Literature DB >> 24412526

Gene expression ratio test distinguishes normal lung from lung tumors in solid tissue and FNA biopsies.

Assunta De Rienzo1, Beow Y Yeap2, Edmund S Cibas3, William G Richards1, Lingsheng Dong4, Ritu R Gill5, David J Sugarbaker1, Raphael Bueno6.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Prognosis and survival are dependent on cell type, early detection, and surgical treatment. Hence, optimal screening strategies and new therapies are urgently required. Although surveillance with low-dose computed tomography can reduce lung cancer mortality by 20%, the number of false-positive detections is significant. Tissue diagnosis aids in the identification of benign nodules, reducing the number of false positive detections. To determine whether molecular testing of fine-needle aspirations (FNAs) can reduce false-positive detections, we developed a gene expression-based test that distinguishes normal from cancerous lung tissues. The test first was applied to published microarray data, showing overall sensitivity and specificity values of 95% (95% CI, 90%-98%) and 100% (95% CI, 40%-100%), respectively. Subsequently, it was validated on 30 solid and ex vivo FNA lung cancer tumor samples and matched normal lung specimens using real-time PCR. The validation test was 93% (95% CI, 78%-99%) sensitive and 100% (95% CI, 88%-100%) specific for the detection of tumor versus normal lung on solid samples, whereas FNA specimens yielded a sensitivity of 91% (95% CI, 72%-99%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI, 70%-100%). This study supports the hypothesis that the gene-ratio approach reliably distinguishes normal lung from cancerous tissues in FNA samples and can be optimized to diagnose benign nodules.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412526      PMCID: PMC3937535          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  34 in total

Review 1.  The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors.

Authors:  Mary Beth Beasley; Elisabeth Brambilla; William D Travis
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 0.800

Review 2.  Microarray analysis and tumor classification.

Authors:  John Quackenbush
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Fine needle aspiration of non-small cell lung cancer: current state and future perspective.

Authors:  A Fassina; R Cappellesso; F Simonato; C Lanza; A Marzari; M Fassan
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  Validation of genomics-based prognostic tests in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Gavin J Gordon; Graham N Rockwell; Paul A Godfrey; Roderick V Jensen; Jonathan N Glickman; Beow Y Yeap; William G Richards; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Lung cancer management in 2010.

Authors:  Apar Kishor Ganti; Chao H Huang; Mark A Klein; Sean Keefe; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  Fine-needle aspiration biopsies for gene expression ratio-based diagnostic and prognostic tests in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Assunta De Rienzo; Lingsheng Dong; Beow Y Yeap; Roderick V Jensen; William G Richards; Gavin J Gordon; David J Sugarbaker; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Classification of human lung carcinomas by mRNA expression profiling reveals distinct adenocarcinoma subclasses.

Authors:  A Bhattacharjee; W G Richards; J Staunton; C Li; S Monti; P Vasa; C Ladd; J Beheshti; R Bueno; M Gillette; M Loda; G Weber; E J Mark; E S Lander; W Wong; B E Johnson; T R Golub; D J Sugarbaker; M Meyerson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  The receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) and the lung.

Authors:  Stephen T Buckley; Carsten Ehrhardt
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2010-01-19

9.  A diagnostic test for prostate cancer from gene expression profiling data.

Authors:  Raphael Bueno; Kevin R Loughlin; Martha H Powell; Gavin J Gordon
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  A gene expression ratio-based diagnostic test for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Lingsheng Dong; Andrew J Bard; William G Richards; Matthew D Nitz; Dan Theodorescu; Raphael Bueno; Gavin J Gordon
Journal:  Adv Appl Bioinform Chem       Date:  2009-01-12
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: predictors and staging.

Authors:  William G Richards
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-06

2.  Validation of a Gene Expression Test for Mesothelioma Prognosis in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues.

Authors:  Assunta De Rienzo; Robert W Cook; Jeff Wilkinson; Corinne E Gustafson; Waqas Amin; Clare E Johnson; Kristen M Oelschlager; Derek J Maetzold; John F Stone; Michael D Feldman; Michael J Becich; Beow Y Yeap; William G Richards; Raphael Bueno
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Robust transcriptional signatures for low-input RNA samples based on relative expression orderings.

Authors:  Huaping Liu; Yawei Li; Jun He; Qingzhou Guan; Rou Chen; Haidan Yan; Weicheng Zheng; Kai Song; Hao Cai; You Guo; Xianlong Wang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  A qualitative signature for early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on relative expression orderings.

Authors:  Lu Ao; Zimei Zhang; Qingzhou Guan; Yating Guo; You Guo; Jiahui Zhang; Xingwei Lv; Haiyan Huang; Huarong Zhang; Xianlong Wang; Zheng Guo
Journal:  Liver Int       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 5.828

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.