Literature DB >> 19393787

Short-term effects of a teenage driver cell phone restriction.

Robert D Foss1, Arthur H Goodwin, Anne T McCartt, Laurie A Hellinga.   

Abstract

On December 1, 2006, North Carolina began prohibiting use of any mobile communication device by drivers younger than 18. The current study examined the effects of the law on teenage drivers' cell phone use. Teenage drivers were observed at high schools in North Carolina 1-2 months before and approximately 5 months after the law took effect. The proportion of teenagers using cell phones did not change significantly (11.0% before the law took effect, 11.8% after). Cell phone use among teenage drivers at high schools in South Carolina, an adjacent state without a teenage driver phone ban, was stable at about 13%. Interviews were conducted with parents and teenagers in North Carolina both before and after the law took effect. In post-law interviews, teenagers were more likely than parents to say they knew about the cell phone restriction (64% vs. 39%), but support for the ban was greater among parents (95% vs. 74%). Only 22% of teenagers and 13% of parents believed the law was being enforced fairly often or a lot. Although the proportion of teenagers who reported using phones while driving declined somewhat following the law, about half admitted they used their phones, if they had driven, on the day prior to the interview. Overall, the findings suggest that North Carolina's cell phone restriction had little to no effect on teenage drivers' use of cell phones shortly after the law took effect.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19393787     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  17 in total

Review 1.  Graduated Driver Licensing: An international review.

Authors:  Lyndel J Bates; Siobhan Allen; Kerry Armstrong; Barry Watson; Mark J King; Jeremy Davey
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2014-10-14

2.  Keeping an eye on distracted driving.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Coben; Motao Zhu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Driver cellphone and texting bans in the United States: evidence of effectiveness.

Authors:  Anne T McCartt; David G Kidd; Eric R Teoh
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2014

4.  Special considerations in distracted driving with teens.

Authors:  Dennis R Durbin; Daniel V McGehee; Donald Fisher; Anne McCartt
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2014

5.  Compliance With and Enforcement of Graduated Driver Licensing Restrictions.

Authors:  Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Michael R Elliott
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  The association between handheld phone bans and the prevalence of handheld phone conversations among young drivers in the United States.

Authors:  Motao Zhu; Toni M Rudisill; Steven Heeringa; David Swedler; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  The association between states' texting regulations and the prevalence of texting while driving among U.S. high school students.

Authors:  Toni M Rudisill; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Estimating young novice drivers' compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions: A novel approach.

Authors:  Allison E Curry
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.491

9.  Challenges of enforcing cell phone use while driving laws among police: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Toni Marie Rudisill; Adam D Baus; Traci Jarrett
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 10.  Adolescents and the internet: what mental health clinicians need to know.

Authors:  Malak Rafla; Nicholas J Carson; Sandra M DeJong
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 5.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.