| Literature DB >> 19383136 |
Amika S Singh1, Mai Jm Chinapaw, Johannes Brug, Stef Pj Kremers, Tommy Ls Visscher, Willem van Mechelen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The threats posed by the rising prevalence of overweight and obesity on public health have been widely acknowledged. Several population groups, which deserve special attention because of their higher prevalence rates, have been identified. These include adolescents and ethnic sub-groups. The aim of the present study was twofold: (1) to assess ethnic differences in body mass index (BMI) and in behaviours that are related to both energy intake and energy expenditure, and (2) to examine whether these behaviours explain the relationship between ethnicity and BMI.Entities:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19383136 PMCID: PMC2683790 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-6-23
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ISSN: 1479-5868 Impact factor: 6.457
Figure 1Mediated relationship (according to Baron and Kenny [26])
Figure 2Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as a mediator variable of the relationship between BMI and ethnicity (Dutch versus Non-Western)
Demographic and anthropometric variables in Dutch and Non-Western adolescents
| Characteristics | Dutch | Non-Western | Dutch | Non-Western | ||
| age, y | 12.7 (.4) | 13.0 (.7) | .039 | 12.6 (.5) | 12.8 (.5) | .054 |
| height, cm | 159.3 (8.2) | 157.9 (8.1) | .163 | 158.3 (7.3) | 156.1 (7.7) | .182 |
| weight, kg | 47.0 (9.9) | 49.9 (9.6) | .169 | 47.8 (9.5) | 51.2 (12.0) | .066 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 18.4 (2.8) | 19.9 (3.0) | .000 | 19.0 (3.0) | 20.9 (3.9) | .003 |
| overweight, No. (%)† | 56 (13.7) | 13 (20.3) | .007 | 64 (15.0) | 14 (24.6) | .001 |
Data are presented as mean (SD) unless stated otherwise
* comparing Dutch and Non-Westerners, using the Kolmogorov Smirnov Test (all variables, except for %overweight/%obese), and the Pearson Chi-square (%overweight/% obese)
† using cut-off values described by Cole et al. [19]
Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) in Dutch and Non-Western boys
| EBRBs | n | mean (std) | median | mean (std) | median | |
| television viewing | 451 | 164 (96.8) | 141 (94.3 – 212) | 191 (108) | 180 (86.8 – 267) | .074 |
| computer use | 433 | 123 (86.0) | 98 (60.0 – 178) | 141 (80.7) | 129 (77.1 – 30.0) | .275 |
| active transport to school | 469 | 38.0 (29.6) | 30.0 (14.0 – 60.0) | 28.42 (24.9) | 30.0 (10.0 – 30.0) | .006 |
| organized sports | 322 | 33.8 (19.6) | 32.1 (18.6 – 42.9) | 34.2 (20.3) | 28.6 (21.4 – 49.3) | .275 |
| unorganized sports | 245 | 93.3 (111) | 51.4 (25.7 – 111) | 126 (1434) | 164 (32.1 – 159) | .912 |
| soft drinks | 375 | 890 (710) | 685 (347 – 1251) | 1041 (780) | 918 (153 – 1438) | .331 |
| fruit juices | 392 | 330 (391) | 171 (28.6 – 468) | 507 (499) | 386 (10.2 – 788) | .025 |
| savoury snacks | 415 | .59 (.51) | .43 (.29 – .86) | .66 (.54) | .43 (0.29 – 1.00) | .660 |
| sweet snacks | 427 | 1.58 (1.17) | 1.00 (.71 – 2.00) | 1.26 (.97) | .93 (.54 – 2.00) | .141 |
*comparing Dutch and Non-Western adolescents, using the Mann-Whitney Test
Energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) in Dutch and Non-Western girls
| EBRBs | n | mean (std) | median | mean (std) | median | |
| television viewing | 461 | 142 (86.4) | 120 (77.1 – 180) | 1867 (112) | 161 (93.8 – 272) | .033 |
| computer use | 429 | 89 (67.6) | 68.6 (34.29 – 120) | 102 (71.2) | 81.4 (60.0 – 137) | .529 |
| active transport to school | 480 | 36.8 (28.3) | 30.0 (18.0 – 60.0) | 27.3 (24.9) | 20.0 (10.0 – 30.0) | 480 |
| organized sports | 305 | 23.5 (16.4) | 19.3 (10.7 – 30.0) | 26.1 (18.6) | 18.2 (11.8 – 37.5) | 305 |
| unorganized sports | 204 | 53.4 (75.6) | 34.3 (17.1 – 51.4) | 75.4 (93.6) | 34.3 (17.1 – 90.0) | 204 |
| soft drinks | 395 | 774 (634) | 657 (281 – 1142) | 918 (700) | 714 (439 – 1189) | 395 |
| fruit juices | 396 | 326 (342) | 200 (57.1 – 486) | 476 (462) | 323 (108 – 641) | 396 |
| savoury snacks | 453 | .58 (.51) | .43 (.14 – 86) | .77 (.59) | .57 (.29 – 1.00) | .044 |
