Literature DB >> 19393889

Visual function after implantation of an aspheric bifocal intraocular lens.

José F Alfonso1, Luis Fernández-Vega, Hussein Amhaz, Robert Montés-Micó, Beatriz Valcárcel, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate distance, intermediate, and near vision after bifocal aspheric AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD1 intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
SETTING: Fernández-Vega Ophthalmological Institute, Oviedo, Spain.
METHODS: Binocular distance best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) (4.0 m), best distance-corrected near (40.0 cm) and intermediate (70.0, 60.0, 50.0 cm) acuities, and contrast sensitivity under photopic (85.0 candelas [cd]/m(2)) and mesopic (3.0 cd/m(2)) conditions with and without glare were measured postoperatively. A patient-satisfaction and visual phenomena questionnaire was administered.
RESULTS: Six months postoperatively, the mean acuities (logMAR) were binocular BCVA, -0.064 +/- 0.049 (SD); best corrected near, -0.041 +/- 0.061; best corrected intermediate, 0.147 +/- 0.130 (70.0 cm), 0.036 +/- 0.133 (60.0 cm), and -0.126 +/- 0.077 (50.0 cm). The BCVA and best corrected near acuity were 20/25 or better in all patients. Through-focus binocular logMAR acuities had 2 peaks at the expected far focus and near focus (0.00 diopter [D] and -2.40 D, respectively), with somewhat reduced acuity (20/32) at intermediate distances. Photopic contrast sensitivity was within the standard normal range. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was lower than under photopic conditions, particularly at higher spatial frequencies. Patients reported good performance for distance, near, and intermediate visual tasks with no or minimal difficulty with specific tasks. No patient reported severe visual phenomena; halos and glare were rated as none to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: The aspheric IOL provided good functional vision at far and near, with lower performance at intermediate distance; good photopic contrast sensitivity and lower mesopic performance; and a low incidence of visual disturbances.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393889     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  14 in total

1.  In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony.

Authors:  Alberto Domínguez-Vicent; Jose Juan Esteve-Taboada; Antonio J Del Águila-Carrasco; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.

Authors:  Anna Voskresenskaya; Nadezhda Pozdeyeva; Nicolay Pashtaev; Yevgeniy Batkov; Valeriy Treushnicov; Valentin Cherednik
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

4.  Pupil size differences between female and male patients after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Enrique Ordiñaga-Monreal; Diego Castanera-Gratacós; Fernando Castanera; Isabel Fambuena-Muedra; Fidel Vega; María S Millán
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2021-02-03

5.  Comparison of visual outcomes and subjective visual quality after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens and blended implantation of apodized diffractive bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-10

6.  Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs.

Authors:  Kjell G Gundersen; Rick Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-08

7.  Comparison of visual outcomes, spectacles dependence and patient satisfaction of multifocal and accommodative intraocular lenses: innovative perspectives for maximal refractive-oriented cataract surgery.

Authors:  Raffaele Nuzzi; Federico Tridico
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.209

8.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes after Mix and Match Implantation of Two Multifocal Intraocular Lenses with Different Adds.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Jiang; Shaochong Bu; Fang Tian; Jingli Liang; Tiecheng Wang; Xiuli Xing; Hong Zhang; Xiaomin Zhang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Medium-term visual outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens with +3.00 d addition power.

Authors:  Xiaohong Guo; Yi Sun; Bowen Zhang; Danying Zheng
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Rotational stability and visual performance 3 months after bilateral implantation of a new toric extended range of vision intraocular lens.

Authors:  Kjell Gunnar Gundersen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.