Literature DB >> 19402809

Demographic associations with stage of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer.

Amy Duncan1, Carlene Wilson, Stephen R Cole, Antonina Mikocka-Walus, Deborah Turnbull, Graeme P Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the distribution of a population in southern urban Adelaide in terms of readiness to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) by Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) or colonoscopy according to the stages in the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) of behaviour change and to compare the stages according to demographic variables.
METHODS: A random sample of 664 South Australians aged 50 to 74 were surveyed in June 2006. Chi-squared analyses were performed to determine if statistically significant differences on demographic variables existed between participants at different stages of readiness to screen.
RESULTS: The precontemplation and contemplation stages when combined equated to more than half of the total respondents. Several significant differences were identified between the stages. Those in both the precontemplation and contemplation stages were older than those in the remaining stages and also had a significantly higher proportion of women when compared to the action stage. In the precontemplation stage there were significantly more respondents for whom English was a second language, and low levels of private health insurance, whereas the contemplation stage had the highest proportion of Australian-born respondents. Interestingly, levels of private health insurance were also low among those who intended to screen with colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The majority of the population were not found to have progressed beyond contemplation. Certain demographic characteristics varied significantly between people at different stages of readiness to screen for CRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19402809     DOI: 10.1071/he09007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  6 in total

1.  The Effects of the Nurse Navigation Program in Promoting Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elif Temucin; Nursen O Nahcivan
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Exploring the validity of the continuum of resistance model for discriminating early from late and non-uptake of colorectal cancer screening: implications for the design of invitation and reminder letters.

Authors:  Tess Gregory; Stephen R Cole; Carlene J Wilson; Ingrid H Flight; Ian T Zajac; Deborah Turnbull; Graeme P Young
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2013-12

3.  Processes of Change for Colonoscopy: Limited Support for Use Among Navigated Latinos.

Authors:  Gina Cotter; Katherine DuHamel; Elizabeth Schofield; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-10-09

4.  Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Tess A Gregory; Carlene Wilson; Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Stephen R Cole; Graeme Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Cognitive-behavioural therapy has no effect on disease activity but improves quality of life in subgroups of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Antonina Mikocka-Walus; Peter Bampton; David Hetzel; Patrick Hughes; Adrian Esterman; Jane M Andrews
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-05-02       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Individual- and provider-level factors associated with colorectal cancer screening in accordance with guideline recommendation: a community-level perspective across varying levels of risk.

Authors:  Ryan J Courtney; Christine L Paul; Robert W Sanson-Fisher; Finlay A Macrae; Mariko L Carey; John Attia; Mark McEvoy
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.