Literature DB >> 28124295

Psychosocial morbidity in TP53 mutation carriers: is whole-body cancer screening beneficial?

Kate A McBride1,2, Mandy L Ballinger3, Timothy E Schlub4, Mary-Anne Young5, Martin H N Tattersall6, Judy Kirk7, Ros Eeles8, Emma Killick9, Leslie G Walker10, Sue Shanley5, David M Thomas3, Gillian Mitchell5,11.   

Abstract

Germline TP53 mutation carriers are at high risk of developing a range of cancers. Effective cancer risk management is an important issue for these individuals. We assessed the psychosocial impact in TP53 mutation carriers of WB-MRI screening as part of the Surveillance in Multi-Organ Cancer (SMOC+) protocol, measuring their unmet needs, anxiety and depression levels as well as cancer worry using psychological questionnaires and in-depth interviews about their experiences of screening. We present preliminary psychosocial findings from 17 participants during their first 12 months on the trial. We found a significant reduction in participants' mean anxiety from baseline to two weeks post WB-MRI (1.2, 95% CI 0.17 to 2.23 p = 0.025), indicative of some benefit. Emerging qualitative themes show most participants are emotionally supported and contained by the screening program and are motivated by their immediate concern about staying alive, despite being informed about the current lack of evidence around efficacy of screening for people with TP53 mutations in terms of cancer morbidity or mortality. For those that do gain emotional reassurance from participating in the screening study, feelings of abandonment by the research team are a risk when the study ends. For others, screening was seen as a burden, consistent with the relentless nature of cancer risk associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, though these patients still declared they wished to participate due to their concern with staying alive. Families with TP53 mutations need ongoing support due to the impact on the whole family system. These findings suggest a comprehensive multi-organ screening program for people with TP53 mutations provides psychological benefit independent of an impact on cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. The benefits of a multi-organ screening program will be greater still if the screening tests additionally reduce the cancer morbidity and mortality associated with the syndrome. These findings may also inform the care of individuals and families with other multi-organ cancer predisposition syndromes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hereditary cancer; Li-Fraumeni syndrome; Mixed methods; Psychosocial; Screening; TP53

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28124295     DOI: 10.1007/s10689-016-9964-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  32 in total

1.  Segregation analysis of cancer in families of childhood soft-tissue-sarcoma patients.

Authors:  E D Lustbader; W R Williams; M L Bondy; S Strom; L C Strong
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Randomized controlled trial of a telephone-based peer-support program for women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: impact on psychological distress.

Authors:  Victoria M White; Mary-Anne Young; Ashley Farrelly; Bettina Meiser; Michael Jefford; Elizabeth Williamson; Sandra Ieropoli; Jessica Duffy; Ingrid Winship
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Breast cancer and distress resulting from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): the impact of a psychological intervention of emotional and informative support.

Authors:  A Caruso; L Bongiorno; L Vallini; P Russo; F Tomao; M L Grandinetti
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-12

4.  Germline p53 mutations in a cohort with childhood sarcoma: sex differences in cancer risk.

Authors:  Shih-Jen Hwang; Guillermina Lozano; Christopher I Amos; Louise C Strong
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-02-27       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Revisiting Li-Fraumeni Syndrome From TP53 Mutation Carriers.

Authors:  Gaëlle Bougeard; Mariette Renaux-Petel; Jean-Michel Flaman; Camille Charbonnier; Pierre Fermey; Muriel Belotti; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Emilie Consolino; Laurence Brugières; Olivier Caron; Patrick R Benusiglio; Brigitte Bressac-de Paillerets; Valérie Bonadona; Catherine Bonaïti-Pellié; Julie Tinat; Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont; Thierry Frebourg
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Psychological distress and use of psychosocial support in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Kirsten F L Douma; Neil K Aaronson; Hans F A Vasen; Miranda A Gerritsma; Chad M Gundy; Esther P A Janssen; Annette H J T Vriends; Annemieke Cats; Senno Verhoef; Eveline M A Bleiker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Can MRI related patient anxiety be prevented?

Authors:  Gokhan Tazegul; Erkut Etcioglu; Ferhat Yildiz; Raif Yildiz; Davut Tuney
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Regular surveillance for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: advice, adherence and perceived benefits.