| sweet snacks | 464 | 1.38 (.98) | 1.00 (.57 – 2.00) | 1.23 (1.10) | .86 (.43 – 2.00) | .094 |
*comparing Dutch and Non-Western adolescents, using the Mann-Whitney Test
Differences between Dutch, Non-Western immigrants, and Western immigrants with regard to energy balance-related behaviours. Data are presented as mean (SD)
| Dutch | Non-Western immigrants | Western immigrants | |
| television viewing | 164 (96.8) | 191 (108) | 222 (148) |
| computer use | 123 (86.0) | 141 (80.7) | 115 (39.2) |
| soft drink consumption | 890 (710) | 1041 (780) | 930 (972) |
| fruit juice consumption | 330 (391.29) | 507 (499) | 451 (540) |
| active transport to school | 38 (29.6) | 28.4 (24.9) | 26 (11.4) |
| savoury snack consumption | .59 (.51) | .66 (.54) | .69 (.68) |
| sweet snack consumption | 1.58 (1.17) | 1.26 (.97) | 1.60 (1.46) |
| television viewing | 142 (86.4) | 187 (112) | 139 (52.9) |
| computer use | 89.0 (67.6) | 102 (71.2) | 104 (104) |
| soft drink consumption | 774 (634) | 918 (700) | 706 (800) |
| fruit juice consumption | 326 (342) | 476 (462) | 290 (410) |
| active transport to school | 36.8 (28.30) | 27.3 (24.9) | 35.3 (47.4) |
| savoury snack consumption | .58 (.51) | .77 (.59) | .71 (.25) |
| sweet snack consumption | 1.38 (.98) | 1.23 (1.10) | 1.71 (.49) |
Results of testing the mediational model: energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as mediators of the relationship between ethnicity and BMI (criteria 1 and 2)
| unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI) | SE* | unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI) | SE* | |
| BMI | 1.54 (.80 – 2.28) | .37 | 1.86 (1.00 – 2.72) | .44 |
| television viewing | 26.75 (.30 – 53.21) | 13.46 | 44.28 (18.73 – 69.82) | 13.00 |
| computer use | 17.63 (-6.58 – 41.84) | 12.32 | 13.14 (-6.88 – 33.16) | 10.18 |
| active transport to school | -9.60 (-17.27 – -1.93) | 3.90 | -9.46 (-17.26 – -1.66) | 3.97 |
| organized sports | .41 (-6.52 – 7.33) | 3.52 | 2.62 (-6.26 – 11.49) | 4.51 |
| unorganised sports | 32.52 (-6.69 – 71.73) | 19.91 | 22.07 (-8.97 – 53.12) | 15.75 |
| soft drinks | 151.03 (-73.48 – 375.54) | 114.12 | 143.79 (-60.01 – 347.59) | 103.66 |
| fruit juices | 177.13 (54.22 – 300.05) | 62.52 | 150.27 (38.07 – 262.47) | 57.07 |
| savoury snacks | .07 (-.08 – .22) | .08 | .19 (.03 – .34) | .08 |
| sweet snacks | -.32 (-.65 – .01) | .17 | -.15 (-.44 – .14) | .17 |
*SE = standard error
†regression model with BMI as criterion variable and ethnicity as predictor variable
‡regression model with EBRBs as criterion variable and ethnicity as predictor variable
Results of testing the mediational model: energy balance-related behaviours (EBRBs) as mediators of the relationship between ethnicity and BMI (criteria 3 and 4)
| unstandardized regression coefficient (95% CI) | % mediation | SE* | Sobel | P value (Sobel) | |
| television viewing | 1.45 (.69 – 2.21) | 5.8 | .39 | 2.73 | .006 |
| active transport to school | 1.49 (.75 – 2.23) | 3.3 | .38 | 2.81 | .005 |
| fruit juices consumption | 1.29 (.43 – 2.16) | 16.2 | .44 | 2.35 | .02 |
| savoury snacks consumption | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| 1. 16 (.28 – 2.05) | 24.7 | .45 | 2.15 | .03 | |
| Television viewing | 1.55 (.68 – 2.42) | 16.7 | .44 | 2.66 | .008 |
| active transport to school | 1.75 (.87 – 2.62) | 5.9 | .44 | 2.86 | .004 |
| fruit juices consumption | 2.22 (1.23 – 3.21) | S | .50 | 3.02 | .003 |
| 1.75 (.89 – 2.61) | 5.9 | .44 | 2.86 | .004 | |
| 1.39 (.42 – 2.37) | 25.3 | .50 | 2.28 | .02 | |
*SE = standard error
†regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and EBRBs and ethnicity as predictor variables
‡regression model with BMI as the criterion variable and television viewing, active transport to school, fruit juices, and savoury snacks (girls only)
NA = not applicable
S = suppression effect
Figure 3Model depicting the associations between ethnicity (independent variable) and BMI (outcome variable), mediated by energy balance-related behaviours (mediator variables). Correlation coefficients are presented in parentheses for boys and girls, respectively