Literature DB >> 19405629

Absolute FKBP binding affinities obtained via nonequilibrium unbinding simulations.

F Marty Ytreberg1.   

Abstract

We compute the absolute binding affinities for two ligands bound to the FKBP protein using nonequilibrium unbinding simulations. The methodology is straightforward requiring little or no modification to many modern molecular simulation packages. The approach makes use of a physical pathway, eliminating the need for complicated alchemical decoupling schemes. We compare our nonequilibrium results to those obtained via a fully equilibrium approach and to experiment. The results of this study suggest that to obtain accurate results using nonequilibrium approaches one should use the stiff-spring approximation with the second cumulant expansion. From this study we conclude that nonequilibrium simulation could provide a simple means to estimate protein-ligand binding affinities.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19405629      PMCID: PMC2905451          DOI: 10.1063/1.3119261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Phys        ISSN: 0021-9606            Impact factor:   3.488


  39 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Theory of a systematic computational error in free energy differences.

Authors:  Daniel M Zuckerman; Thomas B Woolf
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 9.161

3.  Single-step perturbations to calculate free energy differences from unphysical reference states: limits on size, flexibility, and character.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.376

4.  PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  Alexander W Schüttelkopf; Daan M F van Aalten
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2004-07-21

5.  Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium measurements using maximum-likelihood methods.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Eric Bair; Giles Hooker; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Evaluating the molecular mechanics poisson-boltzmann surface area free energy method using a congeneric series of ligands to p38 MAP kinase.

Authors:  David A Pearlman
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Comparison of efficiency and bias of free energies computed by exponential averaging, the Bennett acceptance ratio, and thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Parallelized-over-parts computation of absolute binding free energy with docking and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Guha Jayachandran; Michael R Shirts; Sanghyun Park; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  On the use of orientational restraints and symmetry corrections in alchemical free energy calculations.

Authors:  David L Mobley; John D Chodera; Ken A Dill
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2006-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

10.  Ligand escape pathways and (un)binding free energy calculations for the hexameric insulin-phenol complex.

Authors:  Harish Vashisth; Cameron F Abrams
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

View more
  17 in total

1.  Accelerated convergence of molecular free energy via superposition approximation-based reference states.

Authors:  Sandeep Somani; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  The cis conformation of proline leads to weaker binding of a p53 peptide to MDM2 compared to trans.

Authors:  Yingqian Ada Zhan; F Marty Ytreberg
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.013

3.  Computational study of small molecule binding for both tethered and free conditions.

Authors:  F Marty Ytreberg
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 4.  Alchemical free energy methods for drug discovery: progress and challenges.

Authors:  John D Chodera; David L Mobley; Michael R Shirts; Richard W Dixon; Kim Branson; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 5.  Predicting Binding Free Energies: Frontiers and Benchmarks.

Authors:  David L Mobley; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 12.981

6.  Assessing potential inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease from available drugs using free energy perturbation simulations.

Authors:  Son Tung Ngo; Hung Minh Nguyen; Le Thi Thuy Huong; Pham Minh Quan; Vi Khanh Truong; Nguyen Thanh Tung; Van V Vu
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.036

7.  Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.

Authors:  Lin Frank Song; Nupur Bansal; Zheng Zheng; Kenneth M Merz
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  Overcoming dissipation in the calculation of standard binding free energies by ligand extraction.

Authors:  Camilo Velez-Vega; Michael K Gilson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 3.376

9.  Investigation of indazole unbinding pathways in CYP2E1 by molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Zhonghua Shen; Feixiong Cheng; You Xu; Jing Fu; Wen Xiao; Jie Shen; Guixia Liu; Weihua Li; Yun Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accurate calculation of the absolute free energy of binding for drug molecules.

Authors:  Matteo Aldeghi; Alexander Heifetz; Michael J Bodkin; Stefan Knapp; Philip C Biggin
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 9.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.