BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma has few effective treatments, one being cytoreductive surgery. We previously developed a gene ratio test to predict outcome of malignant pleural mesothelioma patients undergoing surgery. In this study, we investigated the predictive value and technical assay performance of this test in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained prospectively from 120 consecutive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who were scheduled for debulking surgery at one institution. Specimens were obtained at surgery or by pleural biopsy examination. Expression data for four genes were collected from tumor specimens, and three ratios of gene expression (TM4SF1/PKM2, TM4SF1/ARHGDIA, and COBLL1/ARHGDIA) were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patients were assigned to good or poor outcome groups by the gene ratio test. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test in univariate analyses. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for prognostic factors. Technical robustness was determined by using up to 30 specimens per patient, two biopsy techniques, and two performance sites. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The test predicted overall survival (P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .007) in univariate analysis and overall survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for death = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 3.45, P = .004). The test was reproducible within patients and repeatable between two determinations for specimens with widely varying tumor cell contents. Repeatability between two determinations was 88.5% (95% CI = 84.0% to 92.2%) or, when technically unacceptable test values were excluded, 91.9% (95% CI = 87.4% to 95.1%). Reproducibility between two determinations was 96.1% (95% CI = 86.5% to 99.5%). Combining the gene ratio test and other prognostic factors allowed prospective discrimination between patients at high risk (median survival = 6.9 months, 95% CI = 2.6 to 8.9 months; 3-year survival = 0%) and low risk (median survival = 31.9 months, 95% CI = 21.9 to 41.7 months; 3-year survival = 42%). CONCLUSION: The gene ratio test for survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma has robust predictive value and technical assay performance.
BACKGROUND:Malignant pleural mesothelioma has few effective treatments, one being cytoreductive surgery. We previously developed a gene ratio test to predict outcome of malignant pleural mesotheliomapatients undergoing surgery. In this study, we investigated the predictive value and technical assay performance of this test in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Clinical data were obtained prospectively from 120 consecutive patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who were scheduled for debulking surgery at one institution. Specimens were obtained at surgery or by pleural biopsy examination. Expression data for four genes were collected from tumor specimens, and three ratios of gene expression (TM4SF1/PKM2, TM4SF1/ARHGDIA, and COBLL1/ARHGDIA) were determined by quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Patients were assigned to good or poor outcome groups by the gene ratio test. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test in univariate analyses. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to control for prognostic factors. Technical robustness was determined by using up to 30 specimens per patient, two biopsy techniques, and two performance sites. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The test predicted overall survival (P < .001) and cancer-specific survival (P = .007) in univariate analysis and overall survival in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio for death = 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27 to 3.45, P = .004). The test was reproducible within patients and repeatable between two determinations for specimens with widely varying tumor cell contents. Repeatability between two determinations was 88.5% (95% CI = 84.0% to 92.2%) or, when technically unacceptable test values were excluded, 91.9% (95% CI = 87.4% to 95.1%). Reproducibility between two determinations was 96.1% (95% CI = 86.5% to 99.5%). Combining the gene ratio test and other prognostic factors allowed prospective discrimination between patients at high risk (median survival = 6.9 months, 95% CI = 2.6 to 8.9 months; 3-year survival = 0%) and low risk (median survival = 31.9 months, 95% CI = 21.9 to 41.7 months; 3-year survival = 42%). CONCLUSION: The gene ratio test for survival of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma has robust predictive value and technical assay performance.
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Roderick V Jensen; Li-Li Hsiao; Steven R Gullans; Joshua E Blumenstock; Sridhar Ramaswamy; William G Richards; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Raphael Bueno; Jason Reblando; Jonathan Glickman; Michael T Jaklitsch; Jeanne M Lukanich; David J Sugarbaker Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Nicholas J Vogelzang; James J Rusthoven; James Symanowski; Claude Denham; E Kaukel; Pierre Ruffie; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Michael Boyer; Salih Emri; Christian Manegold; Clet Niyikiza; Paolo Paoletti Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; William G Richards; David J Sugarbaker; Michael T Jaklitsch; Raphael Bueno Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Marc J van de Vijver; Yudong D He; Laura J van't Veer; Hongyue Dai; Augustinus A M Hart; Dorien W Voskuil; George J Schreiber; Johannes L Peterse; Chris Roberts; Matthew J Marton; Mark Parrish; Douwe Atsma; Anke Witteveen; Annuska Glas; Leonie Delahaye; Tony van der Velde; Harry Bartelink; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Emiel T Rutgers; Stephen H Friend; René Bernards Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-12-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Roderick V Jensen; Li-Li Hsiao; Steven R Gullans; Joshua E Blumenstock; William G Richards; Michael T Jaklitsch; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2003-04-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: W G Richards; S B Van Oss; J N Glickman; L R Chirieac; B Yeap; L Dong; G J Gordon; H Mercer; K K Gill; A Imrich; R Bueno; D J Sugarbaker Journal: Biotech Histochem Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 1.718
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; Beow Y Yeap; Edmund S Cibas; William G Richards; Lingsheng Dong; Ritu R Gill; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Sheelu Varghese; Zhaorong Chen; David L Bartlett; James F Pingpank; Steven K Libutti; Seth M Steinberg; John Wunderlich; H Richard Alexander Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; William G Richards; Beow Y Yeap; Melissa H Coleman; Peter E Sugarbaker; Lucian R Chirieac; Yaoyu E Wang; John Quackenbush; Roderick V Jensen; Raphael Bueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Raphael Bueno; Assunta De Rienzo; Lingsheng Dong; Gavin J Gordon; Colin F Hercus; William G Richards; Roderick V Jensen; Arif Anwar; Gautam Maulik; Lucian R Chirieac; Kim-Fong Ho; Bruce E Taillon; Cynthia L Turcotte; Robert G Hercus; Steven R Gullans; David J Sugarbaker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Anne S Tsao; Nusrat Harun; Junya Fujimoto; Vikki Devito; J Jack Lee; Elisabetta Kuhn; Reza Mehran; David Rice; Cesar Moran; Waun Ki Hong; Li Shen; Milind Suraokar; Ignacio Wistuba Journal: Ann Diagn Pathol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 2.090