Literature DB >> 19383056

'Getting your life back on track after stroke': a Phase II multi-centered, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of the Stroke Self-Management Program vs. the Stanford Chronic Condition Self-Management Program or standard care in stroke survivors.

M Battersby1, S Hoffmann, D Cadilhac, R Osborne, E Lalor, R Lindley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-management is seen as a primary mechanism to support the optimization of care for people with chronic diseases such as symptomatic vascular disease. There are no established and evidence-based stroke-specific chronic disease self-management programs. Our aim is to evaluate whether a stroke-specific program is safe and feasible as part of a Phase II randomized-controlled clinical trial.
METHODS: Stroke survivors are recruited from a variety of sources including: hospital stroke services, local paper advertisements, Stroke South Australia newsletter (volunteer peer support organization), Divisions of General Practice, and community service providers across Adelaide, South Australia. Subjects are invited to participate in a multi-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Eligible participants are randomized to either; * standard care, * standard care plus a six week generic chronic condition self-management group education program, or, * standard care plus an eight week stroke specific self-management education group program. Interventions are conducted after discharge from hospital. Participants are assessed at baseline, immediate post intervention and six months. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome measures determine study feasibility and safety, measuring, recruitment, participation, compliance and adverse events. Secondary outcomes include: * positive and active engagement in life measured by the Health Education Impact Questionnaire, * improvements in quality of life measured by the Assessment of Quality of Life instrument, * improvements in mood measured by the Irritability, Depression and Anxiety Scale, * health resource utilization measured by a participant held diary and safety.
CONCLUSION: The results of this study will determine whether a definitive Phase III efficacy trial is justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19383056     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00261.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  13 in total

1.  Feasibility study of a targeted self-management intervention for reducing stroke risk factors in a high-risk population in Uganda.

Authors:  Mark Kaddumukasa; Jane Nakibuuka; Levicatus Mugenyi; Olivia Namusoke; Doreen Birungi; Bryan Kabaala; Carol Blixen; Elly Katabira; Anthony Furlan; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 3.181

2.  Stroke recovery and prevention barriers among young african-american men: potential avenues to reduce health disparities.

Authors:  Carol Blixen; Adam Perzynski; Jamie Cage; Kathleen Smyth; Shirley Moore; Cathy Sila; Svetlana Pundik; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.119

3.  A Targeted Self-Management Approach for Reducing Stroke Risk Factors in African American Men Who Have Had a Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack.

Authors:  Martha Sajatovic; Curtis Tatsuoka; Elisabeth Welter; Kari Colon-Zimmermann; Carol Blixen; Adam T Perzynski; Shelly Amato; Jamie Cage; Johnny Sams; Shirley M Moore; Svetlana Pundik; Sophia Sundararajan; Charles Modlin; Cathy Sila
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2017-03-06

4.  Implementation of a stroke self-management program: A randomized controlled pilot study of veterans with stroke.

Authors:  Teresa M Damush; Susan Ofner; Zhangsheng Yu; Laurie Plue; Gloria Nicholas; Linda S Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Peer education for secondary stroke prevention in inner-city minorities: design and methods of the prevent recurrence of all inner-city strokes through education randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Judith Z Goldfinger; Ian M Kronish; Kezhen Fei; Albert Graciani; Peri Rosenfeld; Kate Lorig; Carol R Horowitz
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 6.  Systematic Review of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Michael J McCarthy; Elaine L Miller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 10.170

7.  Necessary and sufficient causes of participation post-stroke: practical and philosophical perspectives.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; David Bronstein; Susan C Scott; Lois E Finch; Sydney Miller
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Community Perceptions of Barriers to Stroke Recovery and Prevention in Greater Kampala, Uganda: Implications for Policy and Practice.

Authors:  Carol Blixen; Jane Nakibuuka; Mark Kaddumukasa; Haddy Nalubwama; Mathew Amollo; Elly Katabira; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  Int J Healthc       Date:  2017-06-05

Review 9.  Self management programmes for quality of life in people with stroke.

Authors:  Caroline E Fryer; Julie A Luker; Michelle N McDonnell; Susan L Hillier
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-08-22

Review 10.  Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  Anne Forster; Lesley Brown; Jane Smith; Allan House; Peter Knapp; John J Wright; John Young
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.