Literature DB >> 19396457

Bilateral matching of frequency tuning in neural cross-correlators of the owl.

Brian J Fischer1, José Luis Peña.   

Abstract

Sound localization requires comparison between the inputs to the left and right ears. One important aspect of this comparison is the differences in arrival time to each side, also called interaural time difference (ITD). A prevalent model of ITD detection, consisting of delay lines and coincidence-detector neurons, was proposed by Jeffress (J Comp Physiol Psychol 41:35-39, 1948). As an extension of the Jeffress model, the process of detecting and encoding ITD has been compared to an effective cross-correlation between the input signals to the two ears. Because the cochlea performs a spectrotemporal decomposition of the input signal, this cross-correlation takes place over narrow frequency bands. Since the cochlear tonotopy is arranged in series, sounds of different frequencies will trigger neural activity with different temporal delays. Thus, the matching of the frequency tuning of the left and right inputs to the cross-correlator units becomes a 'timing' issue. These properties of auditory transduction gave theoretical support to an alternative model of ITD-detection based on a bilateral mismatch in frequency tuning, called the 'stereausis' model. Here we first review the current literature on the owl's nucleus laminaris, the equivalent to the medial superior olive of mammals, which is the site where ITD is detected. Subsequently, we use reverse correlation analysis and stimulation with uncorrelated sounds to extract the effective monaural inputs to the cross-correlator neurons. We show that when the left and right inputs to the cross-correlators are defined in this manner, the computation performed by coincidence-detector neurons satisfies conditions of cross-correlation theory. We also show that the spectra of left and right inputs are matched, which is consistent with predictions made by the classic model put forth by Jeffress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396457      PMCID: PMC2719282          DOI: 10.1007/s00422-009-0312-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  37 in total

1.  The superior olivary nucleus and its influence on nucleus laminaris: a source of inhibitory feedback for coincidence detection in the avian auditory brainstem.

Authors:  L Yang; P Monsivais; E W Rubel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Binaural and cochlear disparities.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram Van de Sande; Dries H Louage; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  A matter of time: internal delays in binaural processing.

Authors:  Philip Joris; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 13.837

4.  Passive soma facilitates submillisecond coincidence detection in the owl's auditory system.

Authors:  Go Ashida; Kousuke Abe; Kazuo Funabiki; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Neurons sensitive to interaural phase disparity in gerbil superior olive: diverse monaural and temporal response properties.

Authors:  M W Spitzer; M N Semple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  An auditory illusion predicted from a weighted cross-correlation model of binaural interaction.

Authors:  K Saberi
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Effects of interaural intensity difference on the processing of interaural time difference in the owl's nucleus laminaris.

Authors:  S Viete; J L Peña; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Head-related transfer functions of the barn owl: measurement and neural responses.

Authors:  C H Keller; K Hartung; T T Takahashi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Frequency tuning and spontaneous activity in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus magnocellularis of the barn owl Tyto alba.

Authors:  C Köppl
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of instantaneous frequency glides on interaural time difference processing by auditory coincidence detectors.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Louisa J Steinberg; Bertrand Fontaine; Romain Brette; Jose L Peña
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Coupled ears in lizards and crocodilians.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Hilary Bierman
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  A functional circuit model of interaural time difference processing.

Authors:  Thomas McColgan; Sahil Shah; Christine Köppl; Catherine Carr; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Authors:  Catherine E Carr; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 1.808

5.  Neural development of binaural tuning through Hebbian learning predicts frequency-dependent best delays.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Romain Brette
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Kenneth K Jensen; Stefano Cosentino; Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Ergodicity and parameter estimates in auditory neural circuits.

Authors:  Peter G Toth; Petr Marsalek; Ondrej Pokora
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Neural tuning matches frequency-dependent time differences between the ears.

Authors:  Victor Benichoux; Bertrand Fontaine; Tom P Franken; Shotaro Karino; Philip X Joris; Romain Brette
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 8.140

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.