Literature DB >> 19369207

Risk-dependent reward value signal in human prefrontal cortex.

Philippe N Tobler1, George I Christopoulos, John P O'Doherty, Raymond J Dolan, Wolfram Schultz.   

Abstract

When making choices under uncertainty, people usually consider both the expected value and risk of each option, and choose the one with the higher utility. Expected value increases the expected utility of an option for all individuals. Risk increases the utility of an option for risk-seeking individuals, but decreases it for risk averse individuals. In 2 separate experiments, one involving imperative (no-choice), the other choice situations, we investigated how predicted risk and expected value aggregate into a common reward signal in the human brain. Blood oxygen level dependent responses in lateral regions of the prefrontal cortex increased monotonically with increasing reward value in the absence of risk in both experiments. Risk enhanced these responses in risk-seeking participants, but reduced them in risk-averse participants. The aggregate value and risk responses in lateral prefrontal cortex contrasted with pure value signals independent of risk in the striatum. These results demonstrate an aggregate risk and value signal in the prefrontal cortex that would be compatible with basic assumptions underlying the mean-variance approach to utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19369207      PMCID: PMC2678436          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0809599106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  49 in total

1.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex on sensitivity to delayed and probabilistic reinforcement.

Authors:  S Mobini; S Body; M-Y Ho; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi; J F W Deakin; I M Anderson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-01-25       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Influence of reward expectation on visuospatial processing in macaque lateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Shunsuke Kobayashi; Johan Lauwereyns; Masashi Koizumi; Masamichi Sakagami; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Saccade reward signals in posterior cingulate cortex.

Authors:  Allison N McCoy; Justin C Crowley; Golnaz Haghighian; Heather L Dean; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Comparative cytoarchitectonic analysis of the human and the macaque ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and corticocortical connection patterns in the monkey.

Authors:  M Petrides; D N Pandya
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Neuronal correlates of a perceptual decision in ventral premotor cortex.

Authors:  Ranulfo Romo; Adrián Hernández; Antonio Zainos
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-01-08       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Dorsal striatum responses to reward and punishment: effects of valence and magnitude manipulations.

Authors:  M R Delgado; H M Locke; V A Stenger; J A Fiez
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Characterization of the decision-making deficit of patients with ventromedial prefrontal cortex lesions.

Authors:  A Bechara; D Tranel; H Damasio
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 13.501

9.  Phineas gauged: decision-making and the human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Alan G Sanfey; Reid Hastie; Mary K Colvin; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  The globus pallidus sends reward-related signals to the lateral habenula.

Authors:  Simon Hong; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  71 in total

Review 1.  A computational framework for the study of confidence in humans and animals.

Authors:  Adam Kepecs; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Reward skewness coding in the insula independent of probability and loss.

Authors:  Christopher J Burke; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hemispheric specialization for movement control produces dissociable differences in online corrections after stroke.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Pratik K Mutha; Kathleen Y Haaland; Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development.

Authors:  Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde; Hilde M Huizenga; Leah H Somerville; Mauricio R Delgado; Alisa Powers; Wouter D Weeda; B J Casey; Elke U Weber; Bernd Figner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Computational psychiatry of impulsivity and risk: how risk and time preferences interact in health and disease.

Authors:  Silvia Lopez-Guzman; Anna B Konova; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Genetic underpinnings of risky behaviour relate to altered neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Gökhan Aydogan; Remi Daviet; Richard Karlsson Linnér; Todd A Hare; Joseph W Kable; Henry R Kranzler; Reagan R Wetherill; Christian C Ruff; Philipp D Koellinger; Gideon Nave
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2021-01-28

7.  Impulsive choice and response in dopamine agonist-related impulse control behaviors.

Authors:  Valerie Voon; Brady Reynolds; Christina Brezing; Cecile Gallea; Meliha Skaljic; Vindhya Ekanayake; Hubert Fernandez; Marc N Potenza; Raymond J Dolan; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Recurrent, robust and scalable patterns underlie human approach and avoidance.

Authors:  Byoung Woo Kim; David N Kennedy; Joseph Lehár; Myung Joo Lee; Anne J Blood; Sang Lee; Roy H Perlis; Jordan W Smoller; Robert Morris; Maurizio Fava; Hans C Breiter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural signatures of intransitive preferences.

Authors:  Tobias Kalenscher; Philippe N Tobler; Willem Huijbers; Sander M Daselaar; Cyriel M A Pennartz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Reference and preference: how does the brain scale subjective value?

Authors:  John A Clithero; David V Smith
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.