PURPOSE: This study examined the psychosocial adjustment and needs of family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors at 6-24 months posttreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors (N=89) completed mailed questionnaires that assessed demographic variables, mental health, quality of life, and practical and informational needs. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of caregivers reported moderate to high distress. However, quality of life scores for the entire sample (N=89) were better than the scores reported in initial validation studies on caregivers of patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Greater time spent caregiving was associated with worse psychological well-being, but also more positive adaptation to caregiving. In addition, 39% of caregivers reported that all of their practical and informational needs were being met. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that research and clinical efforts are needed to address the psychosocial concerns of this population.
PURPOSE: This study examined the psychosocial adjustment and needs of family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors at 6-24 months posttreatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Family caregivers of head and neck cancer survivors (N=89) completed mailed questionnaires that assessed demographic variables, mental health, quality of life, and practical and informational needs. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of caregivers reported moderate to high distress. However, quality of life scores for the entire sample (N=89) were better than the scores reported in initial validation studies on caregivers of patients undergoing active cancer treatment. Greater time spent caregiving was associated with worse psychological well-being, but also more positive adaptation to caregiving. In addition, 39% of caregivers reported that all of their practical and informational needs were being met. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that research and clinical efforts are needed to address the psychosocial concerns of this population.
Authors: Eva Grunfeld; Doug Coyle; Timothy Whelan; Jennifer Clinch; Leonard Reyno; Craig C Earle; Andrew Willan; Raymond Viola; Marjorie Coristine; Teresa Janz; Robert Glossop Journal: CMAJ Date: 2004-06-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: B E Compas; N L Worsham; J E Epping-Jordan; K E Grant; G Mireault; D C Howell; V L Malcarne Journal: Health Psychol Date: 1994-11 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Paul Hanly; Rebecca Maguire; Myles Balfe; Philip Hyland; Aileen Timmons; Eleanor O'Sullivan; Phyllis Butow; Linda Sharp Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-05-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Margaret L Longacre; John A Ridge; Barbara A Burtness; Thomas J Galloway; Carolyn Y Fang Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Donna M Posluszny; Angela Liegey Dougall; Jonas T Johnson; Athanassios Argiris; Robert L Ferris; Andrew Baum; Dana H Bovbjerg; Mary Amanda Dew Journal: Head Neck Date: 2014-09-17 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Chandylen L Nightingale; Deidre B Pereira; Barbara A Curbow; John R Wingard; Giselle D Carnaby Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.522