Literature DB >> 35264010

Systematic Review of the Evidence for Stroke Family Caregiver and Dyad Interventions.

Tamilyn Bakas1, Michael J McCarthy2, Elaine L Miller1.   

Abstract

Stroke family caregiver and dyad literature has expanded over the past few years. The purpose of this review was to build upon 2 prior systematic reviews to critique, analyze, and synthesize the evidence pertaining to the impact of family caregiver and dyad interventions on stroke survivor and family caregiver outcomes. CINAHL, PsychINFO, PubMed, and reference lists were searched from December 1, 2016 through March 31, 2021. Using PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), articles were identified that tested outcomes from stroke family caregiver or dyad interventions that targeted the health or well-being of family caregivers. Data from the articles were abstracted into tables for analysis, then compared with recommendations from the 2 prior systematic reviews. A total of 18 articles met inclusion criteria (10 caregiver interventions; 8 dyad interventions) representing sample sizes ranging from 7 to 349 caregivers or dyads. Most were randomized controlled trials (n=13); 2 were cluster randomized trials; and 3 were single-group quasi-experimental designs. Of the 18 studies, 8 had <50 caregivers or dyads and 5 were small feasibility studies that reported data trends rather than testing for significance. Only 6 studies reported significant survivor outcomes. Eleven studies reported significant caregiver outcomes, the most common being burden. A number of survivor and caregiver outcomes were not significant, or only significant for certain subgroups. The limited number of studies, small sample sizes, and conflicting results, made it difficult to draw firm conclusions regarding the impact of these interventions on outcomes. Based on the available evidence from these 18 studies, recommendations from the 2 prior reviews were generally supported. Well-designed and well-powered randomized controlled clinical trials are still needed to confirm efficacy of stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caregiver; clinical trials; feasibility studies; stroke; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35264010      PMCID: PMC9133104          DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   10.170


  46 in total

Review 1.  The Impact of Technology-Based Interventions on Informal Caregivers of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Abdulkarim Yousef Aldehaim; Faisal F Alotaibi; Constance R Uphold; Stuti Dang
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 2.  Global Burden of Stroke.

Authors:  Mira Katan; Andreas Luft
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.420

3.  Family-Centered Care During Constraint-Induced Therapy After Chronic Stroke: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Sarah Blanton; Deborah Cussen Scheibe; Ashley Holmes Rutledge; Bridget Regan; Colleen Schwartz O'Sullivan; Patricia C Clark
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 1.625

4.  CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 5.  Evidence for stroke family caregiver and dyad interventions: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and American Stroke Association.

Authors:  Tamilyn Bakas; Patricia C Clark; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Rosemarie B King; Barbara J Lutz; Elaine L Miller
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Effectiveness of two home ergonomic programs in reducing pain and enhancing quality of life in informal caregivers of post-stroke patients: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Karen Lucia de Araújo Freitas Moreira; Gracia María Ábalos-Medina; Carmen Villaverde-Gutiérrez; Neide María Gomes de Lucena; Anderson Belmont Correia de Oliveira; José Manuel Pérez-Mármol
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.554

Review 7.  Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions.

Authors:  Heather M Young; Janice F Bell; Robin L Whitney; Ronit A Ridberg; Sarah C Reed; Peter P Vitaliano
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2020-02-14

8.  Effect of education and muscle relaxation program on anxiety, depression and care burden in caregivers of acute stroke survivors: A randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Jinhong Wang; Jie Liu; Ling Li; Jing Man; Shihong Yue; Zhaojun Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Organising Support for Carers of Stroke Survivors (OSCARSS): a cluster randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.

Authors:  Emma Patchwood; Kate Woodward-Nutt; Sarah A Rhodes; Evridiki Batistatou; Elizabeth Camacho; Sarah Knowles; Sarah Darley; Gunn Grande; Gail Ewing; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Marriage and Post-stroke Aphasia: The Long-Time Effects of Group Therapy of Fluent and Non-fluent Aphasic Patients and Their Spouses.

Authors:  Anna Rasmus; Edyta Orłowska
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-07-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Addressing Uncertainty in Informal Familial Caregivers of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Gabriella T Ponzini; Brenna Kirk; Sarah E Segear; Elizabeth A Claydon; Elizabeth B Engler-Chiurazzi; Shari A Steinman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.