Literature DB >> 19385890

Community-based participatory research and the ethics review process.

Nancy Shore1.   

Abstract

THIS EXPLORATORY STUDY EXAMINES the experiences of community-based participatory researchers' (CBPR) with the IRB. CBPR is oftentimes applied to non-clinical questions where academic researchers collaborate with community partners to address local concerns. Constant Comparative Method guided the analysis of ten CBPR interviews. The interview questions included: How does your conceptualization of research coincide with the regulations' definition? How are community partners involved in the IRB process? What are the benefits/challenges of the IRB process? And, what recommendations do you have to strengthen the IRB process? The article concludes with suggestions for IRB reviewers and CBPR partners on how to facilitate the review of CBPR projects.

Year:  2007        PMID: 19385890     DOI: 10.1525/jer.2007.2.1.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  10 in total

1.  Perceived impact of human subjects protection training on community partners in community-based participatory research.

Authors:  Nancy C Hawley; Mark L Wieland; Jennifer A Weis; Irene G Sia
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2014

2.  Translating cancer prevention and control research into the community setting: workforce implications.

Authors:  J Phil Harrop; David E Nelson; Darrah Goo Kuratani; Patricia Dolan Mullen; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The limits of traditional approaches to informed consent for genomic medicine.

Authors:  Thomas May; Kaija L Zusevics; Arthur Derse; Kimberly A Strong; Jessica Jeruzal; Alison La Pean Kirschner; Michael H Farrell; Ryan Spellecy
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-09

4.  Awareness of Federal Regulatory Mechanisms Relevant to Community-Engaged Research: Survey of Health Disparities-Oriented NIH-Funded Investigators.

Authors:  Stephanie M Fullerton; Emily E Anderson; Ketch Cowan; Rachel C Malen; Doug Brugge
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Patricia J Piechowski
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.742

6.  Community-Engaged Research Ethics Review: Exploring Flexibility in Federal Regulations.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon Cargill; Debra DeBruin; Milton Eder; Elizabeth Heitman; Julie M Kaberry; Jennifer B McCormick; Jennifer Opp; Richard Sharp; A Hal Strelnick; Sabune J Winkler; Mark Yarborough; Emily E Anderson
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2016 May-Jun

7.  "A cohort of pirate ships": biomedical citizen scientists' attitudes toward ethical oversight.

Authors:  Meredith Trejo; Isabel Canfield; Whitney Bash Brooks; Alex Pearlman; Christi J Guerrini
Journal:  Citiz Sci       Date:  2021-05-20

8.  Views of academic and community partners regarding participant protections and research integrity: a pilot focus group study.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.742

9.  Piloting a nationally disseminated, interactive human subjects protection program for community partners: design, content, and evaluation.

Authors:  Stephanie Solomon; Brenda Eakin; Rosalind Kirk; Patricia Piechowski; Barbara Thomas
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 10.  Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Stephanie Solomon; Elizabeth Heitman; James M DuBois; Celia B Fisher; Rhonda G Kost; Mary Ellen Lawless; Cornelia Ramsey; Bonnie Jones; Alice Ammerman; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.