Literature DB >> 1939883

Speech-perception aids for hearing-impaired people: current status and needed research. Working Group on Communication Aids for the Hearing-Impaired.

.   

Abstract

Both the overall aging of the population and its exposure to higher noise levels have increased the tendency to hearing loss and the importance of improved hearing aids for speech perception. This article reviews improvements in conventional electroacoustic hearing aids, as well as recently developed alternative classes of speech-perception aids, including surgically implanted cochlear stimulators, and vibrotactile, electrocutaneous and optical stimulating devices. It is concluded that the most effective aid for the vast majority of hearing-impaired persons is, and will remain for the immediate future, the electroacoustic hearing aid. In those cases for which no benefit is demonstrated for the electroacoustic aid, generally meaning persons with profound hearing loss, either the cochlear implant or a tactile aid may provide some improvement in the understanding of speech. In rare cases, some speech understanding in the absence of lip reading is achieved by patients with cochlear implants, for unexplained reasons. This and other pressing questions about speech processing need to be addressed by the research community if more effective aids are to be developed for the use of the 36.5 million hearing-impaired persons expected in the U.S. by the year 2050.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1939883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Electromotile hearing: acoustic tones mask psychophysical response to high-frequency electrical stimulation of intact guinea pig cochleae.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; Kohei Kawamoto; Yehoash Raphael; David F Dolan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural and behavioral changes after the use of hearing aids.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly A Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Perception of environmental sounds by experienced cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Brian Gygi; Min-Yu Cheng; Jay Vachhani; Megan Mulvey
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Electro-Tactile Stimulation Enhances Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition in Noise.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Benjamin Sheffield; Payton Lin; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.