Literature DB >> 19407448

Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

María Chaparro1, Javier P Gisbert, Lourdes Del Campo, José Cantero, José Maté.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The real accuracy of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is still unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of CTC for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors. SELECTION OF STUDIES: Studiesassessing the accuracy of CTC for the detection of colorectal polyps and tumors were selected. data synthesis: Meta-analyses combining sensitivities, specificities and likelihood ratios (LRs) for the diagnosis of polyps and colorectal tumors were carried out.
RESULTS: Forty-seven studies, providing data of 10,546 patients, were included. Overall per-polyp sensitivity of CTC was 66% (64-68%), for polyps 6-9 mm in size it was 59% (56-61%), and 76% (73-79%) for polyps larger than 9 mm. Overall per-patient sensitivity was 69% (66-72%), for polyps 6-9 mm 60% (56-65%), and 83% (70-85%) for lesions larger than 9 mm. Overall CTC specificity was 83% (81-84%). Positive and negative LRs were 2.9 (1.8-4) and 0.38 (0.27-0.53), respectively; for polyps 6-9 mm in size, they were 3.8 (2.5-5.7) and 0.4 (0.27-0.59), and 12.3 (7.7-19.4) and 0.19 (0.12-0.3) for polyps larger than 9 mm.
CONCLUSION: CTC is highly specific for the detection of colorectal polyps and tumors. Some studies reported high sensitivities, but the results of the studies were highly heterogeneous, while the studied variables explained only part of this discrepancy. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19407448     DOI: 10.1159/000215387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  19 in total

1.  CT colonography before colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. Preliminary experience.

Authors:  L Sali; M Falchini; P Della Monica; D Regge; A G Bonanomi; G Castiglione; G Grazzini; M Zappa; F Mungai; C Volpe; M Mascalchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Application of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detection of proximal lesions of obstructive colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Shusuke Mori; Kazuhiro Oguchi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 2.374

3.  Secondary prevention at 360°: the important role of diagnostic imaging.

Authors:  Anna Micaela Ciarrapico; Guglielmo Manenti; Chiara Pistolese; Sebastiano Fabiano; Roberto Fiori; Andrea Romagnoli; Gianluigi Sergiacomi; Matteo Stefanini; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Lapo Sali; Grazia Grazzini; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-04-26

5.  Colorectal cancer screening: the role of CT colonography.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi; Franco Iafrate; Marco Rengo; Cesare Hassan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Margriet C de Haan; Rogier E van Gelder; Anno Graser; Shandra Bipat; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Bellini; Marco Rengo; Carlo Nicola De Cecco; Franco Iafrate; Cesare Hassan; Andrea Laghi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The potential of imaging techniques as a screening tool for colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Marjolein J E Greuter; Johannes Berkhof; Remond J A Fijneman; Erhan Demirel; Jie-Bin Lew; Gerrit A Meijer; Jaap Stoker; Veerle M H Coupé
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.