Literature DB >> 27746012

Compliance With and Enforcement of Graduated Driver Licensing Restrictions.

Allison E Curry1, Melissa R Pfeiffer2, Michael R Elliott3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) is the most effective strategy to reduce the burden of young driver crashes, but the extent to which young intermediate (newly licensed) drivers comply with, and police enforce, important GDL passenger and night-time restrictions is largely unknown. Population-level rates of intermediate drivers' compliance were estimated as well as police enforcement among crash-involved drivers who were noncompliant.
METHODS: New Jersey's statewide driver licensing and crash databases were individually linked. The quasi-induced exposure method's fundamental assumption-that nonresponsible young intermediate drivers in clean (i.e., only one responsible driver) multivehicle crashes are reasonably representative of young intermediate drivers on the road-was borrowed. Incidence was then estimated among the 9,250 nonresponsible intermediate drivers who were involved in clean multivehicle crashes from July 2010 through June 2012. The proportion of crash-involved noncompliant intermediate drivers who were issued a GDL citation, by crash responsibility, was calculated. Data were collected in 2013 and analyzed in 2015.
RESULTS: Overall, 8.3% (95% CI=7.8%, 8.9%) of intermediate drivers' trips were noncompliant with New Jersey's passenger restriction and 3.1% (95% CI=2.8%, 3.5%) with its night-time restriction; compliance was significantly lower among those residing in low-income and urban areas, among male drivers, on weekends, and in summer months. The proportion of crash-involved noncompliant intermediate drivers who were issued a GDL citation was low (nonresponsible drivers, 10.3%; responsible drivers, 19.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: The vast majority of intermediate driver trips are in compliance with GDL restrictions. Outreach activities should consider focusing on higher-risk situations and groups with higher noncompliance rates.
Copyright © 2016 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27746012      PMCID: PMC5167653          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  29 in total

1.  A review of the validity of the underlying assumptions of quasi-induced exposure.

Authors:  Xinguo Jiang; Richard W Lyles
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2010-03-21

2.  Graduated licensing laws and fatal crashes of teenage drivers: a national study.

Authors:  Anne T McCartt; Eric R Teoh; Michele Fields; Keli A Braitman; Laurie A Hellinga
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.491

Review 3.  A conceptual framework for reducing risky teen driving behaviors among minority youth.

Authors:  P Juarez; D G Schlundt; I Goldzweig; N Stinson
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Do states upgrading to primary enforcement of safety belt laws experience increased daytime and nighttime belt use?

Authors:  Scott Vincent Masten
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2007-03-22

5.  Long-term changes in crash rates after introduction of a Graduated Driver Licensing decal provision.

Authors:  Allison E Curry; Michael R Elliott; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Konny H Kim; Dennis R Durbin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Graduated driver licensing decal law: effect on young probationary drivers.

Authors:  Allison E Curry; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Russell Localio; Dennis R Durbin
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 7.  Cell phones and driving: review of research.

Authors:  Anne T McCartt; Laurie A Hellinga; Keli A Bratiman
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.491

8.  Novice drivers' exposure to known risk factors during the first 18 months of licensure: the effect of vehicle ownership.

Authors:  Sheila G Klauer; Bruce Simons-Morton; Suzanne E Lee; Marie Claude Ouimet; E Henry Howard; Thomas A Dingus
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.491

9.  Kentucky's graduated driver licensing program for young drivers: barriers to effective local implementation.

Authors:  L C Steenbergen; P S Kidd; S Pollack; C McCoy; J G Pigman; K R Agent
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 10.  Parenting and the young driver problem.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Marie Claude Ouimet; Richard F Catalano
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  7 in total

1.  Vehicle safety characteristics in vulnerable driver populations.

Authors:  Kristina B Metzger; Emma Sartin; Robert D Foss; Nina Joyce; Allison E Curry
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 1.491

2.  Young Driver Compliance With Graduated Driver Licensing Restrictions Before and After Implementation of a Decal Provision.

Authors:  Aimee J Palumbo; Melissa R Pfeiffer; Michael R Elliott; Allison E Curry
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 5.012

3.  Adolescents' perspectives on distracted driving legislation.

Authors:  Caitlin N Pope; Jessica H Mirman; Despina Stavrinos
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2018-12-23

4.  The prevalence and excess mortality risk of driving with children.

Authors:  Richard A Dunn; Nathan W Tefft; Eduardo Romano
Journal:  J Safety Res       Date:  2022-05-28

5.  Estimating young novice drivers' compliance with graduated driver licensing restrictions: A novel approach.

Authors:  Allison E Curry
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 1.491

6.  Pathways linking car transport for young adults and the public health in Northern Ireland: a qualitative study to inform the evaluation of graduated driver licensing.

Authors:  Nicola Christie; Rebecca Steinbach; Judith Green; M Patricia Mullan; Lindsay Prior
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Validating the representativeness assumption of the quasi-induced exposure method using a national representative field observation survey.

Authors:  Sijun Shen; Shan Bao; Motao Zhu
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.491

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.