Literature DB >> 28447326

CT colonography: role in FOBT-based screening programs for colorectal cancer.

Lapo Sali1, Grazia Grazzini2, Mario Mascalchi3.   

Abstract

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) is a minimally invasive imaging examination for the colon, and is safe, well tolerated and accurate for the detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenoma. While the role of CTC as a primary test for population screening of CRC is under investigation, the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has been recommended for population screening of CRC in Europe. Subjects with positive FOBT are invited to undergo total colonoscopy, which has some critical issues, such as suboptimal compliance, contraindications and the possibility of an incomplete exploration of the colon. Based on available data, the integration of CTC in FOBT-based population screening programs for CRC may fall into three scenarios. First, CTC is recommended in FOBT-positive subjects when colonoscopy is refused, incomplete or contraindicated. For these indications CTC should replace double-contrast barium enema. Second, conversely, CTC is not currently recommended as a second-level examination prior to colonoscopy in all FOBT-positive subjects, as this strategy is most probably not cost-effective. Finally, CTC may be considered instead of colonoscopy for surveillance after adenoma removal, but specific studies are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT colonography; Colorectal cancer screening; Fecal immunochemical test; Fecal occult blood test

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28447326     DOI: 10.1007/s12328-017-0744-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1865-7265


  60 in total

1.  Screening for colorectal cancer in Italy, 2009 survey.

Authors:  Manuel Zorzi; Susanna Baracco; Chiara Fedato; Grazia Grazzini; Priscilla Sassoli De' Bianchi; Carlo Senore; Carmen Beatriz Visioli; Carla Cogo
Journal:  Epidemiol Prev       Date:  2011 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.901

Review 2.  Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Cesare Hassan; Steve Halligan; Riccardo Marmo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J D Hardcastle; J O Chamberlain; M H Robinson; S M Moss; S S Amar; T W Balfour; P D James; C M Mangham
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-30       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up.

Authors:  M Neerincx; J S Terhaar sive Droste; C J Mulder; M Räkers; J F Bartelsman; R J Loffeld; H A Tuynman; R M Brohet; R W van der Hulst
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012.

Authors:  J Ferlay; E Steliarova-Foucher; J Lortet-Tieulent; S Rosso; J W W Coebergh; H Comber; D Forman; F Bray
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Factors associated with referral compliance of abnormal immunochemical faecal occult blood test.

Authors:  Chia-Ming Li; Ming-Neng Shiu; Shu-Li Chia; Jen-Pei Liu; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; Wei-Chu Chie
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.136

7.  CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Jacob Sosna; Martina M Morrin; Jonathan B Kruskal; Philip T Lavin; Max P Rosen; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors:  Steve Halligan; Kate Wooldrage; Edward Dadswell; Ines Kralj-Hans; Christian von Wagner; Rob Edwards; Guiqing Yao; Clive Kay; David Burling; Omar Faiz; Julian Teare; Richard J Lilford; Dion Morton; Jane Wardle; Wendy Atkin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilot.

Authors:  S M Moss; C Campbell; J Melia; D Coleman; S Smith; R Parker; P Ramsell; J Patnick; D P Weller
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  M H Liedenbaum; A F van Rijn; A H de Vries; H M Dekker; M Thomeer; C J van Marrewijk; L Hol; M G W Dijkgraaf; P Fockens; P M M Bossuyt; E Dekker; J Stoker
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  3 in total

1.  Preference and Experience of Colonic Examination for Participants Presenting to Hospitals with a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test Result.

Authors:  Takashi Kato; Koichi Nagata; Junta Yamamichi; Soichi Tanaka; Tetsuro Honda; Norihito Shimizu; Kenichi Utano; Michiaki Hirayama; Hiroshi Matsumoto; Shoichi Horita
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 2.  Colorectal Cancer Screening: The Role of Psychological, Social and Background Factors in Decision-making Process.

Authors:  Giulia Cossu; Luca Saba; Luigi Minerba; Mario Mascalchi
Journal:  Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health       Date:  2018-03-21

3.  Could a Behavioral Model Explain Adherence to Second-Level Colonoscopy for Colon Cancer Screening? Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of the Palermo Province Population.

Authors:  Giuseppa Minutolo; Palmira Immordino; Alessia Dolce; Mario Valenza; Emanuele Amodio; Walter Mazzucco; Alessandra Casuccio; Vincenzo Restivo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.