Literature DB >> 19382100

Psychological distress and use of psychosocial support in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Kirsten F L Douma1, Neil K Aaronson, Hans F A Vasen, Miranda A Gerritsma, Chad M Gundy, Esther P A Janssen, Annette H J T Vriends, Annemieke Cats, Senno Verhoef, Eveline M A Bleiker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is characterized by multiple adenomas in the colorectum with a high risk to develop colorectal cancer. It is unclear whether individuals at risk of FAP experience distress due to this potentially life-threatening disease. This nationwide study assessed: (1) the prevalence of psychological distress; and (2) the need for and use of specialized professional psychosocial support.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, all individuals from families at high risk for FAP registered at the Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours were invited to complete a questionnaire assessing, among other issues, generalized, cancer-specific and FAP-specific distress.
RESULTS: In total, 525 individuals completed the questionnaire. Approximately 20% of the respondents had moderate to severe levels of FAP-specific distress. Levels of generalized distress were comparable to the general Dutch population. Significantly more individuals with a FAP diagnosis had frequent cancer worries than those at risk of FAP or non-carriers (p=0.02). Distress levels were more strongly associated with psychosocial variables (e.g. perceived cancer risk), than with sociodemographic or clinical variables. Up to 43% of the variance in distress could be explained by all variables combined. Of those moderately to severely distressed, 26% had received specialized professional psychosocial support, while 30% of those did not receive the support they wanted.
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of individuals reported moderate to severe distress levels associated with FAP. However, only one-third of those received specialized professional psychosocial support. We recommend the use of a screening questionnaire to identify individuals in need of such support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19382100     DOI: 10.1002/pon.1570

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  33 in total

1.  Considering the Role of Stress in Populations of High-Risk, Underserved Community Networks Program Centers.

Authors:  James R Hébert; Kathryn L Braun; Joseph Keawe'aimoku Kaholokula; Cheryl A Armstead; James B Burch; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer - a literature review.

Authors:  Willem Eijzenga; Daniela E E Hahn; Neil K Aaronson; Irma Kluijt; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF FAMILIES WITH HEREDITARY COLORECTAL CANCER SYNDROMES.

Authors:  Monica Dandapani; Elena M Stoffel
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-06-01

4.  Long-term psychosocial and behavioral adjustment in individuals receiving genetic test results in Lynch syndrome.

Authors:  M J Esplen; J Wong; M Aronson; K Butler; H Rothenmund; K Semotiuk; L Madlensky; C Way; E Dicks; J Green; S Gallinger
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 4.438

5.  Theoretical Rationale and Case Illustration of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Fear of Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Christina M Luberto; Daniel L Hall; Emma Chad-Friedman; Elyse R Park
Journal:  J Clin Psychol Med Settings       Date:  2019-12

6.  Psychosocial morbidity in TP53 mutation carriers: is whole-body cancer screening beneficial?

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Mandy L Ballinger; Timothy E Schlub; Mary-Anne Young; Martin H N Tattersall; Judy Kirk; Ros Eeles; Emma Killick; Leslie G Walker; Sue Shanley; David M Thomas; Gillian Mitchell
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Patient experience and utility of genetic information: a cross-sectional study among patients tested for cancer susceptibility and thrombophilia.

Authors:  Elvira D'Andrea; Tyra Lagerberg; Corrado De Vito; Erica Pitini; Carolina Marzuillo; Azzurra Massimi; Maria Rosaria Vacchio; Paola Grammatico; Paolo Villari
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-01-26       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Health behaviors in patients and families with hereditary colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Allison M Burton; Shelly R Hovick; Susan K Peterson
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-06

9.  Experience Gained from the Development and Execution of a Multidisciplinary Multi-syndrome Hereditary Colon Cancer Family Conference.

Authors:  Ilana Solomon; Christina Rybak; Lily Van Tongeren; Lili Kuzmich; Kathleen Blazer; Bita Nehoray; Mariana Niell-Swiller; Shawnie Bray; Travis H Bray; Karen Hurley; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Thomas P Slavin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.037

10.  Long-term positive psychological outcomes in an Australian pancreatic cancer screening program.

Authors:  R S O'Neill; B Meiser; S Emmanuel; D B Williams; A Stoita
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.