Literature DB >> 22632168

Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: are we over-scanning our patients?

N Rathore1, H M Eissa, J F Margolin, H Liu, M F Wu, T Horton, K Kamdar, Z Dreyer, P Steuber, K R Rabin, M Redell, C E Allen, K L McClain, R P Guillerman, C M Bollard.   

Abstract

Despite the favorable outcome of most pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), there is rising concern about risks of carcinogenesis from both diagnostic and therapeutic radiation exposure for patients treated on study protocols. Although previous studies have investigated radiation exposure during treatment, radiation from post-treatment surveillance imaging may also increase the likelihood of secondary malignancies. All diagnostic imaging examinations involving ionizing radiation exposure performed for surveillance following completion of therapy were recorded for 99 consecutive pediatric patients diagnosed with HL from 2000 to 2010. Cumulative radiation dosage from these examinations and the frequency of relapse detection by these examinations were recorded. In the first 2 years following completion of therapy, patients in remission received a median of 11 examinations (range 0-26). Only 13 of 99 patients relapsed, 11 within 5 months of treatment completion. No relapse was detected by 1- or 2-view chest radiographs (n = 38 and 296, respectively), abdomen/pelvis computed tomography (CT) scans (n = 211), or positron emission tomography (PET) scans alone (n = 11). However, 10/391 (2.6%) of chest CT scans, 4/364 (1.1%) of neck CT scans, and 3/47 (6.4%) of PET/CT scans detected relapsed disease. Thus, only 17 scans (1.3%) detected relapse in a total of 1358 scans. Mean radiation dosages were 31.97 mSv for Stage 1, 37.76 mSv for Stage 2, 48.08 mSv for Stage 3, and 51.35 mSv for Stage 4 HL. Approximately 1% of surveillance imaging examinations identified relapsed disease. Given the very low rate of relapse detection by surveillance imaging stipulated by current protocols for pediatric HL patients, the financial burden of the tests themselves, the high cure rate, and risks of second malignancy from ionizing radiation exposure, modification of the surveillance strategy is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22632168      PMCID: PMC3685486          DOI: 10.3109/08880018.2012.684198

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0888-0018            Impact factor:   1.969


  20 in total

1.  Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

2.  Cumulative effective doses from radiologic procedures for pediatric oncology patients.

Authors:  Bilal A Ahmed; Bairbre L Connolly; Puneet Shroff; Amy Lee Chong; Christopher Gordon; Ronald Grant; Mark L Greenberg; Karen E Thomas
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Pediatric CT radiation dose: how low can you go?

Authors:  Mervyn D Cohen
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Role of active follow-up for early diagnosis of relapse after elective end of therapies.

Authors:  Simona Biasotti; Alberto Garaventa; Paola Padovani; Maura Faraci; Francesca Fioredda; Guia Hanau; Francesca Grisolia; Stefano Parodi; Riccardo Haupt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Newer CT applications and their alternatives: what is appropriate in children?

Authors:  R Paul Guillerman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17

Review 6.  [Diagnostic radiation exposure in children and cancer risk: current knowledge and perspectives].

Authors:  H Baysson; C Etard; H J Brisse; M-O Bernier
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2011-11-29       Impact factor: 1.180

7.  Imaging in pediatric patients: time to think again about surveillance.

Authors:  Amy Lee Chong; Ronald M Grant; Bilal A Ahmed; Karen E Thomas; Bairbre L Connolly; Mark Greenberg
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.167

8.  Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Malcolm A Smith; Nita L Seibel; Sean F Altekruse; Lynn A G Ries; Danielle L Melbert; Maura O'Leary; Franklin O Smith; Gregory H Reaman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958-1998.

Authors:  D L Preston; E Ron; S Tokuoka; S Funamoto; N Nishi; M Soda; K Mabuchi; K Kodama
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 10.  PET imaging in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  Melissa M Hudson; Matthew J Krasin; Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-01-27
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Surveillance imaging in pediatric lymphoma.

Authors:  Stephan D Voss; Mitchell S Cairo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 2.  Surveillance imaging in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Stephan D Voss
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.952

3.  Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Brambilla; Agnieszka Kuchcińska; Roberta Matheoud; Alfredo Muni
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 3.629

4.  A retrospective comparison of CT and MRI in detecting pediatric cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Mark Henry; Ron I Riesenburger; James Kryzanski; Andrew Jea; Steven W Hwang
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Software-based PET-MR image coregistration: combined PET-MRI for the rest of us!

Authors:  Matthew S Robertson; Xinyang Liu; William Plishker; George F Zaki; Pranav K Vyas; Nabile M Safdar; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-07-05

6.  Relapse surveillance in AFP-positive hepatoblastoma: re-evaluating the role of imaging.

Authors:  Yesenia Rojas; R Paul Guillerman; Wei Zhang; Sanjeev A Vasudevan; Jed G Nuchtern; Patrick A Thompson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-05-18

7.  Limited role for surveillance PET-CT scanning in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in complete metabolic remission following primary therapy.

Authors:  C Y Cheah; M S Hofman; M Dickinson; A Wirth; D Westerman; S J Harrison; K Burbury; M Wolf; H Januszewicz; K Herbert; H M Prince; D A Carney; D S Ritchie; R J Hicks; J F Seymour
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Role of surveillance screening in detecting tumor recurrence after treatment of childhood cancers.

Authors:  Pelin Teke Kısa; Suna Emir
Journal:  Turk Arch Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-06

9.  Pediatric Burkitt's lymphoma and diffuse B-cell lymphoma: are surveillance scans required?

Authors:  H M Eissa; C E Allen; K Kamdar; S Simko; P Goradia; Z Dreyer; P Steuber; K L McClain; R P Guillerman; Catherine M Bollard
Journal:  Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 1.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.