Literature DB >> 19377348

The effects of competition on community-based nursing wages.

Dara Zarnett1, Peter C Coyte, Eric Nauenberg, Diane Doran, Audrey Laporte.   

Abstract

In 1997, Ontario implemented a competitive bidding process for purchasing home care services, with the twin objectives of lowering costs and increasing service quality. The authors of this study performed regression analyses to ascertain the relationship between measures of competition, profit status of providers and nursing wages for community-based RNs and LPNs between 1995/1996 and 2000/2001. Using the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index as a measure of competition, we observed that only RN wages significantly increased as competition in home care increased. Furthermore, for-profit agencies paid significantly lower RN wages than their not-for-profit counterparts. By contrast, LPN wages declined over the sample period and did not differ markedly across provider types. The relative distribution of for-profit and not-for-profit agencies changed dramatically over the study period, with large increases in the number and volume of for-profit contracts. The results indicate that (a) greater competition in the home care sector resulted in upward pressure on RN wages independent of the profit status of the provider and (b) the increase appears to have been constrained by the increased presence of for-profit providers over the study period. The results highlight the role of profit status in provider behaviour, even in the context of publicly funded home care services. This finding has implications for both provider mix and the remuneration of nurses.
Copyright © 2009 Longwoods Publishing.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19377348      PMCID: PMC2653699     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  15 in total

1.  Measuring competition in health care markets.

Authors:  L C Baker
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Do competition and managed care improve quality?

Authors:  Nazmi Sari
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Keeping nurses at work: a duration analysis.

Authors:  Tor Helge Holmås
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Managing under managed community care: the experiences of clients, providers and managers in Ontario's competitive home care sector.

Authors:  Julia Abelson; Sara Tedford Gold; Christel Woodward; Denise O'Connor; Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Health-adjusted premium subsidies in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Wynand P M M van de Ven; René C J A van Vliet; Leida M Lamers
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  The economics of vocation or 'why is a badly paid nurse a good nurse'?

Authors:  Anthony Heyes
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Exploring limits to market-based reform: managed competition and rehabilitation home care services in Ontario.

Authors:  Glen E Randall; A Paul Williams
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  The impact of implementing managed competition on home care workers' turnover decisions.

Authors:  Margaret Denton; Isik Urla Zeytinoglu; Sharon Davies; Danielle Hunter
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-05

9.  The history and principles of managed competition.

Authors:  A C Enthoven
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 6.301

10.  Nurse working conditions and patient safety outcomes.

Authors:  Patricia W Stone; Cathy Mooney-Kane; Elaine L Larson; Teresa Horan; Laurent G Glance; Jack Zwanziger; Andrew W Dick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Market competition and price of disease management programmes: an observational study.

Authors:  Christel E van Dijk; Bob Venema; Judith D de Jong; Dinny H de Bakker
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.