Literature DB >> 19380554

Pediatric CT radiation dose: how low can you go?

Mervyn D Cohen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is a known risk from radiation. The objective of this article is to answer the following question regarding CT: Is there a risk of lowering the radiation exposure so low that the risk of missing a diagnosis from excessive noise in the image begins to exceed the risk of the radiation itself?
CONCLUSION: When performing CT, adequate radiation dose must be used to make a confident and accurate diagnosis. The total population radiation exposure can be reduced effectively by numerous other means, including aggressively reducing the number of CT examinations performed for poor clinical indications, scanning only the anatomic region of interest, and not performing both unenhanced and contrast-enhanced scanning unless absolutely necessary.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19380554     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  CT radiation dose reduction: can we do harm by doing good?

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-04

2.  Low-dose computed tomography of the paranasal sinus and facial skull using a high-pitch dual-source system--first clinical results.

Authors:  Boris Schell; Ralf W Bauer; Thomas Lehnert; J Matthias Kerl; Markus Hambek; Angelika May; Thomas J Vogl; Martin G Mack
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics.

Authors:  Luca Signorelli; Raphael Patcas; Timo Peltomäki; Marc Schätzle
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Low-Dose CT of the Paranasal Sinuses: Minimizing X-Ray Exposure with Spectral Shaping.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wuest; Matthias May; Marc Saake; Michael Brand; Michael Uder; Michael Lell
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  ALARA, image gently and CT-induced cancer.

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-02-14

6.  Usefulness of a lead shielding device for reducing the radiation dose to tissues outside the primary beams during CT.

Authors:  Jae-Joon Chung; Eun-Suk Cho; Sung Min Kang; Jeong-Sik Yu; Dae Jung Kim; Joo Hee Kim
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients?

Authors:  N Rathore; H M Eissa; J F Margolin; H Liu; M F Wu; T Horton; K Kamdar; Z Dreyer; P Steuber; K R Rabin; M Redell; C E Allen; K L McClain; R P Guillerman; C M Bollard
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 1.969

8.  Model-based iterative reconstruction: effect on patient radiation dose and image quality in pediatric body CT.

Authors:  Ethan A Smith; Jonathan R Dillman; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Emmanuel G Christodoulou; Nahid Keshavarzi; Peter J Strouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies.

Authors:  Rutger A J Nievelstein; Ingrid M van Dam; Aart J van der Molen
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-06-10

10.  Impact of iterative model reconstruction combined with dose reduction on the image quality of head and neck CTA in children.

Authors:  Bochao Cheng; Haoyang Xing; Du Lei; Yingkun Guo; Gang Ning; Qiyong Gong; Wu Cai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.