Literature DB >> 19394752

Detectability of small blood vessels with high-frequency power Doppler and selection of wall filter cut-off velocity for microvascular imaging.

Stephen Z Pinter1, James C Lacefield.   

Abstract

Power Doppler imaging of physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis is widely used in preclinical studies to track normal development, disease progression and treatment efficacy but can be challenging given the presence of small blood vessels and slow flow velocities. Power Doppler images can be plagued with false-positive color pixels or undetected vessels, thereby complicating the interpretation of vascularity metrics such as color pixel density (CPD). As an initial step toward improved microvascular quantification, flow-phantom experiments were performed to establish relationships between vessel detection and various combinations of vessel size (160, 200, 250, 300 and 360 microm), flow velocity (4, 3, 2, 1 and 0.5 mm/s) and transducer frequency (30 and 40 MHz) while varying the wall filter cut-off velocity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and areas under ROC curves indicate that good vessel detection performance can be achieved with a 40-MHz transducer for flow velocities > or =2 mm/s and with a 30-MHz transducer for flow velocities > or =1 mm/s. In the second part of the analysis, CPD was plotted as a function of wall filter cut-off velocity for each flow-phantom data set. Three distinct regions were observed: overestimation of CPD at low cut-offs, underestimation of CPD at high cut-offs and a plateau at intermediate cut-offs. The CPD at the plateau closely matched the phantom's vascular volume fraction and the length of the plateau corresponded with the flow-detection performance of the Doppler system assessed using ROC analysis. Color pixel density vs. wall filter cut-off curves from analogous in vivo experiments exhibited the same shape, including a distinct CPD plateau. The similar shape of the flow-phantom and in vivo curves suggests that the presence of a plateau in vivo can be used to identify the best-estimate CPD value that can be treated as a quantitative vascularity metric. The ability to identify the best CPD estimate is expected to improve quantification of angiogenesis and anti-vascular treatment responses with power Doppler.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394752     DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2009.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  9 in total

Review 1.  Photoacoustic Imaging in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Binita Shrestha; Frank DeLuna; Mark A Anastasio; Jing Yong Ye; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Oncologic Angiogenesis Imaging in the clinic---how and why.

Authors:  Karen A Kurdziel; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2011-09

3.  A perspective on vascular disrupting agents that interact with tubulin: preclinical tumor imaging and biological assessment.

Authors:  Ralph P Mason; Dawen Zhao; Li Liu; Mary Lynn Trawick; Kevin G Pinney
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Experimental Validation of ARFI Surveillance of Subcutaneous Hemorrhage (ASSH) Using Calibrated Infusions in a Tissue-Mimicking Model and Dogs.

Authors:  Rebecca E Geist; Chase H DuBois; Timothy C Nichols; Melissa C Caughey; Elizabeth P Merricks; Robin Raymer; Caterina M Gallippi
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Comparison of optical and power Doppler ultrasound imaging for non-invasive evaluation of arsenic trioxide as a vascular disrupting agent in tumors.

Authors:  Mustafa K Alhasan; Li Liu; Matthew A Lewis; Jennifer Magnusson; Ralph P Mason
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Wall-less flow phantom for high-frequency ultrasound applications.

Authors:  David A Kenwright; Nicola Laverick; Tom Anderson; Carmel M Moran; Peter R Hoskins
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Microbubble-based enhancement of radiation effect: Role of cell membrane ceramide metabolism.

Authors:  Azza Al-Mahrouki; Anoja Giles; Amr Hashim; Hyunjung Christina Kim; Ahmad El-Falou; Dean Rowe-Magnus; Golnaz Farhat; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Tumour Vascular Shutdown and Cell Death Following Ultrasound-Microbubble Enhanced Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Ahmed El Kaffas; Mehrdad J Gangeh; Golnaz Farhat; William Tyler Tran; Amr Hashim; Anoja Giles; Gregory J Czarnota
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 11.556

9.  Very different performance of the power Doppler modalities of several ultrasound machines ascertained by a microvessel flow phantom.

Authors:  David F Ten Cate; Jolanda J Luime; Myrthe van der Ven; Johanna M W Hazes; Klazina Kooiman; Nico de Jong; Johannes G Bosch
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 5.156

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.