OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess coronary arterial remodeling as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis using coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an asymptomatic population-based cohort. BACKGROUND: In early atherosclerosis, compensatory enlargement of both the outer wall of the vessel as well as the lumen, termed compensatory enlargement or positive remodeling, occurs before luminal narrowing. METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) trial were evaluated using black-blood coronary wall MRI. Coronary cross-sectional area (vessel size), lumen area, and mean wall thickness of the proximal coronary arteries were measured. RESULTS: Men had a greater vessel size, lumen area, and mean wall thickness than women (38.3 +/- 11.3 mm2 vs. 32.6 +/- 9.4 mm2, 6.7 +/- 3.2 mm2 vs. 5.3 +/- 2.4 mm2, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 mm vs. 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant coronary artery narrowing was present by magnetic resonance angiography. Overall, coronary vessel size increased 25.9 mm2 per millimeter increase in coronary wall thickness, whereas lumen area increased only slightly at 3.1 mm2 for every millimeter increase in wall thickness (difference in slopes, p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, participants with an Agatston score >0 were more likely to have wall thickness >2.0 mm (odds ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary wall MRI detected positive arterial remodeling in asymptomatic men and women with subclinical atherosclerosis.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess coronary arterial remodeling as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis using coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in an asymptomatic population-based cohort. BACKGROUND: In early atherosclerosis, compensatory enlargement of both the outer wall of the vessel as well as the lumen, termed compensatory enlargement or positive remodeling, occurs before luminal narrowing. METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine participants in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) trial were evaluated using black-blood coronary wall MRI. Coronary cross-sectional area (vessel size), lumen area, and mean wall thickness of the proximal coronary arteries were measured. RESULTS:Men had a greater vessel size, lumen area, and mean wall thickness than women (38.3 +/- 11.3 mm2 vs. 32.6 +/- 9.4 mm2, 6.7 +/- 3.2 mm2 vs. 5.3 +/- 2.4 mm2, and 2.0 +/- 0.3 mm vs. 1.9 +/- 0.3 mm, respectively, p < 0.05). No significant coronary artery narrowing was present by magnetic resonance angiography. Overall, coronary vessel size increased 25.9 mm2 per millimeter increase in coronary wall thickness, whereas lumen area increased only slightly at 3.1 mm2 for every millimeter increase in wall thickness (difference in slopes, p < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and sex, participants with an Agatston score >0 were more likely to have wall thickness >2.0 mm (odds ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 3.84). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary wall MRI detected positive arterial remodeling in asymptomatic men and women with subclinical atherosclerosis.
Authors: J Jeffrey Carr; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Nathan D Wong; Michael McNitt-Gray; Yadon Arad; David R Jacobs; Stephan Sidney; Diane E Bild; O Dale Williams; Robert C Detrano Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: G Sangiorgi; J A Rumberger; A Severson; W D Edwards; J Gregoire; L A Fitzpatrick; R S Schwartz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: D D McPherson; S J Sirna; L F Hiratzka; L Thorpe; M L Armstrong; M L Marcus; R E Kerber Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Steven E Nissen; E Murat Tuzcu; Paul Schoenhagen; B Greg Brown; Peter Ganz; Robert A Vogel; Tim Crowe; Gail Howard; Christopher J Cooper; Bruce Brodie; Cindy L Grines; Anthony N DeMaria Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: J B Hermiller; A N Tenaglia; K B Kisslo; H R Phillips; T M Bashore; R S Stack; C J Davidson Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1993-03-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Diane E Bild; David A Bluemke; Gregory L Burke; Robert Detrano; Ana V Diez Roux; Aaron R Folsom; Philip Greenland; David R Jacob; Richard Kronmal; Kiang Liu; Jennifer Clark Nelson; Daniel O'Leary; Mohammed F Saad; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; Russell P Tracy Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Jian Xu; Kelly Anne McGorty; Ruth P Lim; Mary Bruno; James S Babb; Monvadi B Srichai; Daniel Kim; Daniel K Sodickson Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Khaled Z Abd-Elmoniem; Aylin B Unsal; Sarah Eshera; Jatin R Matta; Nancy Muldoon; Dorothea McAreavey; Julia B Purdy; Rohan Hazra; Colleen Hadigan; Ahmed M Gharib Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; James C Carr Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Kai Lin; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ying Liu; Biao Lu; Huadan Xue; Yining Wang; Debiao Li; James C Carr Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-10-30 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Suzanne C Gerretsen; M Eline Kooi; Alfons G Kessels; Simon Schalla; Marcus Katoh; Rob J van der Geest; Warren J Manning; Johannes Waltenberger; Jos M A van Engelshoven; Rene M Botnar; Tim Leiner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 3.240