Literature DB >> 19393881

Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratomes for flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis and effect of postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness.

Andreia Martins Rosa1, Joaquim Neto Murta, Maria João Quadrado, Cristina Tavares, Conceição Lobo, Robert Van Velze, António Castanheira-Dinis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flaps created with a femtosecond laser or a mechanical microkeratome and analyze the effect of the postoperative measurement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thickness using ultrasound (US) pachymetry.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Coimbra, and Coimbra Surgical Centre, Coimbra, Portugal.
METHODS: Flaps were created with a Hansatome Zero Compression microkeratome (Group 1), Zyoptix XP keratome (Group 2), or IntraLase 60 kHz femtosecond laser (Groups 3 and 4). Flap thickness was determined by intraoperative US pachymetry immediately after flap creation in Groups 1, 2, and 3. In Group 4, pachymetry was performed 20 minutes after the laser treatment. The main outcome measures were flap thickness and deviation from the target value.
RESULTS: Eighty patients had LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism. The mean flap thickness was 149.1 microm +/- 24.9 (SD) in Group 1, 124.7 +/- 23.8 microm in Group 2, 143.1 +/- 18.4 microm in Group 3, and 115.5 +/- 12.5 microm in Group 4. The difference in flap thickness between Group 3 and Group 4 was statistically significant (P<.01). The flap thickness deviation from the target value was 22.8 microm in Group 1, 19.0 microm in Group 2, 26.1 microm in Group 3, and 10.4 microm in Group 4.
CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that the time of measurement after femtosecond affects the estimated flap thickness. Waiting 20 minutes after laser treatment permitted easier separation and may eliminate the effect of variable corneal dehydration on flap measurement by subtraction pachymetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393881     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  Noninvasive intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) of the cornea with blue femtosecond laser light.

Authors:  Lisen Xu; Wayne H Knox; Margaret DeMagistris; Nadan Wang; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  [Scanning electron microscopic investigations of cutting edge quality in lamellar keratotomy using the Wavelight femtosecond laser (FS-200) : What influence do spot distance and an additional tunnel have?]

Authors:  T Hammer; T Höche; J Heichel
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Corneal flap assessment with Rondo microkeratome in laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Eleftherios I Paschalis; Antonis P Aristeidou; Nikitas C Foudoulakis; Lambros A Razis
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

5.  Repeatability of laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness measurement by Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Camila Haydée Rosas Salaroli; Yan Li; Xinbo Zhang; Maolong Tang; José Luiz Branco Ramos; Norma Allemann; David Huang
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Corneal stromal dehydration and optimal stromal exposure time during corneal refractive surgery measured using a three-dimensional optical profiler.

Authors:  Yanan Wu; Yan Wang; Zimiao Zhang; Xingchen Yu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Myopic LASIK Outcomes: Comparison of Three Different Femtosecond Lasers and a Mechanical Microkeratome Using the Same Excimer Laser.

Authors:  Juan Gros-Otero; Isabel Rodríguez-Pérez; Miguel A Teus; Andreas Katsanos; Dimitrios G Mikropoulos; Montserrat García-González
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-03-09

8.  Comparison of DLK incidence after laser in situ keratomileusis associated with two femtosecond lasers: Femto LDV and IntraLase FS60.

Authors:  Minoru Tomita; Yuko Sotoyama; Satoshi Yukawa; Tadayuki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-08

Review 9.  The evolution of corneal and refractive surgery with the femtosecond laser.

Authors:  Antonis Aristeidou; Elise V Taniguchi; Michael Tsatsos; Rodrigo Muller; Colm McAlinden; Roberto Pineda; Eleftherios I Paschalis
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-14

10.  Femtosecond laser versus mechanical microkeratome-assisted flap creation for LASIK: a prospective, randomized, paired-eye study.

Authors:  Bojan Pajic; Iraklis Vastardis; Brigitte Pajic-Eggspuehler; Zisis Gatzioufas; Farhad Hafezi
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.