Literature DB >> 30907136

Comparison of In Situ Versus Subcutaneous Versus Submuscular Transpositions in the Management of McGowan Stage III Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.

Ali Izadpanah1, Christopher Gibbs1, Robert J Spinner1, Sanjeev Kakar1.   

Abstract

Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of in situ decompression with subcutaneous and submuscular transpositions for surgical management of advanced (McGowan stage III) cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS).
Methods: A retrospective review of patients in our institution undergoing primary surgery for CuTS from February 1989 to May 2009 was performed. Patients with advanced CuTS with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up without any previous bony or soft tissue procedures around the elbow were included. Seventy-four patients underwent 80 primary ulnar nerve surgeries. Patients' demographics, presenting symptoms, physical examination, electrodiagnostic findings, and perioperative complications were recorded. Primary surgical techniques were compared and the risk factors for revision surgery were assessed.
Results: Of the 80 surgical procedures, there were 17 decompressions (21%), 47 subcutaneous transpositions (59%), and 16 submuscular transpositions (20%). Fifty-two percent of patients had resolution of their symptoms after primary surgery. The overall complication rate after primary surgery was 12.5%. Nineteen patients (24%) had revision surgery at a median of 30 months after their primary procedure. Eight patients (42%) had symptomatic improvement after revision surgery. Patients with their dominant extremity affected, static 2-point discrimination (S2PD) greater than 10 mm, and age less than 50 years at presentation had a higher rate of revision surgery. Three patients had a second revision surgery and neurolysis for persistent symptoms. Conclusions: The overall revision rate in advanced CuTS was 24%. Forty-two percent of patients had reported subjective symptomatic improvement after revision surgery. Younger age at presentation and a greater S2PD were associated with a higher rate of revision surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  McGowan III; cubital tunnel syndrome; in situ decompression; subcutaneous transposition; submuscular transposition; ulnar neuropathy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30907136      PMCID: PMC7818036          DOI: 10.1177/1558944719831387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hand (N Y)        ISSN: 1558-9447


  25 in total

1.  Recurrent cubital tunnel syndrome. Etiology and treatment.

Authors:  R Filippi; P Charalampaki; R Reisch; D Koch; P Grunert
Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg       Date:  2001-12

2.  Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Olga Gervasio; Giuseppe Gambardella; Claudio Zaccone; Damiano Branca
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Predictors of surgical revision after in situ decompression of the ulnar nerve.

Authors:  Justin D Krogue; Alexander W Aleem; Daniel A Osei; Charles A Goldfarb; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  The ulnar nerve in elbow trauma.

Authors:  Robert Shin; David Ring
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Simple decompression versus anterior subcutaneous and submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheina A Macadam; Rajiv Gandhi; Michael Bezuhly; Kelly A Lefaivre
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  Delayed electrophysiological recovery after carpal tunnel release for advanced carpal tunnel syndrome: a two-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Takako Kanatani; Hiroyuki Fujioka; Masahiro Kurosaka; Issei Nagura; Masatoshi Sumi
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.177

7.  Carpal tunnel release for advanced disease in patients 70 years and older: does outcome from the patient's perspective justify surgery?

Authors:  M M Tomaino; R W Weiser
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  2001-10

8.  Treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Patient-reported outcome after carpal tunnel release for advanced disease: a prospective and longitudinal assessment in patients older than age 70.

Authors:  Michael E Leit; Robert W Weiser; Matthew M Tomaino
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Hour glass constriction in advanced carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Mohammad Dehghani; Abolghasem Zarezadeh; Hamidreza Shemshaki; Mehdi Moezi; Mohsen Nourbakhsh
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.