Literature DB >> 19390001

Effect of a peripheral nerve block on torque produced by repetitive electrical stimulation.

Olle Lagerquist1, Lee D Walsh, Jean-Sébastien Blouin, David F Collins, Simon C Gandevia.   

Abstract

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) generates contractions by activation of motor axons (peripheral mechanism), but the afferent volley also contributes by recruiting spinal motoneurons synaptically (central mechanism), which recruits motoneurons according to Henneman's size principle. Thus, we hypothesized that contractions that develop due to a combination of peripheral and central mechanisms will fatigue less rapidly than when electrically evoked contractions are generated by the activation of motor axons alone. Plantar-flexion torque evoked by NMES over the triceps surae was compared in five able-bodied subjects before (Intact) and during (Blocked) a complete anesthetic block of the tibial and common peroneal nerves. In the Blocked condition, plantar-flexion torque could only develop from the direct activation of motor axons beneath the stimulating electrodes. NMES was delivered using three protocols: protocol A, constant 100 Hz for 30 s; protocol B, four 2-s bursts of 100 Hz alternating with 20-Hz stimulation; and protocol C, alternating 100 Hz bursts (1 s on, 1 s off) for 30 s. The percent change in evoked plantar flexion torque from the beginning to the end of the stimulation differed (P < 0.05) between Intact and Blocked conditions for all protocols (Intact: protocol A = +125%, B = +230%, C = +78%; Blocked: protocol A = -79%, B = -15%, C = -35%). These results corroborate previous evidence that NMES can evoke contractions via the recruitment of spinal motoneurons in addition to the direct recruitment of motor axons. We now show that NMES delivered for periods of up to 30 s generates plantar-flexion torque which decreases when only motor axons are recruited and increases when the central nervous system can contribute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19390001     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91635.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  13 in total

1.  The effects of wide pulse neuromuscular electrical stimulation on elbow flexion torque in individuals with chronic hemiparetic stroke.

Authors:  J M Clair-Auger; D F Collins; J P A Dewald
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Extra forces evoked during electrical stimulation of the muscle or its nerve are generated and modulated by a length-dependent intrinsic property of muscle in humans and cats.

Authors:  Alain Frigon; Christopher K Thompson; Michael D Johnson; Marin Manuel; T George Hornby; C J Heckman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  High-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation modulates interhemispheric inhibition in healthy humans.

Authors:  Nicolas Gueugneau; Sidney Grosprêtre; Paul Stapley; Romuald Lepers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley.

Authors:  A J Bergquist; J M Clair; O Lagerquist; C S Mang; Y Okuma; D F Collins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Pulse Width Does Not Influence the Gains Achieved With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Double-Blind, Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Awad M Almuklass; Leah Davis; Landon D Hamilton; Jeffrey R Hebert; Enrique Alvarez; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 3.919

6.  Impact of stimulation frequency on neuromuscular fatigue.

Authors:  Florian Vitry; Alain Martin; Maria Papaiordanidou
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Distributed stimulation increases force elicited with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Danielle R Lockwood; Cynthia J Doane; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  Fatigue modulates synchronous but not asynchronous soleus activation during stimulation of paralyzed muscle.

Authors:  Richard K Shields; Shauna Dudley-Javoroski
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-11       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Mitigation of excessive fatigue associated with functional electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Alie J Buckmire; Tapas J Arakeri; J P Reinhard; Andrew J Fuglevand
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 5.379

10.  Responders to Wide-Pulse, High-Frequency Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Show Reduced Metabolic Demand: A 31P-MRS Study in Humans.

Authors:  Jennifer Wegrzyk; Alexandre Fouré; Yann Le Fur; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Christophe Vilmen; Maxime Guye; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Nicolas Place; David Bendahan; Julien Gondin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.