OBJECTIVE: The identification of susceptibility alleles to risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major public health priority. Using apolipoprotein E genotype (APOE), we examined whether neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes, the pathology underlying clinical AD that presumably lies intermediate in the causal chain, would increase power for genetic associations. METHODS: More than 700 older persons underwent annual evaluation and organ donation as part of the Religious Orders Study or Rush Memory and Aging Project. A total of 536 autopsied persons with clinical AD or without dementia with APOE genotyping and a quantitative measure of AD pathology were analyzed. Regression analyses were used to examine the relation of APOE to clinical AD, to the level of cognitive function proximate to death, and to measures of AD neuropathology. RESULTS: APOE epsilon4 was associated with increased odds of clinical AD (p = 3 x 10(-7)), and its association with level of cognition was stronger (p = 8 x 10(-12)). However, the use of quantitative measures of AD pathology markedly enhanced the association (p = 9 x 10(-24)). The APOE epsilon2 was not associated with either AD (p = 0.69) or level of cognition (p = 0.82). However, its association with AD pathology (p = 1 x 10(-5)) was sufficiently strong that it would have warranted follow-up if discovered in a genome-wide association study. Power calculations demonstrate that a sample size of 625 subjects with our measure of AD pathology would be required to meet genome-wide significance of p = 5 x 10(-8) for epsilon2. CONCLUSION: Discovery efforts for susceptibility loci for Alzheimer disease could benefit from the use of neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes as a complement to other approaches.
OBJECTIVE: The identification of susceptibility alleles to risk of Alzheimer disease (AD) is a major public health priority. Using apolipoprotein E genotype (APOE), we examined whether neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes, the pathology underlying clinical AD that presumably lies intermediate in the causal chain, would increase power for genetic associations. METHODS: More than 700 older persons underwent annual evaluation and organ donation as part of the Religious Orders Study or Rush Memory and Aging Project. A total of 536 autopsied persons with clinical AD or without dementia with APOE genotyping and a quantitative measure of AD pathology were analyzed. Regression analyses were used to examine the relation of APOE to clinical AD, to the level of cognitive function proximate to death, and to measures of AD neuropathology. RESULTS:APOE epsilon4 was associated with increased odds of clinical AD (p = 3 x 10(-7)), and its association with level of cognition was stronger (p = 8 x 10(-12)). However, the use of quantitative measures of AD pathology markedly enhanced the association (p = 9 x 10(-24)). The APOE epsilon2 was not associated with either AD (p = 0.69) or level of cognition (p = 0.82). However, its association with AD pathology (p = 1 x 10(-5)) was sufficiently strong that it would have warranted follow-up if discovered in a genome-wide association study. Power calculations demonstrate that a sample size of 625 subjects with our measure of AD pathology would be required to meet genome-wide significance of p = 5 x 10(-8) for epsilon2. CONCLUSION: Discovery efforts for susceptibility loci for Alzheimer disease could benefit from the use of neuropathologic intermediate phenotypes as a complement to other approaches.
Authors: D A Bennett; R S Wilson; J A Schneider; D A Evans; N T Aggarwal; S E Arnold; E J Cochran; E Berry-Kravis; J L Bienias Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Richard J Caselli; Eric M Reiman; Dona E C Locke; Michael L Hutton; Joseph G Hentz; Charlene Hoffman-Snyder; Bryan K Woodruff; Gene E Alexander; David Osborne Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2007-09
Authors: Jason J Corneveaux; Amanda J Myers; April N Allen; Jeremy J Pruzin; Manuel Ramirez; Anzhelika Engel; Michael A Nalls; Kewei Chen; Wendy Lee; Kendria Chewning; Stephen E Villa; Hunsar B Meechoovet; Jill D Gerber; Danielle Frost; Hollie L Benson; Sean O'Reilly; Lori B Chibnik; Joshua M Shulman; Andrew B Singleton; David W Craig; Kendall R Van Keuren-Jensen; Travis Dunckley; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager; Christopher Heward; John Hardy; Eric M Reiman; Matthew J Huentelman Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Lei Yu; Joshua M Shulman; Lori Chibnik; Sue Leurgans; Julie A Schneider; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2011-12-29 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Zoe Arvanitakis; Patricia A Boyle; Leyla de Toledo-Morrell; Julie A Schneider Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2013 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Joshua M Shulman; Kewei Chen; Brendan T Keenan; Lori B Chibnik; Adam Fleisher; Pradeep Thiyyagura; Auttawut Roontiva; Cristin McCabe; Nikolaos A Patsopoulos; Jason J Corneveaux; Lei Yu; Matthew J Huentelman; Denis A Evans; Julie A Schneider; Eric M Reiman; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2013-09-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Richard J Caselli; Dona E C Locke; Amylou C Dueck; David S Knopman; Bryan K Woodruff; Charlene Hoffman-Snyder; Rosa Rademakers; Adam S Fleisher; Eric M Reiman Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Robert J Dawe; David A Bennett; Julie A Schneider; Sue E Leurgans; Aikaterini Kotrotsou; Patricia A Boyle; Konstantinos Arfanakis Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Joshua M Shulman; Lori B Chibnik; Cristin Aubin; Julie A Schneider; David A Bennett; Philip L De Jager Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-06-21 Impact factor: 3.240