| Literature DB >> 19366437 |
Ralph Menzel1, Suresh C Swain, Sebastian Hoess, Evelyn Claus, Stefanie Menzel, Christian Ew Steinberg, Georg Reifferscheid, Stephen R Stürzenbaum.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Traditionally, toxicity of river sediments is assessed using whole sediment tests with benthic organisms. The challenge, however, is the differentiation between multiple effects caused by complex contaminant mixtures and the unspecific toxicity endpoints such as survival, growth or reproduction. The use of gene expression profiling facilitates the identification of transcriptional changes at the molecular level that are specific to the bio-available fraction of pollutants.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19366437 PMCID: PMC2674462 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-160
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Key chemical properties/parameters of the sediments.
| 32 | 21 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2 | 3 | |
| <2 | <2 | <2 | |
| 42.2 | 38.3 | 40.3 | |
| 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
| 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
| 3.0 | 50.0 | 11.0 | |
| 11.0 | 13.0 | 8.0 | |
| 13.0 | 6.0 | 27.0 | |
| 71.0 | 27.0 | 52.0 | |
| 170 | 110 | 270 | |
| 1.34 | 3.06 | 6.10 | |
| 19.2 | 28.0 | 44.7 | |
| 0.09 | 0.10 | 430 | |
| 0.12 | 0.94 | 230 | |
| 0.61 | 0.32 | 56 | |
| 0.17 | 0.81 | 56 | |
| 0.76 | 1.10 | 110 | |
| 1.50 | 2.00 | 33 | |
| 1.60 | 10 | 56 | |
| 0.11 | 0.33 | 6.30 | |
| 4.0 | < 2.0 | 11.3 | |
| 10.4 | 18.6 | 41.3 | |
| 29.9 | 89.6 | 144.0 | |
| 0.64 | 1.26 | 6.9 | |
| 56.5 | 91.5 | 102.0 | |
| 51.2 | 70.2 | 136.0 | |
| 36.1 | 61.5 | 65.4 | |
| 0.48 | 0.5 | 1.5 | |
| 270 | 490 | 1060 | |
All concentrations are units per kg dry sediment and derived from a single measurement with appropriate analytical controls. The sediment volumes differ depending on which analysis was performed and the degree of contamination (typically, between 100 mg and 2 g of dried sediment). Abbreviations of organic pollutants: TPH – Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon; Σ 16 EPA PAH (; Σ7 PCB -Ballschmitter No. 28, 52, 101, 118,138,153,180; HCH – Hexachlorcyclohexane; DDT – Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane; DDD – Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane; DDE – Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene; HCB – Hexachlorobenzene; OCS – Octachlorostyrene; TBT – Tributyltin. Metal measurements were performed on the < 20 μm fraction.
Whole sediment toxicity (reproduction tests with Caenorhabditis elegans), genotoxicity in pore water (Comet assay), and estrogenic activity in pore water (YES = yeast estrogen screen).
| reproduction | 133.7 ± 21.7 | 90.8 ± 13.4 | 58.9 ± 16.4 | 69.3 ± 17.8 |
| % inhibition | 0 | 32.1 | 55.9** | 48.1** |
| 25% pore water | 7.64 ± 1.06 | 8.72 ± 0.63 | 9.28 ± 1.05 | 10.86 ± 0.54 |
| 50% pore water | 7.06 ± 0.43 | 11.59 ± 1.84 | 13.50 ± 0.80* | 13.50 ± 0.80* |
| EEQ [ng/L] | - | 9.0 ± 2.26 | 18.8 ± 5.33 | 31.6 ± 11.6*** |
a The toxicity test is based on the mean of four replicate experiments
b % tail DNA (% vitality) was calculated of 100 randomly selected nuclei on two replicate slides;
c EEQ values were calculated from three independent experiments (performed using 50% pore water), each consisting of three replicates;
* Significantly different to the negative control (p < 0.05);
** Significantly different to the negative control (p < 0.01);
*** Significantly different to the Danube sample (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Hierarchical cluster analysis. Transcript profiles of 1331 C. elegans genes, which were found to be significantly differentially expressed as result of Elbe and/or Rhine sediment exposure (ANOVA, n = 5, p < 0.05, >1.4-fold change). The individual figures illustrate the relationship between the sediment samples to the reference (Danube sediment). (A) Principal components analysis, the first three components are included. (B) Condition tree demonstrating the relationship of the 15 individual replicates. (C) Hierarchical cluster analysis showing individual replicates (n = 5, left) and group averages (right). D – Danube sediment, E – Elbe sediment sample, R – Rhine sediment sample.
Figure 2Overrepresented genes in Venn diagrams. Overview of genes and functional categories overrepresented in response to Elbe and/or Rhine sediment exposure. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap of significantly up- and down-regulated genes (ANOVA, n = 5, p < 0.05, >1.4-fold change). Significantly overrepresented GO categories (B) and KEGG pathways (C) were created using Microarray Analysis Tools (p < 0.01, at least three members of an individual KEGG pathway). E – Elbe sediment sample, R – Rhine sediment sample.
Figure 3Overrepresented KEGG pathways. Identification, direction of change and description of 29 genes identified as members of overrepresented KEGG pathways.
Figure 4Biological processes – partial GO tree. Partial GO tree presenting relevant biological processes which were found to be overrepresented in C elegans exposed to Elbe and/or Rhine sediment.