Authors:  C R M Lammens; E M A Bleiker; N K Aaronson; A Wagner; R H Sijmons; M G E M Ausems; A H J T Vriends; M W G Ruijs; T A M van Os; L Spruijt; E B Gómez García; A Cats; T Nagtegaal; S Verhoef
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  An online resource of digital stories about cancer genetics: qualitative study of patient preferences and information needs.

Authors:  Rachel Iredale; Lisa Mundy; Jennifer Hilgart
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Accessing health services through the back door: a qualitative interview study investigating reasons why people participate in health research in Canada.

Authors:  Anne Townsend; Susan M Cox
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.652

View more
  18 in total

1.  Baseline Surveillance in Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Using Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mandy L Ballinger; Ana Best; Phuong L Mai; Payal P Khincha; Jennifer T Loud; June A Peters; Maria Isabel Achatz; Rubens Chojniak; Alexandre Balieiro da Costa; Karina Miranda Santiago; Judy Garber; Allison F O'Neill; Rosalind A Eeles; D Gareth Evans; Eveline Bleiker; Gabe S Sonke; Marielle Ruijs; Claudette Loo; Joshua Schiffman; Anne Naumer; Wendy Kohlmann; Louise C Strong; Jasmina Bojadzieva; David Malkin; Surya P Rednam; Elena M Stoffel; Erika Koeppe; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Thomas P Slavin; Bita Nehoray; Mark Robson; Michael Walsh; Lorenzo Manelli; Anita Villani; David M Thomas; Sharon A Savage
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Whole body MRI of the non-human primate using a clinical 3T scanner: initial experiences.

Authors:  Chun-Xia Li; Xiaodong Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2017-04

Review 3.  Recommendations for Long-Term Follow-up of Adults with Heritable Retinoblastoma.

Authors:  Emily S Tonorezos; Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Dana Barnea; Machteld I Bosscha; Guillermo Chantada; Charlotte J Dommering; Pim de Graaf; Ira J Dunkel; Armida W M Fabius; Jasmine H Francis; Mary-Louise C Greer; Ruth A Kleinerman; Wijnanda A Kors; Suzanne Laughlin; Annette C Moll; Lindsay M Morton; Petra Temming; Margaret A Tucker; Flora E van Leeuwen; Michael F Walsh; Kevin C Oeffinger; David H Abramson
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance for subsequent malignancies in preadolescent, adolescent, and young adult survivors of germline retinoblastoma: An update.

Authors:  Danielle Novetsky Friedman; Meier Hsu; Chaya S Moskowitz; Jasmine H Francis; Eric Lis; Megan Harlan Fleischut; Kevin C Oeffinger; Michael Walsh; Emily S Tonorezos; Charles A Sklar; David H Abramson; Ira J Dunkel
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Improving protocols for whole-body magnetic resonance imaging: oncological and inflammatory applications.

Authors:  Mareen S Kraus; Ayat A Yousef; Sandra L Cote; Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2022-08-19

6.  Penetrance Estimates Over Time to First and Second Primary Cancer Diagnosis in Families with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: A Single Institution Perspective.

Authors:  Seung Jun Shin; Elissa B Dodd-Eaton; Fan Gao; Jasmina Bojadzieva; Jingxiao Chen; Xianhua Kong; Christopher I Amos; Jing Ning; Louise C Strong; Wenyi Wang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) and brain MRI baseline surveillance in TP53 germline mutation carriers: experience from the Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Education and Early Detection (LEAD) clinic.

Authors:  Jasmina Bojadzieva; Behrang Amini; Suzanne F Day; Tiffiny L Jackson; Parijatham S Thomas; Brandy J Willis; Whitney R Throckmorton; Najat C Daw; Therese B Bevers; Louise C Strong
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  The psychological impact and experience of breast cancer screening in young women with an increased risk of breast cancer due to neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Ashley Crook; Rebekah Kwa; Sarah Ephraums; Mathilda Wilding; Lavvina Thiyagarajan; Jane Fleming; Katrina Moore; Yemima Berman
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.446

Review 9.  Screening of cancer predisposition syndromes.

Authors:  Haifa Al-Sarhani; Ravi V Gottumukkala; Angelo Don S Grasparil; Eric L Tung; Michael S Gee; Mary-Louise C Greer
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-01

Review 10.  Li-Fraumeni Syndrome.

Authors:  Wendy H Vogel
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.