Literature DB >> 19403538

Group differences in the heritability of items and test scores.

Jelte M Wicherts1, Wendy Johnson.   

Abstract

It is important to understand potential sources of group differences in the heritability of intelligence test scores. On the basis of a basic item response model we argue that heritabilities which are based on dichotomous item scores normally do not generalize from one sample to the next. If groups differ in mean ability, the functioning of items at different ability levels may result in group differences in the heritability of items, even when these items function equivalently across groups and the heritability of the underlying ability is equal across groups. We illustrate this graphically, by computer simulation, and by focusing on several problems associated with a recent study by Rushton et al. who argued that the heritability estimates of items of Raven's Progressive Matrices test in North-American twin samples generalized to other population groups, and hence that the population group differences on this test of general mental ability (or intelligence) had a substantial genetic component. Our results show that item heritabilities are strongly dependent on the group on which the heritabilities were based. Rushton et al.'s results were artefactual and do not speak to the nature of population group differences in intelligence test performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19403538      PMCID: PMC2686655          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Implications of absence of measurement invariance for detecting sex limitation and genotype by environment interaction.

Authors:  Gitta H Lubke; Conor V Dolan; Michael C Neale
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2004-06

2.  Problems with using sum scores for estimating variance components: contamination and measurement noninvariance.

Authors:  Michael C Neale; Gitta Lubke; Steven H Aggen; Conor V Dolan
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.587

3.  Estimation of variance components for age at menarche in twin families.

Authors:  Carl A Anderson; David L Duffy; Nicholas G Martin; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  The Minnesota Twin Family Registry: some initial findings.

Authors:  D T Lykken; T J Bouchard; M McGue; A Tellegen
Journal:  Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma)       Date:  1990

5.  Education policy and the heritability of educational attainment.

Authors:  A C Heath; K Berg; L J Eaves; M H Solaas; L A Corey; J Sundet; P Magnus; W E Nance
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Apr 25-May 1       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  The Minnesota Twin Registry: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Robert F Krueger; Wendy Johnson
Journal:  Twin Res       Date:  2002-10

7.  Variance decomposition using an IRT measurement model.

Authors:  Stéphanie M van den Berg; Cees A W Glas; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.805

8.  Genetic and environmental contributions to population group differences on the Raven's Progressive Matrices estimated from twins reared together and apart.

Authors:  J Philippe Rushton; Trudy Ann Bons; Philip A Vernon; Jelena Cvorović
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total
  4 in total

1.  Heritability across the distribution: an application of quantile regression.

Authors:  Jessica A R Logan; Stephen A Petrill; Sara A Hart; Christopher Schatschneider; Lee A Thompson; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Laura S DeThorne; Christopher Bartlett
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  Folk Classification and Factor Rotations: Whales, Sharks, and the Problems With the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP).

Authors:  Gerald J Haeffel; Bertus F Jeronimus; Bonnie N Kaiser; Lesley Jo Weaver; Peter D Soyster; Aaron J Fisher; Ivan Vargas; Jason T Goodson; Wei Lu
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-05-18

3.  Phenotypic complexity, measurement bias, and poor phenotypic resolution contribute to the missing heritability problem in genetic association studies.

Authors:  Sophie van der Sluis; Matthijs Verhage; Danielle Posthuma; Conor V Dolan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The Negative Religiousness-IQ Nexus is a Jensen Effect on Individual-Level Data: A Refutation of Dutton et al.'s 'The Myth of the Stupid Believer'.

Authors:  Edward Dutton; Emil Kirkegaard
Journal:  J Relig Health       Date:  2021-07-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.