Literature DB >> 25632132

Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development.

Anna C K van Duijvenvoorde1, Hilde M Huizenga2, Leah H Somerville3, Mauricio R Delgado4, Alisa Powers5, Wouter D Weeda6, B J Casey5, Elke U Weber7, Bernd Figner8.   

Abstract

Adolescence is often described as a period of increased risk taking relative to both childhood and adulthood. This inflection in risky choice behavior has been attributed to a neurobiological imbalance between earlier developing motivational systems and later developing top-down control regions. Yet few studies have decomposed risky choice to investigate the underlying mechanisms or tracked their differential developmental trajectory. The current study uses a risk-return decomposition to more precisely assess the development of processes underlying risky choice and to link them more directly to specific neural mechanisms. This decomposition specifies the influence of changing risks (outcome variability) and changing returns (expected value) on the choices of children, adolescents, and adults in a dynamic risky choice task, the Columbia Card Task. Behaviorally, risk aversion increased across age groups, with adults uniformly risk averse and adolescents showing substantial individual differences in risk sensitivity, ranging from risk seeking to risk averse. Neurally, we observed an adolescent peak in risk-related activation in the anterior insula and dorsal medial PFC. Return sensitivity, on the other hand, increased monotonically across age groups and was associated with increased activation in the ventral medial PFC and posterior cingulate cortex with age. Our results implicate adolescence as a developmental phase of increased neural risk sensitivity. Importantly, this work shows that using a behaviorally validated decision-making framework allows a precise operationalization of key constructs underlying risky choice that inform the interpretation of results.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/351549-12$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Columbia Card Task; decision making; expected value; insula; medial prefrontal cortex; variance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25632132      PMCID: PMC6795265          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1924-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  50 in total

1.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging of reward-related brain circuitry in children and adolescents.

Authors:  J Christopher May; Mauricio R Delgado; Ronald E Dahl; V Andrew Stenger; Neal D Ryan; Julie A Fiez; Cameron S Carter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.

Authors:  Bernd Figner; Rachael J Mackinlay; Friedrich Wilkening; Elke U Weber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Adolescents let sufficient evidence accumulate before making a decision when large incentives are at stake.

Authors:  Theresa Teslovich; Martijn Mulder; Nicholas T Franklin; Erika J Ruberry; Alex Millner; Leah H Somerville; Patrick Simen; Sarah Durston; B J Casey
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2013-09-16

4.  Neural representation of subjective value under risk and ambiguity.

Authors:  Ifat Levy; Jason Snell; Amy J Nelson; Aldo Rustichini; Paul W Glimcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The neural coding of feedback learning across child and adolescent development.

Authors:  Sabine Peters; Barbara R Braams; Maartje E J Raijmakers; P Cédric M P Koolschijn; Eveline A Crone
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Disruption of right prefrontal cortex by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces risk-taking behavior.

Authors:  Daria Knoch; Lorena R R Gianotti; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Valerie Treyer; Marianne Regard; Martin Hohmann; Peter Brugger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  P R Huttenlocher; A S Dabholkar
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-10-20       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 9.  A time of change: behavioral and neural correlates of adolescent sensitivity to appetitive and aversive environmental cues.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; Rebecca M Jones; B J Casey
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  A systematic review of fMRI reward paradigms used in studies of adolescents vs. adults: the impact of task design and implications for understanding neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Jessica M Richards; Rista C Plate; Monique Ernst
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Developmental perspectives on risky and impulsive choice.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Catherine A Hartley
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Novel insights from the Yellow Light Game: Safe and risky decisions differentially impact adolescent outcome-related brain function.

Authors:  Zdeňa A Op de Macks; Jessica E Flannery; Shannon J Peake; John C Flournoy; Arian Mobasser; Sarah L Alberti; Philip A Fisher; Jennifer H Pfeifer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Applying novel technologies and methods to inform the ontology of self-regulation.

Authors:  Ian W Eisenberg; Patrick G Bissett; Jessica R Canning; Jesse Dallery; A Zeynep Enkavi; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Oscar Gonzalez; Alan I Green; Mary Ann Greene; Michaela Kiernan; Sunny Jung Kim; Jamie Li; Michael R Lowe; Gina L Mazza; Stephen A Metcalf; Lisa Onken; Sadev S Parikh; Ellen Peters; Judith J Prochaska; Emily A Scherer; Luke E Stoeckel; Matthew J Valente; Jialing Wu; Haiyi Xie; David P MacKinnon; Lisa A Marsch; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-10-05

4.  Adolescent Decision-Making Under Risk: Neural Correlates and Sex Differences.

Authors:  Ozlem Korucuoglu; Michael P Harms; James T Kennedy; Semyon Golosheykin; Serguei V Astafiev; Deanna M Barch; Andrey P Anokhin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  The Influences of Described and Experienced Information on Adolescent Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Gail M Rosenbaum; Vinod Venkatraman; Laurence Steinberg; Jason M Chein
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2017-10-19

6.  Adolescent neural response to reward is related to participant sex and task motivation.

Authors:  Gabriela Alarcón; Anita Cservenka; Bonnie J Nagel
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Development of large-scale functional networks from birth to adulthood: A guide to the neuroimaging literature.

Authors:  David S Grayson; Damien A Fair
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neural Correlates of Risk Processing Among Adolescents: Influences of Parental Monitoring and Household Chaos.

Authors:  Nina Lauharatanahirun; Dominique Maciejewski; Christopher Holmes; Kirby Deater-Deckard; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon; Brooks King-Casas
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2018-01-31

9.  Insular Risk Processing Predicts Alcohol Use Via Externalizing Pathway in Male Adolescents.

Authors:  Jacob Elder; Alexis Brieant; Nina Lauharatanahirun; Brooks King-Casas; Jungmeen Kim-Spoon
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Family conflict shapes how adolescents take risks when their family is affected.

Authors:  João F Guassi Moreira; Eva H Telzer
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2017-10-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.