Literature DB >> 19390172

Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.

Thomas Lenarz1, Timo Stöver, Andreas Buechner, Anke Lesinski-Schiedat, Jim Patrick, Joerg Pesch.   

Abstract

Patients with high-frequency deafness and/or substantial residual hearing across frequencies might benefit from combined electro-acoustic stimulation. The Hybrid-L electrode was designed to address the issues of both hearing conservation and effective electrical stimulation in those recipients. The electrode with 22 contacts should be inserted through the round window membrane, and covers approximately 270 degrees of the basal turn of the cochlear. This insertion length is equivalent to the one seen in many patients using the former Nucleus straight electrode. Twenty-four patients with low-frequency thresholds of 60 dB or better, up to 500 Hz, were implanted with a Hybrid-L device in a clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover. Another group of 8 recipients with less residual hearing was included under extended inclusion criteria. Residual hearing was conserved in the majority of cases. One patient had a loss of more than 30 dB, but hearing partially recovered after 9 months. The median loss in all patients was 10 dB in both the Hybrid group and the extended group. Patients were able to use the residual hearing postoperatively to the same extent as preoperatively. In the Hybrid mode (cochlear implant + ipsilateral hearing aid), patients showed a significant improvement of 21% (p = 0.002) in speech understanding in quiet using the Freiburger Monosyllabic Word Test compared to the preoperative scores under aided conditions with their hearing aid. The Oldenburg Sentence Test in noise showed a remarkable average improvement of 10.2 dB (p < 0.001) compared to the preoperative hearing aid only mode. An additional improvement could be seen in the combined mode using an additional contralateral hearing aid. Recipients with a shorter duration of high-frequency hearing loss showed a larger benefit than those with a longer duration of hearing loss. Hearing conservation using the Hybrid-L electrode and a given surgical technique is possible with high probability in patients with high-frequency deafness or pantonal hearing loss. The use of the residual acoustic hearing offers specific advantages, especially for understanding speech in noise and for spatial hearing. (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19390172     DOI: 10.1159/000206492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  48 in total

Review 1.  [Implantable hearing aids].

Authors:  J C Luers; D Beutner; K-B Hüttenbrink
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Determination of the curling behavior of a preformed cochlear implant electrode array.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Omid Majdani; Andreas Hussong; Thomas Lenarz; Martin Leinung
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes.

Authors:  Bruce J Gantz; Camille Dunn; Jacob Oleson; Marlan Hansen; Aaron Parkinson; Christopher Turner
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Paul J Abbas; Viral D Tejani; Rachel A Scheperle; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  [Aspects of inner ear trauma in CI treatment].

Authors:  T Klenzner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Binaural interference with simulated electric acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Chantal van Ginkel; René H Gifford; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Impact of the round window membrane accessibility on hearing preservation in adult cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Marjan Mirsalehi; Saleh Mohebbi; Mahsa Ghajarzadeh; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 8.  A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-03

9.  Self-reported spatial hearing abilities across different cochlear implant profiles.

Authors:  Ann E Perreau; Hua Ou; Richard Tyler; Camille Dunn
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Henryk Skarzynski; Artur Lorens; Marek Polak; Colin L W Driscoll; Peter Roland; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.