Literature DB >> 19401906

Ionising radiation and cancer risks: what have we learned from epidemiology?

Ethel S Gilbert1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Epidemiologic studies of persons exposed to ionising radiation offer a wealth of information on cancer risks in humans. The Life Span Study cohort of Japanese A-bomb survivors, a large cohort that includes all ages and both sexes with a wide range of well-characterised doses, is the primary resource for estimating carcinogenic risks from low linear energy transfer external exposure. Extensive data on persons exposed for therapeutic or diagnostic medical reasons offer the opportunity to study fractionated exposure, risks at high therapeutic doses, and risks of site-specific cancers in non-Japanese populations. Studies of persons exposed for occupational and environmental reasons allow a direct evaluation of exposure at low doses and dose rates, and also provide information on different types of radiation such as radon and iodine-131. This article summarises the findings from these studies with emphasis on studies with well-characterised doses.
CONCLUSIONS: Epidemiologic studies provide the necessary data for quantifying cancer risks as a function of dose and for setting radiation protection standards. Leukaemia and most solid cancers have been linked with radiation. Most solid cancer data are reasonably well described by linear-dose response functions although there may be a downturn in risks at very high doses. Persons exposed early in life have especially high relative risks for many cancers, and radiation-related risk of solid cancers appears to persist throughout life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19401906      PMCID: PMC2859619          DOI: 10.1080/09553000902883836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  92 in total

1.  Invited commentary: studies of workers exposed to low doses of radiation.

Authors:  E S Gilbert
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Breast cancer incidence in U.S. radiologic technologists.

Authors:  Michele Morin Doody; D Michal Freedman; Bruce H Alexander; Michael Hauptmann; Jeremy S Miller; R Sowmya Rao; Kiyohiko Mabuchi; Elaine Ron; Alice J Sigurdson; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Some statistical implications of dose uncertainty in radiation dose-response analyses.

Authors:  Daniel W Schafer; Ethel S Gilbert
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Leukaemia and aplastic anaemia in patients irradiated for ankylosing spondylitis. 1957.

Authors:  W M Court-Brown; R Doll
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 1.394

5.  In-utero exposed atomic bomb survivors: cancer risk update.

Authors:  Y Yoshimoto; R Delongchamp; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-07-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of radiation on incidence of primary liver cancer among atomic bomb survivors.

Authors:  J B Cologne; S Tokuoka; G W Beebe; T Fukuhara; K Mabuchi
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Risk of cancer after low doses of ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study in 15 countries.

Authors:  E Cardis; M Vrijheid; M Blettner; E Gilbert; M Hakama; C Hill; G Howe; J Kaldor; C R Muirhead; M Schubauer-Berigan; T Yoshimura; F Bermann; G Cowper; J Fix; C Hacker; B Heinmiller; M Marshall; I Thierry-Chef; D Utterback; Y-O Ahn; E Amoros; P Ashmore; A Auvinen; J-M Bae; J Bernar Solano; A Biau; E Combalot; P Deboodt; A Diez Sacristan; M Eklof; H Engels; G Engholm; G Gulis; R Habib; K Holan; H Hyvonen; A Kerekes; J Kurtinaitis; H Malker; M Martuzzi; A Mastauskas; A Monnet; M Moser; M S Pearce; D B Richardson; F Rodriguez-Artalejo; A Rogel; H Tardy; M Telle-Lamberton; I Turai; M Usel; K Veress
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-29

8.  Lung cancer mortality between 1950 and 1987 after exposure to fractionated moderate-dose-rate ionizing radiation in the Canadian fluoroscopy cohort study and a comparison with lung cancer mortality in the Atomic Bomb survivors study.

Authors:  G R Howe
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.841

9.  Relationship of leukemia risk to radiation dose following cancer of the uterine corpus.

Authors:  R E Curtis; J D Boice; M Stovall; L Bernstein; E Holowaty; S Karjalainen; F Langmark; P C Nasca; A G Schwartz; M J Schymura
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-09-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Ionizing radiation and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Steve Wing; Jane Schroeder; Inge Schmitz-Feuerhake; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative modeling of chronic myeloid leukemia: insights from radiobiology.

Authors:  Tomas Radivoyevitch; Lynn Hlatky; Julian Landaw; Rainer K Sachs
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  A U.S. Multicenter Study of Recorded Occupational Radiation Badge Doses in Nuclear Medicine.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; R Craig Yoder; Christopher Passmore; Marie-Odile Bernier; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Photon energy readings in OSL dosimeter filters: an application to retrospective dose estimation for nuclear medicine workers.

Authors:  Daphnée Villoing; Cari M Kitahara; Christopher Passmore; Steven L Simon; R Craig Yoder
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.394

4.  An analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms of 125 DNA repair genes in the Texas genome-wide association study of lung cancer with a replication for the XRCC4 SNPs.

Authors:  Hongping Yu; Hui Zhao; Li-E Wang; Younghun Han; Wei V Chen; Christopher I Amos; Thorunn Rafnar; Patrick Sulem; Kari Stefansson; Maria Teresa Landi; Neil Caporaso; Demetrius Albanes; Michael Thun; James D McKay; Paul Brennan; Yufei Wang; Richard S Houlston; Margaret R Spitz; Qingyi Wei
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2011-02-05

5.  Linear No-Threshold Model VS. Radiation Hormesis.

Authors:  Mohan Doss
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 6.  Evolved Cellular Mechanisms to Respond to Genotoxic Insults: Implications for Radiation-Induced Hematologic Malignancies.

Authors:  Courtney J Fleenor; Kelly Higa; Michael M Weil; James DeGregori
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Implications of genotypic differences in the generation of a urinary metabolomics radiation signature.

Authors:  Evagelia C Laiakis; Evan L Pannkuk; Maria Elena Diaz-Rubio; Yi-Wen Wang; Tytus D Mak; Cynthia M Simbulan-Rosenthal; David J Brenner; Albert J Fornace
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Historical Patterns in the Types of Procedures Performed and Radiation Safety Practices Used in Nuclear Medicine From 1945-2009.

Authors:  Miriam E Van Dyke; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Michele M Doody; Hyeyeun Lim; Norman E Bolus; Steven L Simon; Bruce H Alexander; Cari M Kitahara
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Female breast cancer risk in Bryansk Oblast, Russia, following prolonged low dose rate exposure to radiation from the Chernobyl power station accident.

Authors:  Nikolai Rivkind; Valeriy Stepanenko; Irina Belukha; Jamie Guenthoer; Kenneth J Kopecky; Sergei Kulikov; Irina Kurnosova; Lynn Onstad; Peggy Porter; Nikita Shklovskiy-Kordi; Vladislav Troshin; Paul Voillequé; Scott Davis
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Cancer incidence after childhood irradiation for tinea capitis in a Portuguese cohort.

Authors:  Luís Antunes; Maria José Bento; Manuel Sobrinho-Simões; Paula Soares; Paula Boaventura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.