B Schneider-Wald1, A K von Thaden, M L R Schwarz. 1. Sektion experimentelle Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädisch-Unfallchirurgisches Zentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Deutschland. barbara.schneider@medma.uni-heidelberg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several animal models are available for the analysis of regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals, such as sheep, pigs, goats, dogs and horses. The subchondral bone lamella must be considered when ACT and MACT techniques are examined in order to protect the implant against migration of cells from the bone marrow, although recruitment of cells is often desirable in the regeneration of human cartilage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The defects are mainly positioned at the condyles and the trochlea often bilaterally and spontaneous healing should be excluded. The follow-up period for assessment of the effectiveness of cartilage regeneration is 6-12 months. Shorter observation times up to 12 weeks can be used for pilot studies. Scores based on histological, immunohistological and biochemical staining are mostly used for assessing the regenerated tissue. Biomechanical tests with destructive features need isolated specimens from the animal but modern slice imaging techniques can reflect the progression of the healing processes over the time span of the study in vivo. CONCLUSION: Approaches to standardize the evaluation of the regeneration of articular cartilage have been sporadically described whereas they are required from the point of view of the approval of new concepts for therapy and the protection of animals.
BACKGROUND: Several animal models are available for the analysis of regeneration of articular cartilage in large animals, such as sheep, pigs, goats, dogs and horses. The subchondral bone lamella must be considered when ACT and MACT techniques are examined in order to protect the implant against migration of cells from the bone marrow, although recruitment of cells is often desirable in the regeneration of humancartilage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The defects are mainly positioned at the condyles and the trochlea often bilaterally and spontaneous healing should be excluded. The follow-up period for assessment of the effectiveness of cartilage regeneration is 6-12 months. Shorter observation times up to 12 weeks can be used for pilot studies. Scores based on histological, immunohistological and biochemical staining are mostly used for assessing the regenerated tissue. Biomechanical tests with destructive features need isolated specimens from the animal but modern slice imaging techniques can reflect the progression of the healing processes over the time span of the study in vivo. CONCLUSION: Approaches to standardize the evaluation of the regeneration of articular cartilage have been sporadically described whereas they are required from the point of view of the approval of new concepts for therapy and the protection of animals.
Authors: Martina Schinhan; Martin Gruber; Patrick Vavken; Ronald Dorotka; Leila Samouh; Catharina Chiari; Ruth Gruebl-Barabas; Stefan Nehrer Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2011-08-04 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Caroline Hoemann; Rita Kandel; Sally Roberts; Daniel B F Saris; Laura Creemers; Pierre Mainil-Varlet; Stephane Méthot; Anthony P Hollander; Michael D Buschmann Journal: Cartilage Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Susanna Pilichi; Stefano Rocca; Roy R Pool; Maria Dattena; Gerolamo Masala; Laura Mara; Daniela Sanna; Sara Casu; Maria L Manunta; Andrea Manunta; Eraldo Sanna Passino Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Susanna Pilichi; Stefano Rocca; Maria Dattena; Roy Ransom Pool; Laura Mara; Daniela Sanna; Gerolamo Masala; Maria Lucia Manunta; Simone Dore; Andrea Manunta; Eraldo Sanna Passino Journal: BMC Vet Res Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 2.741
Authors: Markus L Schwarz; Gregor Reisig; Andy Schütte; Kristianna Becker; Susanne Serba; Elmar Forsch; Steffen Thier; Stefan Fickert; Tamara Lenz; Christel Weiß; Svetlana Hetjens; Frederic Bludau; Friederike Bothe; Wiltrud Richter; Barbara Schneider-Wald Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Markus L Schwarz; Barbara Schneider-Wald; Joachim Brade; Dieter Schleich; Andy Schütte; Gregor Reisig Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2015-07-28 Impact factor: 2.359