Literature DB >> 19394159

Integration of real-time internal electromagnetic position monitoring coupled with dynamic multileaf collimator tracking: an intensity-modulated radiation therapy feasibility study.

Ryan L Smith1, Amit Sawant, Lakshmi Santanam, Raghu B Venkat, Laurence J Newell, Byung-Chul Cho, Per Poulsen, Herbert Catell, Paul J Keall, Parag J Parikh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continuous tumor position measurement coupled with a tumor tracking system would result in a highly accurate radiation therapy system. Previous internal position monitoring systems have been limited by fluoroscopic radiation dose and low delivery efficiency. We aimed to incorporate a continuous, electromagnetic, three-dimensional position tracking system (Calypso 4D Localization System) with a dynamic multileaf collimator (DMLC)-based dose delivery system. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A research version of the Calypso System provided real-time position of three Beacon transponders. These real-time three-dimensional positions were sent to research MLC controller with a motion-tracking algorithm that changed the planned leaf sequence. Electromagnetic transponders were embedded in a solid water film phantom that moved with patient lung trajectories while being irradiated with two different plans: a step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy (S-IMRT) field and a dynamic IMRT (D-IMRT) field. Dosimetric results were recorded under three conditions: no intervention, DMLC tracking, and a spatial gating system.
RESULTS: Dosimetric accuracy was comparable for gating and DMLC tracking. Failure rates for gating/DMLC tracking are as follows: +/-3 cGy 10.9/ 7.5% for S-IMRT, 3.3/7.2% for D-IMRT; gamma (3mm/3%) 0.2/1.2% for S-IMRT, 0.2/0.2% for D-IMRT. DMLC tracking proved to be as efficient as standard delivery, with a two- to fivefold efficiency increase over gating.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time target position information was successfully integrated into a DMLC effector system to modify dose delivery. Experimental results show both comparable dosimetric accuracy as well as improved efficiency compared with spatial gating.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19394159     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  11 in total

1.  The dosimetric impact of inversely optimized arc radiotherapy plan modulation for real-time dynamic MLC tracking delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Larsson; Paul Keall; Byung Chul Cho; Marianne Aznar; Stine Korreman; Per Poulsen; Per Munck Af Rosenschold
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Detailed analysis of latencies in image-based dynamic MLC tracking.

Authors:  Per Rugaard Poulsen; Byungchul Cho; Amit Sawant; Dan Ruan; Paul J Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Failure mode and effect analysis-based quality assurance for dynamic MLC tracking systems.

Authors:  Amit Sawant; Sonja Dieterich; Michelle Svatos; Paul Keall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The first clinical implementation of electromagnetic transponder-guided MLC tracking.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Emma Colvill; Ricky O'Brien; Jin Aun Ng; Per Rugaard Poulsen; Thomas Eade; Andrew Kneebone; Jeremy T Booth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Electromagnetic-guided dynamic multileaf collimator tracking enables motion management for intensity-modulated arc therapy.

Authors:  Paul J Keall; Amit Sawant; Byungchul Cho; Dan Ruan; Junqing Wu; Per Poulsen; Jay Petersen; Laurence J Newell; Herbert Cattell; Stine Korreman
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  The correlation of tissue motion within the lung: implications on fiducial based treatments.

Authors:  Ryan L Smith; Deshan Yang; Andrew Lee; Martin L Mayse; Dan A Low; Parag J Parikh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A method to reconstruct intra-fractional liver motion in rotational radiotherapy using linear fiducial markers.

Authors:  Yujie Chi; Chenyang Shen; Bin Li; You Zhang; Ming Yang; Michael Folkert; Xun Jia
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Adaptive radiation for lung cancer.

Authors:  Daniel R Gomez; Joe Y Chang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.375

9.  Motion management during IMAT treatment of mobile lung tumors--a comparison of MLC tracking and gated delivery.

Authors:  Marianne Falk; Tobias Pommer; Paul Keall; Stine Korreman; Gitte Persson; Per Poulsen; Per Munck af Rosenschöld
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Abdominal and pancreatic motion correlation using 4D CT, 4D transponders, and a gating belt.

Authors:  Ricardo Betancourt; Wei Zou; John P Plastaras; James M Metz; Boon-Keng Teo; Alireza Kassaee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.