Literature DB >> 19396006

A clinical and biological comparison between malignant mixed müllerian tumors and grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas.

Amy E Bland1, Rebecca Stone, Cara Heuser, Jianfen Shu, Amir Jazaeri, Jamie Shutter, Kristin Atkins, Laurel Rice.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the clinicopathologic features, progression-free interval, and survival of patients with grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer (G3 EEC) and malignant mixed müllerian tumors (MMMTs). Akt, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and HER-2/neu expression in these histologic subtypes was also investigated. Associations between phosphorylated Akt and clinicopathologic features were tested.
METHODS: One hundred nineteen women whose conditions were diagnosed with MMMT or G3 EEC from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2003, met inclusion criteria. Retrospective data review was performed. In addition, Akt and EGFR protein expression was measured in tissue samples using Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was used to assay HER-2/neu gene amplification.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients with MMMT and 60 patients with G3 EEC were identified. Patients with MMMT were older (P = 0.055), more likely to be African American (P = 0.049), have a family history of breast cancer (P = 0.039), have disease involving the uterine cervix (P = 0.007), and experience postoperative complications (P = 0.012). Patients with MMMT had a significantly shorter progression-free interval (23 vs 57 months, P = 0.001) and survival (55 vs 92 months, P = 0.001) than patients with G3 EEC.Grade 3 EEC and MMMT have significantly higher phospho-Akt levels than grade 1 EEC and normal controls. Phospho-Akt was associated with depth of myometrial invasion (r = 0.46, P = 0.05), but not with stage, lymph-vascular space invasion, or tumor size. The mesenchymal component of MMMT preferentially demonstrated EGFR expression relative to the epithelial component (45% vs 13%, P = 0.06). HER-2/neu amplification was observed in 1 of 37 samples.
CONCLUSIONS: Improved therapy is warranted for both poorly differentiated EEC and MMMT. Recognition of similarities and differences between MMMT and other high-grade histologic types of uterine cancer may provide rationale for new treatment approaches possibly incorporating targeted biological therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19396006     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e31819a1fa5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  11 in total

1.  Molecular and clinicopathological analyses of esophageal carcinosarcoma with special reference to morphological change.

Authors:  Sho Tsuyama; Tsuyoshi Saito; Yoichi Akazawa; Yuka Yanai; Noboru Yatagai; Keisuke Akaike; Takuo Hayashi; Yoshiyuki Suehara; Fumiyuki Takahashi; Kazuya Takamochi; Takashi Hashimoto; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Masahiko Tsurumaru; Tetsu Fukunaga; Takashi Yao
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Which is worse: uterine papillary serous carcinomas or carcinosarcomas?

Authors:  Taejong Song; Chel Hun Choi; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 4.401

3.  Comparison of survival outcomes between patients with malignant mixed mullerian tumors and high-grade endometrioid, clear cell, and papillary serous endometrial cancers.

Authors:  Ashley Sinclair Felix; Roslyn A Stone; Robert Bowser; Mamatha Chivukula; Robert P Edwards; Joel L Weissfeld; Faina Linkov
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Integrated Molecular Characterization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Andrew D Cherniack; Hui Shen; Vonn Walter; Chip Stewart; Bradley A Murray; Reanne Bowlby; Xin Hu; Shiyun Ling; Robert A Soslow; Russell R Broaddus; Rosemary E Zuna; Gordon Robertson; Peter W Laird; Raju Kucherlapati; Gordon B Mills; John N Weinstein; Jiashan Zhang; Rehan Akbani; Douglas A Levine
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Endometrial Carcinoma Mortality and Recurrence.

Authors:  Theodore M Brasky; Ashley S Felix; David E Cohn; D Scott McMeekin; David G Mutch; William T Creasman; Premal H Thaker; Joan L Walker; Richard G Moore; Shashikant B Lele; Saketh R Guntupalli; Levi S Downs; Christa I Nagel; John F Boggess; Michael L Pearl; Olga B Ioffe; Kay J Park; Shamshad Ali; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Molecular classification and subtype-specific drug sensitivity research of uterine carcinosarcoma under multi-omics framework.

Authors:  Xiaofan Lu; Liya Zhang; Huiling Zhao; Chen Chen; Yaoyan Wang; Shengjie Liu; Xiao Lin; Yue Wang; Qianyuan Zhang; Tao Lu; Fangrong Yan
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.742

7.  DNA Mismatch Repair-deficient Endometrial Carcinosarcomas Portend Distinct Clinical, Morphologic, and Molecular Features Compared With Traditional Carcinosarcomas.

Authors:  Sheila E Segura; Silvana Pedra Nobre; Yaser R Hussein; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Britta Weigelt; Robert A Soslow; Deborah F DeLair
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis on preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with uterine carcinosarcoma.

Authors:  Jeong-Won Lee; Eun Jin Heo; Seung Hwan Moon; Hyunjong Lee; Gi Jeong Cheon; Maria Lee; Hee Seung Kim; Hyun Hoon Chung
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Uterine carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed müllerian tumours): a review with special emphasis on the controversies in management.

Authors:  Rani Kanthan; Jenna-Lynn Senger
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2011-10-05

10.  Clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma and grade 3 endometrial cancer patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  Jun Zhu; Hao Wen; Rui Bi; Xiaohua Wu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.