis indicated that sensory and motor function were both significantly improved following both surgical techniques. Sensory function recovered (2-point discrimination <6 mm) in 17 of 25 patients in the submuscular group and in 17 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group, and motor function recovered (intrinsic strength grade 5) in 19 of 25 patients in the submuscular group and in 19 of 24 patients in the subcutaneous group. Symptoms lasting more than 6 months were associated with a poor prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Sensory and motor recovery for patients with McGowan stages II and III of cubital tunnel syndrome were similar following submuscular and subcutaneous transposition techniques, and patients with symptoms lasting longer than 6 months had a worse prognosis regardless of surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19410989     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  14 in total

1.  The effect of operative technique on ulnar nerve strain following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Justin Mitchell; John C Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Julia Bader; Derek F Ipsen; Christopher L Forthman; Aaron Dykstra
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-05-22

2.  Pain and Function Following Revision Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Kristen M Davidge; Gregory C Ebersole; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-11-28

3.  Predictors of functional outcomes after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the SUN study group.

Authors:  Patricia B Burns; H Myra Kim; R Glenn Gaston; Steven C Haase; Warren C Hammert; Jeffrey N Lawton; Greg A Merrell; Paul F Nassab; Lynda J Yang; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Comparison of In Situ Versus Subcutaneous Versus Submuscular Transpositions in the Management of McGowan Stage III Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Ali Izadpanah; Christopher Gibbs; Robert J Spinner; Sanjeev Kakar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-03-24

5.  Patient-reported outcome of surgical treatment of nerve entrapments in the proximal forearm.

Authors:  Birgitta Svernlöv; Göran Nylander; Lars Adolfsson
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-09-11

6.  Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve Affects Elbow Range of Motion: A Mean 13.5 Years of Follow-up.

Authors:  Xing-Hua Liu; Mao-Qi Gong; Yang Wang; Chang Liu; Shao-Liang Li; Xie-Yuan Jiang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Revision Peripheral Nerve Surgery of the Upper Extremity.

Authors:  Rami P Dibbs; Kausar Ali; Shayan M Sarrami; John C Koshy
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 8.  Subcutaneous Versus Submuscular Anterior Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.

Authors:  Chun-Hua Liu; Shi-Qiang Wu; Xiao-Bin Ke; Han-Long Wang; Chang-Xian Chen; Zhan-Long Lai; Zhi-Yong Zhuang; Zhi-Qiang Wu; Qin Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  SUBCUTANEOUS ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME: IS THIS METHOD SAFE AND EFFECTIVE?

Authors:  Sara Lima; João Freitas Correia; Rui Moura Martins; Jorge Miguel Alves; João Palheiras; Carlos de Sousa
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-04

10.  Ulnar nerve entrapment complicating radial head excision.

Authors:  Kevin Parfait Bienvenu Bouhelo-Pam; Espoir Amour Mokoko Louckou; Saeed Abdulrazak; Badarou Chaibou; Hassan Boussakri; Mohamed Shimi; Mohamed El Idrissi; Abdelhalim El Ibrahimi; Abdelmajid El Mrini
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.