Literature DB >> 28148644

Characteristics of the local cutaneous sensory thermoneutral zone.

Davide Filingeri1,2, Hui Zhang3, Edward A Arens3.   

Abstract

Skin temperature detection thresholds have been used to measure human cold and warm sensitivity across the temperature continuum. They exhibit a sensory zone within which neither warm nor cold sensations prevail. This zone has been widely assumed to coincide with steady-state local skin temperatures between 32 and 34°C, but its underlying neurophysiology has been rarely investigated. In this study we employ two approaches to characterize the properties of sensory thermoneutrality, testing for each whether neutrality shifts along the temperature continuum depending on adaptation to a preceding thermal state. The focus is on local spots of skin on the palm. Ten participants (age: 30.3 ± 4.8 yr) underwent two experiments. Experiment 1 established the cold-to-warm inter-detection threshold range for the palm's glabrous skin and its shift as a function of 3 starting skin temperatures (26, 31, or 36°C). For the same conditions, experiment 2 determined a thermally neutral zone centered around a thermally neutral point in which thermoreceptors' activity is balanced. The zone was found to be narrow (~0.98 to ~1.33°C), moving with the starting skin temperature over the temperature span 27.5-34.9°C (Pearson r = 0.94; P < 0.001). It falls within the cold-to-warm inter-threshold range (~2.25 to ~2.47°C) but is only half as wide. These findings provide the first quantitative analysis of the local sensory thermoneutral zone in humans, indicating that it does not occur only within a specific range of steady-state skin temperatures (i.e., it shifts across the temperature continuum) and that it differs from the inter-detection threshold range both quantitatively and qualitatively. These findings provide insight into thermoreception neurophysiology.NEW &amp; NOTEWORTHY Contrary to a widespread concept in human thermoreception, we show that local sensory thermoneutrality is achievable outside the 32-34°C skin temperature range. We propose that sensory adaption underlies a new mechanism of temperature integration. Also, we have developed from vision research a new quantitative test addressing the balance in activity of cutaneous cold and warm thermoreceptors. This could have important clinical (assessment of somatosensory abnormalities in neurological disease) and applied (design of personal comfort systems) implications.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychophysics; skin; temperature; thermoneutral zone; thermoreceptors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28148644      PMCID: PMC5384978          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00845.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  29 in total

1.  Relationship between cutaneous thermal thresholds, skin temperature and cross-sectional area of the stimulus.

Authors:  P P LELE
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1954-11-29       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known. 1916.

Authors:  D Du Bois; E F Du Bois
Journal:  Nutrition       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.008

Review 3.  Quantitative sensory testing and mapping: a review of nonautomated quantitative methods for examination of the patient with neuropathic pain.

Authors:  David Walk; Nalini Sehgal; Tobias Moeller-Bertram; Robert R Edwards; Ajay Wasan; Mark Wallace; Gordon Irving; Charles Argoff; Misha-Miroslav Backonja
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.442

4.  Spatial summation of thermal sensations depends on skin type and skin sensitivity.

Authors:  Ruth Defrin; Laura Petrini; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  "Cold" fiber population innervating palmar and digital skin of the monkey: responses to cooling pulses.

Authors:  I Darian-Smith; K O Johnson; R Dykes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Warm receptors in the nasal region of cats.

Authors:  H Hensel; D R Kenshalo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Thermoreception and temperature regulation.

Authors:  H Hensel
Journal:  Monogr Physiol Soc       Date:  1981

8.  Temporal course of thermal adaptation.

Authors:  D R Kenshalo; H A Scott
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-03-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Value of quantitative sensory testing in neurological and pain disorders: NeuPSIG consensus.

Authors:  Miroslav Misha Backonja; Nadine Attal; Ralf Baron; Didier Bouhassira; Mark Drangholt; Peter J Dyck; Robert R Edwards; Roy Freeman; Richard Gracely; Maija H Haanpaa; Per Hansson; Samar M Hatem; Elena K Krumova; Troels S Jensen; Christoph Maier; Gerard Mick; Andrew S Rice; Roman Rolke; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Jordi Serra; Thomas Toelle; Valeri Tugnoli; David Walk; Mark S Walalce; Mark Ware; David Yarnitsky; Dan Ziegler
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  Quantitative sensory testing in the German Research Network on Neuropathic Pain (DFNS): standardized protocol and reference values.

Authors:  R Rolke; R Baron; C Maier; T R Tölle; - D R Treede; A Beyer; A Binder; N Birbaumer; F Birklein; I C Bötefür; S Braune; H Flor; V Huge; R Klug; G B Landwehrmeyer; W Magerl; C Maihöfner; C Rolko; C Schaub; A Scherens; T Sprenger; M Valet; B Wasserka
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  3 in total

1.  Individualized analysis of skin thermosensory thresholds and sensitivity in heat-sensitive people with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Davide Filingeri; Georgia Chaseling; Aikaterini Christogianni; Kaltrina Feka; Antonino Bianco; Scott L Davis; Ollie Jay
Journal:  Temperature (Austin)       Date:  2020-05-24

2.  Differential Cutaneous Thermal Sensitivity in Humans: Method of Limit vs. Method of Sensation Magnitude.

Authors:  Yongsuk Seo; Jung-Hyun Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Cold and heavy: grasping the temperature-weight illusion.

Authors:  Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; Johanna Hagenkamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.