Raphael Bueno1, Kevin R Loughlin, Martha H Powell, Gavin J Gordon. 1. Thoracic Surgery Oncology Laboratory and Division of Thoracic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115,USA. rbueno@partners.org
Abstract
PURPOSE: Multiple recent studies show excellent classification accuracy using bioinformatics tools applied to expression profiling data on various tumors. However, the clinical applicability of these techniques remains unfulfilled because of difficulty in translating complex multigene mathematical algorithms into reproducible, platform independent tests. We recently developed a broadly applicable platform independent method based on simple ratios of gene expression to diagnose and predict outcome in cancer. In the current study we applied this technique to the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a ratio based predictive model using a training set of 32 samples with previously published gene profiling data. We then tested and refined the model using additional independent samples with previously published microarray data from another source (that is the test set of 34 samples). Finally, the optimal ratio based test was examined with quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for data acquisition in a third cohort of samples consisting of 10 frozen normal and 10 tumor prostate tissues. RESULTS: A 3-ratio test using 4 genes was 90% accurate (18 of 20 samples) for distinguishing normal prostate and prostate cancer samples obtained at surgery (Fisher's exact test p = 0.0007). This test did not result in any false-negative findings. CONCLUSIONS: We describe and validate a new gene ratio based test for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, which was developed from the analysis of extensive gene profiling data for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This test can be easily adapted to the clinical arena without the need for complex computer software or hardware. We anticipate that the gene ratio based diagnosis of prostate cancer using fine needle aspirations could serve as a useful adjunct to standard histopathological techniques.
PURPOSE: Multiple recent studies show excellent classification accuracy using bioinformatics tools applied to expression profiling data on various tumors. However, the clinical applicability of these techniques remains unfulfilled because of difficulty in translating complex multigene mathematical algorithms into reproducible, platform independent tests. We recently developed a broadly applicable platform independent method based on simple ratios of gene expression to diagnose and predict outcome in cancer. In the current study we applied this technique to the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We developed a ratio based predictive model using a training set of 32 samples with previously published gene profiling data. We then tested and refined the model using additional independent samples with previously published microarray data from another source (that is the test set of 34 samples). Finally, the optimal ratio based test was examined with quantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for data acquisition in a third cohort of samples consisting of 10 frozen normal and 10 tumor prostate tissues. RESULTS: A 3-ratio test using 4 genes was 90% accurate (18 of 20 samples) for distinguishing normal prostate and prostate cancer samples obtained at surgery (Fisher's exact test p = 0.0007). This test did not result in any false-negative findings. CONCLUSIONS: We describe and validate a new gene ratio based test for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, which was developed from the analysis of extensive gene profiling data for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. This test can be easily adapted to the clinical arena without the need for complex computer software or hardware. We anticipate that the gene ratio based diagnosis of prostate cancer using fine needle aspirations could serve as a useful adjunct to standard histopathological techniques.
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Levi A Deters; Matthew D Nitz; Barry C Lieberman; Beow Y Yeap; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; Beow Y Yeap; Edmund S Cibas; William G Richards; Lingsheng Dong; Ritu R Gill; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2014-01-09 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Graham N Rockwell; Paul A Godfrey; Roderick V Jensen; Jonathan N Glickman; Beow Y Yeap; William G Richards; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2005-06-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; Lingsheng Dong; Beow Y Yeap; Roderick V Jensen; William G Richards; Gavin J Gordon; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-11-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; Robert W Cook; Jeff Wilkinson; Corinne E Gustafson; Waqas Amin; Clare E Johnson; Kristen M Oelschlager; Derek J Maetzold; John F Stone; Michael D Feldman; Michael J Becich; Beow Y Yeap; William G Richards; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2016-11-15 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Assunta De Rienzo; William G Richards; Beow Y Yeap; Melissa H Coleman; Peter E Sugarbaker; Lucian R Chirieac; Yaoyu E Wang; John Quackenbush; Roderick V Jensen; Raphael Bueno Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Gavin J Gordon; Lingsheng Dong; Beow Y Yeap; William G Richards; Jonathan N Glickman; Heather Edenfield; Madhubalan Mani; Richard Colquitt; Gautam Maulik; Branden Van Oss; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David Z Qian; Chung-Ying Huang; Catherine A O'Brien; Ilsa M Coleman; Mark Garzotto; Lawrence D True; Celestia S Higano; Robert Vessella; Paul H Lange; Peter S Nelson; Tomasz M Beer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 12.531