Literature DB >> 19362290

Prospective randomized controlled trial comparing V-Y advancement flap with primary suture methods in pilonidal disease.

Tarik Zafer Nursal1, Ali Ezer, Kenan Calişkan, Nurkan Törer, Sedat Belli, Gökhan Moray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An ideal treatment method for the widely prevalent pilonidal sinus disease is not yet available. The most commonly practiced technique is simple closure following resection of the effected tissue. However, high recurrence rates in some series have led to the search for other methods. One of these methods is the V-Y advancement flap (VYAF), which in theory results in the flattening of the natal cleft without tension in the suture line.
METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, the VYAF method was compared to 2 simple primary closure techniques. In 238 patients, following resection, in the AL (all layers) group, all layers were closed with polypropylene sutures. In the SS (subcutaneous suture) group, polyglactin subcutaneous sutures were used to approximate the wound edges. Skin was closed separately in the SS group. In addition, demographic variables, past history, physical examination findings, defect dimensions, and wound tension were recorded.
RESULTS: Surgical site infection was observed in 23.9%, 17.4%, and 10.2% of the patients in AL, SS, and VYAF groups, respectively (P = .129). Early wound dehiscence without infection was detected in 11.9%, 7.4%, and 10.2% of the patients in groups AL, SS, and VYAF, respectively (P = .665). Mean follow-up was 29.7 +/- 15.6 months. Survival (time without recurrence) was not significantly different between groups (P = .648). In the whole group, independent predictors of recurrence according to logistic regression analysis were younger age, recurrent disease, presence of discharge on physical examination, and development of postoperative surgical site infection.
CONCLUSIONS: VYAF is not superior to simple primary closure techniques in terms of postoperative complications, recurrence, and patient satisfaction. For most cases, simple primary closure would suffice. Patients should be informed of the increased risk of recurrence if any of the independent predictors (being a recurrent case, presence of discharge, development of postoperative infection) are present. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19362290     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  18 in total

1.  Pilonidal disease.

Authors:  Amit Khanna; John L Rombeau
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2011-03

2.  The treatment of pilonidal disease: guidelines of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR).

Authors:  D Segre; M Pozzo; R Perinotti; B Roche
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Laser epilation prior to pilonidal sinus surgery.

Authors:  C Garcia; N Ibañez; J Abrisqueta
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  A comparison of flap reconstruction vs the laying open technique or excision and direct suture for pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis of randomised studies.

Authors:  Charline Berthier; Emilie Bérard; Thomas Meresse; Jean-Louis Grolleau; Christian Herlin; Benoit Chaput
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus.

Authors:  J M Enriquez-Navascues; J I Emparanza; M Alkorta; C Placer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.

Authors:  I Iesalnieks; A Ommer; S Petersen; D Doll; A Herold
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Comparison of Common Surgical Procedures in Non-complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease, a 7-Year Follow-Up Trial.

Authors:  Mujgan Caliskan; Koray Kosmaz; Ismail Ege Subasi; Aylin Acar; Ismail Evren; Gurhan Bas; Ali Timucin Atayoglu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Which surgical procedure offers the best treatment for pilonidal disease?

Authors:  Bariş Saylam; Derya Nurhan Balli; Arife Polat Düzgün; M Vasfi Ozer; Faruk Coşkun
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Outcomes in the repair of pilonidal sinus disease excision wounds using a parasacral perforator flap.

Authors:  M R Venus; O G Titley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial.

Authors:  Ali Guner; Aydin Boz; Omer Faruk Ozkan; Omer Ileli; Can Kece; Erhan Reis
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.