Literature DB >> 19381701

Extraction of the first bolus passage in dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion measurements.

Peter Gall1, Irina Mader, Valerij G Kiselev.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The processing of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion measurements requires an extraction of the first bolus passage of the injected contrast agent. State-of-the-art methods employ the fit of a gamma variate function to the measured data. The use of a gamma variate function is motivated by its shape similarity to the expected relaxation rate time-course during the first bolus passage. However, the quality of this result is strongly influenced by the amount of overlap of the first and second bolus passage. In this work we present an alternative, data-driven method for the extraction of the first bolus passage from a measured relaxation time-course.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: By using prior knowledge of the injection function, the measured time-courses can be transformed to time-courses that would occur at a shorter injection duration where the two bolus passages have less overlap. This time-course is found by Tikhonov regularized deconvolution of the measured time-courses with an injection function that bases on the measurement protocol. A minimum search yields the cut-off point at which the first bolus can be extrapolated to zero. The gamma variate fit is performed using Powells algorithm. The proposed approach is compared to the gamma variate fit approach using simulations and an exemplary dataset from one healthy volunteer.
RESULTS: The new method performs comparably stable as the gamma variate function fit approach in simulations. Both methods are superior to a simple exponential extrapolation approach. Applied to volunteer data, the new method performs much faster than the gamma variate fit approach. The results obtained from both methods correspond well.
CONCLUSION: The new method offers a conceptual understanding of the first bolus passage and yields similar results to the gamma variate function fit approach but performs much faster.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19381701     DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0170-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MAGMA        ISSN: 0968-5243            Impact factor:   2.310


  14 in total

1.  Comparison of static and dynamic MRI techniques for the measurement of regional cerebral blood volume.

Authors:  O Speck; L Chang; L Itti; E Itti; T Ernst
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Automatic calculation of the arterial input function for cerebral perfusion imaging with MR imaging.

Authors:  Timothy J Carroll; Howard A Rowley; Victor M Haughton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Quantification of bolus-tracking MRI: Improved characterization of the tissue residue function using Tikhonov regularization.

Authors:  Fernando Calamante; David G Gadian; Alan Connelly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  INDICATOR TRANSIT TIME CONSIDERED AS A GAMMA VARIATE.

Authors:  H K THOMPSON; C F STARMER; R E WHALEN; H D MCINTOSH
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1964-06       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  An independent component analysis approach for minimizing effects of recirculation in dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yang Wu; Hongyu An; Hamid Krim; Weili Lin
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2006-07-19       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Automatic selection of arterial input function using cluster analysis.

Authors:  Kim Mouridsen; Søren Christensen; Louise Gyldensted; Leif Ostergaard
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Iterative blind deconvolution in magnetic resonance brain perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Renate Grüner; Torfinn Taxt
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  A single-step method for estimation of local cerebral blood volume from susceptibility contrast MRI images.

Authors:  M M Bahn
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  CBF and CBV measurements by USPIO bolus tracking: reproducibility and comparison with Gd-based values.

Authors:  C Z Simonsen; L Ostergaard; P Vestergaard-Poulsen; L Røhl; A Bjørnerud; C Gyldensted
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients.

Authors:  K M Donahue; H G Krouwer; S D Rand; A P Pathak; C S Marszalkowski; S C Censky; R W Prost
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  5 in total

1.  On the design of filters for Fourier and oSVD-based deconvolution in bolus tracking perfusion MRI.

Authors:  Peter Gall; Philipp Emerich; Birgitte F Kjølby; Elias Kellner; Irina Mader; Valerij G Kiselev
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Absolute quantification of perfusion using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: pitfalls and possibilities.

Authors:  Linda Knutsson; Freddy Ståhlberg; Ronnie Wirestam
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Susceptibility-based analysis of dynamic gadolinium bolus perfusion MRI.

Authors:  David Bonekamp; Peter B Barker; Richard Leigh; Peter C M van Zijl; Xu Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Characterization of gadolinium-based dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion measurements in permanent and transient MCAO models with volumetric based validation by CASL.

Authors:  Bernt T Bråtane; Ronn P Walvick; Claire Corot; Eric Lancelot; Marc Fisher
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Differentiation of Cerebral Neoplasms with Vessel Size Imaging (VSI).

Authors:  Asmaa Foda; Elias Kellner; Asanka Gunawardana; Xiang Gao; Martin Janz; Anna Kufner; Ahmed A Khalil; Rohat Geran; Ralf Mekle; Jochen B Fiebach; Ivana Galinovic
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.649

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.