Yibin Xie1, Hang Jin1,2, Mengsu Zeng2, Debiao Li3,4. 1. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Feng Lin Road, Shanghai, China. 3. Biomedical Imaging Research Institute, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., PACT Suite 400, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. debiao.li@cshs.org. 4. Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. debiao.li@cshs.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This short review summarizes the recent development in clinical and experimental imaging techniques for coronary atherosclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary atherosclerosis is the underlying disease of myocardial infarction, the leading cause of death in the industrialized world. Conventional ways of risk assessment, including evaluation of traditional risk factors and interrogation of luminal stenosis, have proven imprecise for the prediction of major events. Rapid advances in noninvasive imaging techniques including MRI, CT, and PET, as well as catheter-based methods, have opened the doors to more in-depth interrogation of plaque burden, composition, and many crucial pathological processes such as inflammation and hemorrhage. These emerging imaging modalities and methodologies, combined with conventional imaging evidences of anatomy and ischemia, offer the promises to provide comprehensive information of the disease status. There is tremendous clinical potential for imaging to improve the current management of coronary atherosclerosis, including the identification of high-risk patients for aggressive therapies and guiding personalized treatment. In this review, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art coronary plaque imaging techniques focusing on their respective strengths and weaknesses, as well as their clinical outlook.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This short review summarizes the recent development in clinical and experimental imaging techniques for coronary atherosclerosis. RECENT FINDINGS:Coronary atherosclerosis is the underlying disease of myocardial infarction, the leading cause of death in the industrialized world. Conventional ways of risk assessment, including evaluation of traditional risk factors and interrogation of luminal stenosis, have proven imprecise for the prediction of major events. Rapid advances in noninvasive imaging techniques including MRI, CT, and PET, as well as catheter-based methods, have opened the doors to more in-depth interrogation of plaque burden, composition, and many crucial pathological processes such as inflammation and hemorrhage. These emerging imaging modalities and methodologies, combined with conventional imaging evidences of anatomy and ischemia, offer the promises to provide comprehensive information of the disease status. There is tremendous clinical potential for imaging to improve the current management of coronary atherosclerosis, including the identification of high-risk patients for aggressive therapies and guiding personalized treatment. In this review, we provide an overview of the state-of-the-art coronary plaque imaging techniques focusing on their respective strengths and weaknesses, as well as their clinical outlook.
Authors: Tobias Saam; Thomas S Hatsukami; Norihide Takaya; Baocheng Chu; Hunter Underhill; William S Kerwin; Jianming Cai; Marina S Ferguson; Chun Yuan Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Juliano Lara Fernandes; Carlos Vicente Serrano; Maria Heloisa S L Blotta; Otavio Rizzi Coelho; Jose Carlos Nicolau; Luis Francisco Avila; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Jose Rodrigues Parga Filho Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Robert Detrano; Alan D Guerci; J Jeffrey Carr; Diane E Bild; Gregory Burke; Aaron R Folsom; Kiang Liu; Steven Shea; Moyses Szklo; David A Bluemke; Daniel H O'Leary; Russell Tracy; Karol Watson; Nathan D Wong; Richard A Kronmal Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-03-27 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Aikawa; E Rabkin; Y Okada; S J Voglic; S K Clinton; C E Brinckerhoff; G K Sukhova; P Libby Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-06-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan R Moody; Rachael E Murphy; Paul S Morgan; Anne L Martel; G S Delay; Steve Allder; Shane T MacSweeney; William G Tennant; John Gladman; John Lowe; Beverley J Hunt Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Agnese Irkle; Alex T Vesey; David Y Lewis; Jeremy N Skepper; Joseph L E Bird; Marc R Dweck; Francis R Joshi; Ferdia A Gallagher; Elizabeth A Warburton; Martin R Bennett; Kevin M Brindle; David E Newby; James H Rudd; Anthony P Davenport Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-07-07 Impact factor: 14.919