Literature DB >> 21795753

Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning.

Jelena Djordjevic1, Arshed M Toma, Alexei I Zhurov, Stephen Richmond.   

Abstract

Laser scanning is a non-invasive method for three-dimensional assessment of facial morphology and symmetry. The aim of this study was to quantify facial symmetry in healthy adolescents and explore if there is any gender difference. Facial scans of 270 subjects, 123 males and 147 females (aged 15.3 ± 0.1 years, range 14.6-15.6), were randomly selected from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Facial scans were processed and analysed using in-house developed subroutines for commercial software. The surface matching between the original face and its mirror image was measured for the whole face, upper, middle, and lower facial thirds. In addition, 3 angular and 14 linear parameters were measured. The percentage of symmetry of the whole face was significantly lower in males (53.49 ± 10.73 per cent) than in females (58.50 ± 10.27 per cent; P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in the amount of symmetry among facial thirds within each gender (P > 0.05). Average values of linear parameters were less than 1 mm and did not differ significantly between genders (P > 0.05). One angular parameter showed slight lip line asymmetry in both genders. Faces of male 15-year-old adolescents were less symmetric than those of females, but the difference in the amount of symmetry, albeit statistically significant, may not be clinically relevant. Upper, middle, and lower thirds of the face did not differ in the amount of three-dimensional symmetry. Angular and linear parameters of facial symmetry did not show any gender difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21795753      PMCID: PMC3969526          DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  48 in total

1.  Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system.

Authors:  Chung How Kau; Stephen Richmond; Alexei I Zhurov; Jeremy Knox; Ivor Chestnutt; Frank Hartles; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis.

Authors:  Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Il-Sun Youn; Ki-Heon Lee; Hoi-Jeong Lim
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Early crossbite correction: a three-dimensional evaluation.

Authors:  Jasmina Primozic; Maja Ovsenik; Stephen Richmond; Chung How Kau; Alexei Zhurov
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Three-dimensional longitudinal assessment of facial symmetry in adolescents.

Authors:  Jelena Djordjevic; Pertti Pirttiniemi; Virpi Harila; Tuomo Heikkinen; Arshed M Toma; Alexei I Zhurov; Stephen Richmond
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Mandibular asymmetry in healthy children.

Authors:  Maija Liukkonen; Lauri Sillanmäki; Timo Peltomäki
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina.

Authors:  T R Severt; W R Proffit
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1997

7.  Impact of facial asymmetry in visual perception: a 3-dimensional data analysis.

Authors:  Philipp Meyer-Marcotty; Georg W Alpers; Antje B M Gerdes; Angelika Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)--study design and collaborative opportunities.

Authors:  Jean Golding
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.664

9.  Craniofacial asymmetry in development: an anatomical study.

Authors:  Marcelle Rossi; Eduardo Ribeiro; Ricardo Smith
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Asymmetry of the face in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Seiji Haraguchi; Yoshitaka Iguchi; Kenji Takada
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.079

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Reverse Engineering in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Hajra Ghafoor
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2018-12-01

2.  Effects of Objective 3-Dimensional Measures of Facial Shape and Symmetry on Perceptions of Facial Attractiveness.

Authors:  Cory D Hatch; George L Wehby; Nichole L Nidey; Lina M Moreno Uribe
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Quantitative analysis of facial symmetry by using three-dimensional technology.

Authors:  Zhouqiang Wu; Xiaolei Gao; Hu Long; Wenli Lai
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Face symmetry assessment abilities: Clinical implications for diagnosing asymmetry.

Authors:  Tate H Jackson; Stephen R Mitroff; Kait Clark; William R Proffit; Jessica Y Lee; Tung T Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Evaluation of facial asymmetry by stereophotogrammetry in individuals with unilateral maxillary impacted canine.

Authors:  Ahmet Oğuz Şahan; Burçin Akan
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 6.  Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J Maal; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Methods to quantify soft tissue-based cranial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos M Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Jan G Schols; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comparison Between Interactive Closest Point and Procrustes Analysis for Determining the Median Sagittal Plane of Three-Dimensional Facial Data.

Authors:  Yuxue Xiong; Yijiao Zhao; Huifang Yang; Yucun Sun; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 9.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: A systematic review.

Authors:  Gopi Akhil; Kullampalayam Palanisamy Senthil Kumar; Subramani Raja; Kumaresan Janardhanan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2015-08

10.  Three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry in association with unilateral functional crossbite in the primary, early, and late mixed dentition phases.

Authors:  Jasmina Primozic; Giuseppe Perinetti; Stephen Richmond; Maja Ovsenik
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.