Literature DB >> 22116263

Single-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation.

Jin Hwan Ahn1, Yong Seuk Lee, Sang-Hee Choi, Moon Jong Chang, Do Kyung Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine a developed surgical technique by performing a mid-term evaluation of clinical and stability results and complications.
METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent transtibial posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation method were enrolled in this prospective study. Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee scales were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Stability was evaluated using a Telos device with a 150 N force at 90 degrees of knee flexion. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was also performed in 20 (66.7%) patients, and complications were evaluated. Those with complication by MRI were assigned to an abnormal MRI group.
RESULTS: The follow-up period was 47 (range, 25-62) months. On comparing preoperative and final follow-up clinical results, Lysholm and IKDC knee scale scores were found to have improved significantly (P < 0.001). The mean side-to-side difference in posterior translation measured using a Telos device was 13.4 ± 3.1 mm (range 10-20 mm) preoperatively and 3.2 ± 1.5 mm (range 1-7 mm) at last follow-up, which represented a significant improvement in stability (P < 0.001). Five patients showed cyst formation in the tibial tunnel and two patients showed a significant signal increase at the anterior portion of the tibial tunnel, which was believed to indicate a pro-cystic status. The normal and abnormal MRI groups had similar Lysholm and IKDC knee scale scores and stress radiographs (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Single-bundle transtibial PCL reconstruction using a bioabsorbable cross-pin tibial back side fixation was found to produce satisfactory clinical and stability results. However, despite these satisfactory results, a potential complication of tibial cyst formation was observed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22116263     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1769-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  39 in total

1.  Comparative outcome analysis of malpositioned and properly positioned fixation groups after hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction with femoral cross-pin fixation.

Authors:  Yong Seuk Lee; Jeong Ku Ha; Young Jae Kim; Sang Jin Yang; Mi Young Lee; Jin Goo Kim
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Do broken cross-pins compromise stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendons?

Authors:  Nam-Hong Choi; Jung-Hoon Lee; Brian N Victoroff
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Post-tibial cyst formation over 2 years after posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin Hwan Ahn; Yong Seuk Lee; Moon Jong Chang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The effect of femoral tunnel position on graft forces during inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel A Oakes; Keith L Markolf; Justin McWilliams; Charles R Young; David R McAllister
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Yingfang Ao; Jianquan Wang; Jiakuo Yu; Guoqing Cui
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized computed tomography--based study comparing 2 different femoral fixation methods for hamstring graft.

Authors:  Dhananjaya Sabat; Kundan Kundu; Sumit Arora; Vinod Kumar
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Long-term results.

Authors:  A B Lipscomb; A F Anderson; E D Norwig; W D Hovis; D L Brown
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Meniscofemoral ligaments: patterns of tears and pseudotears of the menisci using cadaveric and clinical material.

Authors:  Marcelo R de Abreu; Christine B Chung; Debbra Trudell; Donald Resnick
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung; Suk-Kee Tae; Ho-Joong Jung; Kee-Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  M D Boynton; B R Tietjens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  11 in total

1.  Accessory anterolateral portal in arthroscopic PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Gun Woo Lee; Soo-Jin Jang; Young Choi; Jung-Hwan Son
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanical properties of femoral posterior cruciate ligament fixations.

Authors:  M Ettinger; M Petri; K T Haag; S Brand; A Dratzidis; C Hurschler; C Krettek; M Jagodzinski
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Augmentation or reconstruction of PCL? A quantitative review.

Authors:  Angelo Del Buono; Juri Radmilovic; Giuseppe Gargano; Salvatore Gatto; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Surgical management of PCL injuries: indications, techniques, and outcomes.

Authors:  Scott R Montgomery; Jared S Johnson; David R McAllister; Frank A Petrigliano
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

5.  Posterior cruciate ligament, exploring the unknown.

Authors:  Asbjørn Arøen; Peter Verdonk
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  An isolated rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament results in reduced preoperative knee function in comparison with an anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Asbjørn Arøen; Einar Andreas Sivertsen; Christian Owesen; Lars Engebretsen; Lars Petter Granan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Suspensory Anterior Tibial Fixation in the Anatomic Transtibial Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashraf Elazab; Yong Seuk Lee; Seo Goo Kang
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-01-25

8.  A security evaluation of the Rigid-fix crosses pin system used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in tibial fixation site.

Authors:  Huaqiang Fan; Jian Wang; Yangpan Fu; Huixiang Dong; Jianxiong Wang; Cong Tang; Changming Huang; Zhanjun Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

9.  Comparison of the operation of arthroscopic tibial inlay and traditional tibial inlay for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daifeng Lu; Mochao Xiao; Yongyun Lian; Yong Zhou; Xuefeng Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-10-15

10.  Global variation in isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Derrick M Knapik; Varun Gopinatth; Garrett R Jackson; Jorge Chahla; Matthew V Smith; Matthew J Matava; Robert H Brophy
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.