Literature DB >> 15003699

Ecotoxicogenomics: the challenge of integrating genomics into aquatic and terrestrial ecotoxicology.

Jason R Snape1, Steve J Maund, Daniel B Pickford, Thomas H Hutchinson.   

Abstract

Rapid progress in the field of genomics (the study of how an individual's entire genetic make-up, the genome, translates into biological functions) is beginning to provide tools that may assist our understanding of how chemicals can impact on human and ecosystem health. In many ways, if scientific and regulatory efforts in the 20th century have sought to establish which chemicals cause damage to ecosystems, then the challenge in ecotoxicology for the 21st century is to understand the mechanisms of toxicity to different wildlife species. In the human context, 'toxicogenomics' is the study of expression of genes important in adaptive responses to toxic exposures and a reflection of the toxic processes per se. Given the parallel implications for ecological (environmental) risk assessment, we propose the term 'ecotoxicogenomics' to describe the integration of genomics (transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics) into ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicogenomics is defined as the study of gene and protein expression in non-target organisms that is important in responses to environmental toxicant exposures. The potential of ecotoxicogenomic tools in ecological risk assessment seems great. Many of the standardized methods used to assess potential impact of chemicals on aquatic organisms rely on measuring whole-organism responses (e.g. mortality, growth, reproduction) of generally sensitive indicator species at maintained concentrations, and deriving 'endpoints' based on these phenomena (e.g. median lethal concentrations, no observed effect concentrations, etc.). Whilst such phenomenological approaches are useful for identifying chemicals of potential concern they provide little understanding of the mechanism of chemical toxicity. Without this understanding, it will be difficult to address some of the key challenges that currently face aquatic ecotoxicology, e.g. predicting toxicant responses across the very broad diversity of the phylogenetic groups present in aquatic ecosystems; estimating how changes at one ecological level or organisation will affect other levels (e.g. predicting population-level effects); predicting the influence of time-varying exposure on toxicant responses. Ecotoxicogenomic tools may provide us with a better mechanistic understanding of aquatic ecotoxicology. For ecotoxicogenomics to fulfil its potential, collaborative efforts are necessary through the parallel use of model microorganisms (e.g. Saccharomyces cerevisiae) together with aquatic (e.g. Danio rerio, Daphnia magna, Lemna minor and Xenopus tropicalis) and terrestrial (e.g. Arabidopsis thailiana, Caenorhabdites elegans and Eisenia foetida) plants, animals and microorganisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003699     DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2003.11.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aquat Toxicol        ISSN: 0166-445X            Impact factor:   4.964


  44 in total

1.  Reference genes for qPCR assays in toxic metal and salinity stress in two flatworm model organisms.

Authors:  Michelle Plusquin; Olivier DeGheselle; Ann Cuypers; Ellen Geerdens; Andromeda Van Roten; Tom Artois; Karen Smeets
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Finding biomarkers is getting easier.

Authors:  Brian Patrick Bradley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Toxicogenomics in regulatory ecotoxicology.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; George P Daston; Sigmund J Degitz; Nancy D Denslow; Robert A Hoke; Sean W Kennedy; Ann L Miracle; Edward J Perkins; Jason Snape; Donald E Tillitt; Charles R Tyler; Donald Versteeg
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Mysid crustaceans as standard models for the screening and testing of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Tim Verslycke; An Ghekiere; Sandy Raimondo; Colin Janssen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Estimating the efficiency of fish cross-species cDNA microarray hybridization.

Authors:  Raphael Cohen; Vered Chalifa-Caspi; Timothy D Williams; Meirav Auslander; Stephen G George; James K Chipman; Moshe Tom
Journal:  Mar Biotechnol (NY)       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  The zebrafish embryo model in environmental risk assessment--applications beyond acute toxicity testing.

Authors:  Stefan Scholz; Stephan Fischer; Ulrike Gündel; Eberhard Küster; Till Luckenbach; Doris Voelker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Biodiversity for our future.

Authors:  Yukio Yokota; Valeria Matranga
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.823

8.  Identification of suitable qPCR reference genes in leaves of Brassica oleracea under abiotic stresses.

Authors:  Franck Brulle; Fabien Bernard; Franck Vandenbulcke; Damien Cuny; Sylvain Dumez
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 9.  Earthworm genomes, genes and proteins: the (re)discovery of Darwin's worms.

Authors:  S R Stürzenbaum; J Andre; P Kille; A J Morgan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 10.  Genomics technology for assessing soil pollution.

Authors:  Nico M van Straalen; Dick Roelofs
Journal:  J Biol       Date:  2008-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.