Literature DB >> 19363179

An abbreviated implicit spatial context learning task that yields greater learning.

Ilana J Bennett1, Kelly Anne Barnes, James H Howard, Darlene V Howard.   

Abstract

The spatial contextual cuing task (SCCT) (Chun & Jiang, 1998) is an implicit learning task that appears to depend on the medial temporal lobes. This unusual combination has been of interest in functional imaging studies and research with clinical populations, where testing time is at a premium. However, the original version of the SCCT is time-consuming. In this study, 29 young adults (age range, 18-22 years) completed the SCCT, in which participants respond to the orientation of a target in arrays containing 11 distractors. Either 12 (original version) or 6 (abbreviated version) arrays repeated across the experiment, with the remaining novel arrays being generated randomly. Results revealed that the magnitude of learning (faster responses to repeated versus novel arrays) was larger when there were fewer repeated arrays, with no explicit awareness in most participants. Thus, the abbreviated version remained implicit, with the additional benefit of increasing the magnitude of learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19363179      PMCID: PMC2669684          DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  25 in total

1.  Circuit mechanisms underlying memory encoding and retrieval in the long axis of the hippocampal formation.

Authors:  S A Small; A S Nava; G M Perera; R DeLaPaz; R Mayeux; Y Stern
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  PARAMEERS OF PAIRED-ASSOCIATE VERBAL LEARNING: LENGTH OF LIST, MEANINGFULNESS, RATE OF PRESENTATION, AND ABILITY.

Authors:  J B CARROLL; M L BURKE
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-06

3.  Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Marvin M Chun; Yuhong Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.

Authors:  Jed A Meltzer; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search.

Authors:  Alejandro Lleras; Adrian Von Mühlenen
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2004

6.  Developmental differences in implicit learning of spatial context.

Authors:  Chandan J Vaidya; Marianne Huger; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  An FMRI study of the role of the medial temporal lobe in implicit and explicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Haline E Schendan; Meghan M Searl; Rebecca J Melrose; Chantal E Stern
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Effects of ApoE genotype and mild cognitive impairment on implicit learning.

Authors:  Selam Negash; Lindsay E Petersen; Yonas E Geda; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Glenn E Smith; Robert J Ivnik; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 4.673

9.  High-capacity spatial contextual memory.

Authors:  Yuhong Jiang; Joo-Hyun Song; Amanda Rigas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

10.  Two forms of implicit learning in young adults with dyslexia.

Authors:  Ilana J Bennett; Jennifer C Romano; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  8 in total

1.  Two forms of implicit learning in childhood ADHD.

Authors:  Kelly Anne Barnes; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard; Laura Kenealy; Chandan J Vaidya
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Relationship of contextual cueing and hippocampal volume in amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients and cognitively normal older adults.

Authors:  Selam Negash; Daria Kliot; Darlene V Howard; James H Howard; Sandhistu R Das; Paul A Yushkevich; John B Pluta; Steven E Arnold; David A Wolk
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.892

3.  Procedural learning and associative memory mechanisms contribute to contextual cueing: Evidence from fMRI and eye-tracking.

Authors:  Anna Manelis; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Dopamine transporter genotype predicts implicit sequence learning.

Authors:  Jessica R Simon; Melanie Stollstorff; Lauren C Westbay; Chandan J Vaidya; James H Howard; Darlene V Howard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Computerized Cognitive Tests Are Associated with Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease in Cognitively Normal Individuals 10 Years Prior.

Authors:  Anja Soldan; Corinne Pettigrew; Abhay Moghekar; Marilyn Albert
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  Individual differences in spatial configuration learning predict the occurrence of intrusive memories.

Authors:  Thomas Meyer; Tom Smeets; Timo Giesbrecht; Conny W E M Quaedflieg; Marta M Girardelli; Georgina R N Mackay; Harald Merckelbach
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 7.  Underpowered samples, false negatives, and unconscious learning.

Authors:  Miguel A Vadillo; Emmanouil Konstantinidis; David R Shanks
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-02

8.  Acute stress differentially affects spatial configuration learning in high and low cortisol-responding healthy adults.

Authors:  Thomas Meyer; Tom Smeets; Timo Giesbrecht; Conny W E M Quaedflieg; Harald Merckelbach
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2013-05-02
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.