Literature DB >> 19387167

Nipple-sparing mastectomy: evaluation of patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and sensation.

Janet H Yueh1, Mary Jane Houlihan, Sumner A Slavin, Bernard T Lee, Susan E Pories, Donald J Morris.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe our experience with nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction, with particular attention to patient satisfaction, aesthetic results, and nipple sensation. Immediate reconstruction was performed on 17 breasts in 10 patients, using either implants or autologous tissue flaps. Assessment of outcomes was performed through patient interviews, a self-reported patient satisfaction survey and review of postoperative photographs. Short-term complications included partial loss of the nipple-areolar complex requiring debridement (n = 3) and removal of the nipple-areolar complex (n = 2) for occult ductal carcinoma in situ. While all patients with completed breast reconstructions were satisfied with their general reconstructive experience, 6 of 9 patients were aesthetically satisfied with their breast reconstruction. Postoperative nipple sensation was reported in 75% of patients, although sensation was low (mean of 2.8 of 10). As nipple-sparing mastectomy is becoming an increasing patient preference, preoperative discussion needs to address expectations, aesthetic satisfaction, and long-term cancer control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19387167     DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31819fb1ac

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  23 in total

Review 1.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy--is it worth the risk?

Authors:  Jean-Yves Petit; Umberto Veronesi; Visnu Lohsiriwat; PierCarlo Rey; Giuseppe Curigliano; Stefano Martella; Cristina Garusi; Francesca De Lorenzi; Andrea Manconi; Edoardo Botteri; Florence Didier; Roberto Orecchia; Mario Rietjens
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 2.  Anatomy relevant to conservative mastectomy.

Authors:  Rachel L O'Connell; Jennifer E Rusby
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  What is the evidence behind conservative mastectomies?

Authors:  Nicola Rocco; Giuseppe Catanuto; Maurizio Bruno Nava
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

4.  Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.

Authors:  Cindy H Wei; Amie M Scott; Alison N Price; Helen Catherine Miller; Anne F Klassen; Sabrina M Jhanwar; Babak J Mehrara; Joseph J Disa; Colleen McCarthy; Evan Matros; Peter G Cordeiro; Virgilio Sacchini; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 5.  Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts.

Authors:  Gustavo Zucca-Matthes; Cícero Urban; André Vallejo
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

6.  Nipple-areolar complex reconstruction and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ellen S Satteson; Benjamin J Brown; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

7.  Quantitative assessment of nipple perfusion with near-infrared fluorescence imaging.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Ashitate; Bernard T Lee; Long H Ngo; Rita G Laurence; Merlijn Hutteman; Rafiou Oketokoun; Elaine Lunsford; Hak Soo Choi; John V Frangioni
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.539

Review 8.  Oncologic safety of conservative mastectomy in the therapeutic setting.

Authors:  John R Benson; Dorin Dumitru; Charles M Malata
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-02

9.  A guide to qualitative research in plastic surgery.

Authors:  Melissa J Shauver; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Prospective evaluation of the nipple-areola complex sparing mastectomy for risk reduction and for early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Jamie L Wagner; Regina Fearmonti; Kelly K Hunt; Rosa F Hwang; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Henry M Kuerer; Isabelle Bedrosian; Melissa A Crosby; Donald P Baumann; Merrick I Ross; Barry W Feig; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Mike Hernandez; Gildy V Babiera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.