Literature DB >> 19062829

Factors contributing to comodulation masking release with dichotic maskers.

Emily Buss1, Joseph W Hall.   

Abstract

Detection threshold for a pure tone signal centered in a narrow band of noise may be reduced by inclusion of additional flanking masker bands, provided that they share coherent amplitude modulation (AM) across frequency. This comodulation masking release (CMR) associated with coherent AM across frequency is often much smaller if the signal and on-signal masker are presented to one ear and the flanking masker band(s) are presented contralaterally. An experiment was carried out to explore the role of peripheral effects (e.g., suppression) and central effects (e.g., grouping) in this finding. As frequently reported, CMR was smaller when two or more flanking maskers were presented contralaterally to the signal than when presented ipsilaterally. An intermediate condition, where a subset of flanking maskers was presented to each ear, provided comparable benefit to presenting all flankers ipsilateral to the signal. This result suggests that central effects may play a significant role in the reduced dichotic CMR under some conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19062829      PMCID: PMC2600623          DOI: 10.1121/1.2968685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Within-channel cues in comodulation masking release (CMR): experiments and model predictions using a modulation-filterbank model.

Authors:  J L Verhey; T Dau; B Kollmeier
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Peripheral and central aspects of auditory across-frequency processing.

Authors:  Stephan M A Ernst; Jesko L Verhey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Some factors influencing comodulation masking release and across-channel masking.

Authors:  M L Hicks; S P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Suppression and the upward spread of masking.

Authors:  A J Oxenham; C J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comodulation masking release for various monaural and binaural combinations of the signal, on-frequency, and flanking bands.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Influence of place synchrony on detection of a sinusoid.

Authors:  M F Cohen; E D Schubert
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of gating as a function of number of flanking bands and masker bandwidth.

Authors:  D R Hatch; B C Arné; J W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  6 in total

1.  Spectral profile cues in comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Features of across-frequency envelope coherence critical for comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Effects of masker envelope coherence on intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Monaural envelope correlation perception for bands narrower or wider than a critical band.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural Pitch Fusion: Effects of Amplitude Modulation.

Authors:  Yonghee Oh; Lina A J Reiss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.