Literature DB >> 24252584

Predictors of functional outcomes after simple decompression for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: a multicenter study by the SUN study group.

Patricia B Burns1, H Myra Kim2, R Glenn Gaston3, Steven C Haase1, Warren C Hammert4, Jeffrey N Lawton5, Greg A Merrell6, Paul F Nassab7, Lynda J Yang8, Kevin C Chung9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of surgical outcome for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (UNE).
DESIGN: Prospective cohort followed for 1 year.
SETTING: Clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with UNE (N=55). INTERVENTION: All subjects had simple decompression surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was patient-reported outcomes, such as overall hand function through the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Predictors included age, duration of symptoms, disease severity, and motor conduction velocity across the elbow.
RESULTS: Multiple regression models with change in the overall MHQ score as the dependent variable showed that at 3 months postoperative time, patients with <3 months duration of symptoms showed 12 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-23.5) greater improvement in MHQ scores than those with ≥3 months symptom duration. Less than 3 months of symptoms was again associated with 13 points (95% CI, 2.9-24) greater improvement in MHQ scores at 6 months postoperative, but it was no longer associated with better outcomes at 12 months. A worse baseline MHQ score was associated with significant improvement in MHQ scores at 3 months (coefficient, -0.38; 95% CI, -.67 to -.09), and baseline MHQ score was the only significant predictor of 12 month MHQ scores (coefficient, -.40; 95% CI, -.79 to -.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with <3 months of symptoms and worse baseline MHQ scores showed significantly greater improvement in functional outcomes as reported by the MHQ. However, duration of symptoms was only predictive at 3 or 6 months because most patients recovered within 3 to 6 months after surgery.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome assessment (health care); Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24252584      PMCID: PMC4141550          DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  27 in total

1.  Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release.

Authors:  Ralph E Gay; Peter C Amadio; Jane C Johnson
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 2.  Predictors of surgical outcomes following anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qiyun Shi; Joy C MacDermid; P Lina Santaguida; Hmwe Hmwe Kyu
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 3.  Review of treatment results for ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow.

Authors:  A L Dellon
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  Surgical decompression without transposition for ulnar neuropathy: factors determining outcome.

Authors:  P D LeRoux; T D Ensign; K J Burchiel
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  The management of cubital tunnel syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical studies.

Authors:  A Mowlavi; K Andrews; S Lille; S Verhulst; E G Zook; S Milner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 6.  Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow.

Authors:  Pietro Caliandro; Giuseppe La Torre; Roberto Padua; Fabio Giannini; Luca Padua
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-02-16

7.  Responsiveness of self-reported and objective measures of disease severity in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  J N Katz; R H Gelberman; E A Wright; R A Lew; M H Liang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Reliability and validity testing of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

Authors:  K C Chung; M S Pillsbury; M R Walters; R A Hayward
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Surgical treatment of the ulnar nerve entrapment neuropathy: submuscular anterior transposition or simple decompression of the ulnar nerve? Long-term results in 79 cases.

Authors:  D Bimmler; V E Meyer
Journal:  Ann Chir Main Memb Super       Date:  1996

Review 10.  Surgical management of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow: an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  R H Bartels; T Menovsky; J J Van Overbeeke; W I Verhagen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  4 in total

1.  Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Trends and the Influence of Patient and Surgeon Characteristics.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Lin Zhong; Oluseyi Aliu; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Surgical Treatment of Cubital Tunnel in Pediatric Athletes.

Authors:  Daniel P Quinn; Alex Gu; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Thomas J Fischer; Gregory A Merrell
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2018-03-20

3.  What Is the Impact of Center Variability in a Multicenter International Prospective Observational Study on Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?

Authors:  Kishore Mulpuri; Emily K Schaeffer; Simon P Kelley; Pablo Castañeda; Nicholas M P Clarke; Jose A Herrera-Soto; Vidyadhar Upasani; Unni G Narayanan; Charles T Price
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  The needle electromyography findings in the neurophysiological classification of ulnar neuropathy at the elbow

Authors:  Halit Fidanci; Ilker Öztürk; Ahmet Candan Köylüoğlu; Mehmet Yildiz; Şencan Buturak; Zülfikar Arlier
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 0.973

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.